W.D.Pa.: Affidavit for SW failed to show PC, but it wasn’t completely bare bones, so GFE applies

The affidavit averred that defendant came from his house and got in his car manifesting characteristics of somebody who was probably armed, although the officers could see no gun. This is all inference, which isn’t precluded. The affidavit is not bare bones, and the good faith exception applies: “Though the Court finds that the facts as stated in the Warrant are insufficient to establish probable cause, it does not find that the Warrant was based on an affidavit so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to render official belief in its existence entirely unreasonable. The Court holds that the officers executed the Warrant (up until and including the recovery of a firearm) in good faith.” United States v. Smith, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6925 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2024).*

This officer’s seeing a meth pipe in plain view during a traffic stop was probable cause to search the interior of the car. United States v. Hays, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 868 (7th Cir. Jan. 12, 2024).*

Defendant’s driving from home to the place of the controlled buy and back again was nexus. The controlled buy was probable cause. United States v. Phillips, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6853 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 12, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.