Monthly Archives: January 2025

E.D.Okla.: Search of lawyers and their cars coming into jail did not obstruct access to counsel

Stopping and searching the car and person of defense counsel coming into a USMS jail did not violate defendant’s right to access to counsel. The limitations were all reasonable. United States v. Freeman, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6745 (E.D. Okla. … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Search of lawyers and their cars coming into jail did not obstruct access to counsel

NY Albany Co.: Unrestrained administrative searches of cannabis stores violates 4A

Petitioners show a likelihood of success on their claim for injunctive relief from unrestrained “administrative inspections,” essentially without boundaries. Super Smoke N Save LLC v. N.Y. State Cannabis Control Bd., 2025 NY Slip Op 25009 (Albany Co. Jan. 13, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on NY Albany Co.: Unrestrained administrative searches of cannabis stores violates 4A

D.Minn.: Overdose call justified frisk

Police encountered defendant because he was experiencing an overdose. A frisk of his pockets for the cause produced a gun. United States v. Wright, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236845 (D. Minn. Nov. 25, 2024), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4921 … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Emergency / exigency, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Overdose call justified frisk

CA2: Mental health seizure for danger to self or others requires PC and exigency

“[A] ‘warrantless seizure for the purpose of involuntary hospitalization may be made only upon probable cause, that is, only if there are reasonable grounds for believing that the person seized is dangerous to [him]self or to others.” Singh v. City … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Mental health seizure for danger to self or others requires PC and exigency

DE: Probation searches of individuals include their residence

The statute on individuals subject to probation searches includes their residences. State v. Crooks, 2024 Del. Super. LEXIS 830 (Dec. 31, 2024). There were exigent circumstances based on the reported gunshot, potential threat to officers and public safety, and the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on DE: Probation searches of individuals include their residence

W.D.Pa.: No standing to contest civil investigative demands to third parties over medical records

Defendant had no standing to contest civil investigative demands to third parties, even involving medical records of others. United States v. Hertel & Brown Physical & Aquatic Therapy, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6437 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2025):

Posted in Privileges, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: No standing to contest civil investigative demands to third parties over medical records

D.Minn.: Photographs could be taken during execution of SW

Photographs could be taken during execution of a search warrant. United States v. Schultz, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236848 (D. Minn. Dec. 2, 2024), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4918 (D. Minn. Jan. 10, 2025). In a case involving whether … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Photographs could be taken during execution of SW

E.D.Mich.: Officer seizing notebooks couldn’t authenticate them as exhibits at trial

The seizing officer could not authenticate defendant’s notebooks as evidence at the trial. He had no knowledge about how they came into being. United States v. Sherman, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5696 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 12, 2025). Defendant’s admission at … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Officer seizing notebooks couldn’t authenticate them as exhibits at trial

D.P.R.: State nighttime search rule on state warrant inapplicable in federal court

The fact a state nighttime search warrant doesn’t comply with state law doesn’t matter in federal court. It’s whether Rule 41 and the Fourth Amendment were complied with. Then, the defendant has to show prejudice. Also, the fact defendant had … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.P.R.: State nighttime search rule on state warrant inapplicable in federal court

TX: Judge sanctioned for blocking DNA testing of class A misdemeanants without authority

A former judge of the Harris County Criminal Court was sanctioned by the Texas Supreme Court for issuing orders of protection barring the Sheriff from taking DNA samples from class A misdemeanants because the judge believed the statute requiring it … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, DNA, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on TX: Judge sanctioned for blocking DNA testing of class A misdemeanants without authority

Reason: DEA ends airport gate searches after years of documented abuses of civil asset forfeiture

Reason: DEA ends airport gate searches after years of documented abuses of civil asset forfeiture by C.J. Ciaramella (“The Justice Department temporarily suspended the program in November because of ‘significant risks’ of constitutional violations.”):

Posted in Airport searches, Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: DEA ends airport gate searches after years of documented abuses of civil asset forfeiture

CA8: When there’s PC for a SW, standing doesn’t even have to be decided

In a tax fraud case, there were six search warrants. Defendants challenge them all. Standing was in dispute, but doesn’t even have to be decided because there clearly is probable cause for all six, despite the claim that one piece … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: When there’s PC for a SW, standing doesn’t even have to be decided

ID: DV NCO denies def standing in premises

Issuance of an NCO on defendant denies him standing when he was found in the premises he was ordered from. He has no reasonable expectation of privacy once ordered away. Prior cases in accord are not overruled. State v. Ortiz, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on ID: DV NCO denies def standing in premises

Reason: Nevada Judge to Nevada Cops: You Can’t Use This Loophole To Get Around Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform

Reason: Nevada Judge to Nevada Cops: You Can’t Use This Loophole To Get Around Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform by C.J. Ciaramella (“In the first decision of its kind in Nevada, a judge ruled last week that state law enforcement can’t … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: Nevada Judge to Nevada Cops: You Can’t Use This Loophole To Get Around Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform

WaPo: Arrested by AI: Police ignore standards after facial recognition matches

WaPo: Arrested by AI: Police ignore standards after facial recognition matches by Douglas MacMillan, David Ovalle & Aaron Schaffer (“Confident in unproven facial recognition technology, sometimes investigators skip steps; at least eight Americans have been wrongfully arrested.”):

Posted in Facial recognition | Comments Off on WaPo: Arrested by AI: Police ignore standards after facial recognition matches

FL5: Dog alert on MJ before case law said it wasn’t PC anymore was in good faith

Newer cases hold that a drug dog can’t differentiate between legal and illegal marijuana, so a dog alert doesn’t provide probable cause. Where the dog sniff occurred before that holding, however, it was reasonable under the good faith exception. Ford … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on FL5: Dog alert on MJ before case law said it wasn’t PC anymore was in good faith

FL3: With a change in statute, mere possession of a firearm in a high crime area wasn’t RS

“While the officer observed Sheppard with a concealed weapon in a high crime area, under the revised statute making non-licensure an element of the crime of concealed carry, Sheppard’s mere possession of the concealed weapon did not constitute criminal activity. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on FL3: With a change in statute, mere possession of a firearm in a high crime area wasn’t RS

E.D.Tex.: Suppression not remedy for knock-and-announce violation

Suppression is not the remedy for a knock-and-announce violation. United States v. Bello, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236255 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 2024),* adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2332 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2025).* Defendant had no standing to question … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Knock and announce, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Suppression not remedy for knock-and-announce violation

CA7: Concession of PC in USDC bars this claim

“On appeal, Birkley does not contest the district court’s reasons for dismissing the case, including its rationale that Birkley failed to state a claim because he conceded at his preliminary hearing that the police had probable cause for their actions. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Waiver | Comments Off on CA7: Concession of PC in USDC bars this claim

C.D.Cal.: Warehouse used as a residence required admin. warrant for fire inspection

A fire inspection of a warehouse that was being used as a residence was subject to the administrative warrant requirement. No exception applies. Hannan v. L.A. Cty. Fire Dep’t, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 235999 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2024). 2254 … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Warehouse used as a residence required admin. warrant for fire inspection