W.D.N.Y.: The fact the issuing magistrate read fast didn’t mean he wasn’t neutral and detached

The fact the issuing magistrate had to read 65 pages in 21 minutes doesn’t mean he wasn’t neutral and detached. “The Court is not persuaded by Defendant’s assessment of Judge Morrison’s reading speed, which relies wholly on speculation.” United States v. Washington, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205386 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 12, 2024).

It wasn’t an arrest until defendant was ordered from the vehicle. The stop was reasonably prolonged with reasonable suspicion. United States v. Bruma, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205099 (N.D. Ind. Nov. 12, 2024).*

“The record supports the circuit court’s finding of fact that Burrell consented to the search of his cell phone when he handed over the phone to Detective Mayer. In addition, the circuit court expressly rejected Burrell’s testimony about his encounter with Detective Mayer. Consequently, given Detective Mayer’s credible testimony, the circuit court was not plainly wrong or without evidence when it found that Burrell consented to the search of his cell phone. Therefore, the circuit court did not err when it denied Burrell’s motion to suppress the evidence obtained from his cell phone because Burrell consented to the search.” Burrell v. Commonwealth, 2024 Va. App. LEXIS 651 (Nov. 12, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Consent, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.