FL3: With a change in statute, mere possession of a firearm in a high crime area wasn’t RS

“While the officer observed Sheppard with a concealed weapon in a high crime area, under the revised statute making non-licensure an element of the crime of concealed carry, Sheppard’s mere possession of the concealed weapon did not constitute criminal activity. … [¶] Thus, we are compelled to conclude that the officers lacked the requisite reasonable suspicion to conduct the subject investigatory stop.” Sheppard v. State, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 221 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 8, 2025).

“The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of the denial of his motion to controvert a search warrant and to suppress physical evidence seized in the execution thereof.” People v. Dickerson, 2025 NY Slip Op 00108 (2d Dept. Jan. 8, 2025).*

“This record clearly demonstrates that Petitioner was afforded a full and fair opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment Claims in the Delaware state courts. The fact that Petitioner disagrees with these decisions and/or the reasoning utilized therein is insufficient to overcome the Stone bar.” Montgomery v. Emig, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3608 (D. Del. Jan. 8, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.