ID: DV NCO denies def standing in premises

Issuance of an NCO on defendant denies him standing when he was found in the premises he was ordered from. He has no reasonable expectation of privacy once ordered away. Prior cases in accord are not overruled. State v. Ortiz, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 2 (Jan. 8, 2025).

An officer patrolling a high crime area at a motel on request of the owner because of drug deals and trespassing on the parking lot had reasonable suspicion. He saw defendant, engaged in a conversation which suggested he was there without any justification. He said he was meeting a friend but was unsure of the name and was waiting for her to come out. He admitted he’d just gotten out of the pen for bank robbery, and the officer saw a gun and high capacity drum magazine in the car. United States v. Cole, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 430 (5th Cir. Jan. 8, 2025).*

An identified informant has some built-in reliability. United States v. Jones, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3800 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 8, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.