IA: Failure to articulate why state const. applies for different result is waiver

Failure to articulate one’s argument that the state constitution requires a different result is waiver. State v. Versteegh, 2022 Iowa App. LEXIS 434 (June 15, 2022).

“Here, the issuing judge reasonably concluded, based on all of the circumstances, that there was at least a fair probability that evidence of crime would be located based on authorization of the GPS tracking device for Petitfrere’s vehicle. First, the affidavit included detailed information indicating that the target residence was a drug trafficking premises.” At the least, the good faith exception applies, too. United States v. Petitfrere, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105875 (E.D.Ky. June 14, 2022).*

Questions to a motorist about marijuana during gathering papers for the stop didn’t extend it. United States v. Patterson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106319 (E.D.Mich. June 14, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.