E.D.Tex.: Suppression not remedy for knock-and-announce violation

Suppression is not the remedy for a knock-and-announce violation. United States v. Bello, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236255 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 2024),* adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2332 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2025).*

Defendant had no standing to question the search of another person’s cell phone. Davis v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3668 (N.D. Miss. Jan. 8, 2025).*

Plaintiff’s arrest was based on the best possible information, and it was with probable cause. Garfias v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3615 (D. Or. Jan. 6, 2025).*

“But Deputy Gampfer’s investigation mistakenly linked Castellanos to the shady businessmen and snowballed into his misidentification, arrest, and two nights in jail. Although Deputy Gampfer’s investigation was less-than-ideal, his mistakes do not defeat the protection of qualified immunity.” Castellanos v. Gampfer, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3770 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 8, 2025).

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Knock and announce, Qualified immunity, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.