Author Archives: Hall

D.D.C.: 1/6 geofence warrant was for phones within the crime scene and was reasonable

The 1/6 Capitol geofence warrant was issued with probable cause and was specific, limited to those within the Capitol or on the restricted grounds, not just near it. United States v. Easterday, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8978 (D.D.C. Jan. 18, … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on D.D.C.: 1/6 geofence warrant was for phones within the crime scene and was reasonable

GA: Question in inventory was whether it was reasonable, not whether it was necessary

The question in inventory was whether it was reasonable, not whether it was necessary. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to suppress. McAnnally v. State, 2024 Ga. App. LEXIS 19 (Jan. 18, 2024). The prolonged retention of defendant’s cell … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Inventory, Scope of search | Comments Off on GA: Question in inventory was whether it was reasonable, not whether it was necessary

CA3: Cuffing and taking def in on RS for a show-up was not a de facto arrest

Removing defendant on reasonable suspicion from a high crime area to the police station for a show-up and further identification was not unreasonable. It did not become a de facto arrest. United States v. Carter, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 1155 … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Cuffing and taking def in on RS for a show-up was not a de facto arrest

N.D.Ohio: Arrest of County Commissioner for speaking at public meeting shown 1A retaliation and without PC

Plaintiff is a County Commissioner arrested by police at a Commission meeting for being disruptive. The arrest was shown to be First Amendment retaliation and without Fourth Amendment probable cause. Plaintiff was never ruled “out of order” by the chair; … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Arrest of County Commissioner for speaking at public meeting shown 1A retaliation and without PC

NC: SW for documents permitted officers to leaf though def’s rehab journal

Officers had a warrant that included documents. An officer leafed through defendants drug abuse/recovery journal looking for things within the warrant without really reading it. He came upon evidence of another crime. A second warrant was obtained for the journal. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on NC: SW for documents permitted officers to leaf though def’s rehab journal

NM: Def had standing in zippered bag in car under state constitution despite denial of ownership at trial

Defendant filed a motion to suppress the inventory search of a black zippered bag in his car. At trial, however, he denied the bag was his. He still had standing under the state constitution because of the higher expectation of … Continue reading

Posted in Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on NM: Def had standing in zippered bag in car under state constitution despite denial of ownership at trial

CA8: Police dog’s accidental biting of guest of officer not 4A excessive force

Police dog’s charging and biting a guest of the officer was accidental, not excessive force. Fourth Amendment claim dismissed. Whitworth v. Kling, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 1039 (8th Cir. Jan. 17, 2024) (The court cited a 1999 Arkansas case that … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA8: Police dog’s accidental biting of guest of officer not 4A excessive force

MO: Exclusionary rule does not apply to DL revocations

Even if the officer was outside his jurisdiction when defendant was stopped, that’s for criminal cases, not driver’s license revocations, which are civil. No exclusionary rule here. Craig v. Dir. of Revenue, 2024 Mo. App. LEXIS 23 (Jan. 16, 2024) … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on MO: Exclusionary rule does not apply to DL revocations

N.D.Tex.: Rule 41 doesn’t apply to forfeiture actions; Supplemental Rule G(8)(a) does

The government sought forfeiture of the owner’s cash after it was seized at DFW after a dog sniff on his bag. The owner responded with a motion to suppress under Rule 41, but that doesn’t apply in forfeiture cases. Supplemental … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Forfeiture, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Rule 41 doesn’t apply to forfeiture actions; Supplemental Rule G(8)(a) does

N.D.Fla.: No standing against tracking a stolen cell phone

Defendant claimed a Brady violation for failure to disclose a Stingray device was used to track the victim’s cell phone in his possession. It’s not. Moreover, defendant doesn’t even have standing in a stolen cell phone. Bass v. Dixon, 2023 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, GPS / Tracking Data, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: No standing against tracking a stolen cell phone

D.Mass.: Inevitable discovery applies to def giving up passcode to cell phone

Inevitable discovery applies to defendant giving up the passcode to his cell phone by a statement he challenged. The government had an independent basis to get into the phone to search it. United States v. Xiaolei Wu, 2024 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Inevitable discovery applies to def giving up passcode to cell phone

D.C.Cir. denies rehearing en banc in Trump Twitter SW case

The D.C. Cir. denied rehearing from the Twitter account search warrant for former President Trump’s account, In re Sealed Case, 77 F.4th 815 (D.C. Cir. July 18, 2023) (corrected and unredacted version), in In re Search of Info. Stored at … Continue reading

Posted in Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.C.Cir. denies rehearing en banc in Trump Twitter SW case

OH6: Return of property can’t be by motion to suppress after PG

Defendant’s motion for return of his cell phone after his guilty plea was pled as a motion to suppress. Denied. He can do it over if he gets it right. State v. Cousino, 2024-Ohio-114, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 110 (6th … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OH6: Return of property can’t be by motion to suppress after PG

Guam: Seizure of USB found during frisk for officer safety unreasonable; clearly not a weapon

During a stop for stalled car, officer safety dictated the officer conduct a patdown. Seizure of a USB off defendant’s keyring was unreasonable. The stop should have ended there. Instead, the officer asked for consent which the court finds involuntary … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on Guam: Seizure of USB found during frisk for officer safety unreasonable; clearly not a weapon

W.D.Pa.: Affidavit for SW failed to show PC, but it wasn’t completely bare bones, so GFE applies

The affidavit averred that defendant came from his house and got in his car manifesting characteristics of somebody who was probably armed, although the officers could see no gun. This is all inference, which isn’t precluded. The affidavit is not … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Affidavit for SW failed to show PC, but it wasn’t completely bare bones, so GFE applies

D.Me.: SW affidavit mentioned a licensing complaint against defendant doctor, but omission that the complaint was resolved favorably gets a Franks hearing

Defendant is a D.O. accused of over prescribing. She made her substantial preliminary showing to get a Franks hearing because the affiant omitted from the affidavit for warrant that the licensing authority considered the same claims and found she acted … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Me.: SW affidavit mentioned a licensing complaint against defendant doctor, but omission that the complaint was resolved favorably gets a Franks hearing

ND: Driver couldn’t consent to search of passenger’s backpack

The driver of a car could not consent to search of a backpack that by all accounts belonged to the passenger. It was where he sat, and the driver said it wasn’t hers. Inside was men’s clothes and stuff. State … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on ND: Driver couldn’t consent to search of passenger’s backpack

CA7: SW affidavit omitted things but it wasn’t intentionally or recklessly misleading

The affidavit was lacking some important information, but it was not intentionally or recklessly misleading to the issuing magistrate. Thus, defendant’s Franks challenge fails. United States v. Hueston, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 832 (7th Cir. Jan. 12, 2024):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA7: SW affidavit omitted things but it wasn’t intentionally or recklessly misleading

KS: PC for truck extended to its fifth-wheel trailer

With probable cause to search defendant’s truck, that extended to the fifth-wheel trailer it was towing. State v. Crudo, 2024 Kan. LEXIS 4 (Jan. 12, 2024). The “Rodriguez moment” came when the officer asked for consent to search. On the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: PC for truck extended to its fifth-wheel trailer

NY: No RS where two men talked car-to-car and then moved, and one leaned in other car; nothing seen passed

There was no reasonable suspicion to stop and detain defendant for what the officer thought could have been a hand-to-hand drug transaction where he saw nothing exchanged. Defendant stopped along side another car facing in different directions, and they talked … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on NY: No RS where two men talked car-to-car and then moved, and one leaned in other car; nothing seen passed