TX5: Failure to swear an oath or affirmation before the issuing judge was fatal to warrant

Failure to swear an oath or affirmation before the issuing judge was fatal to this warrant. He signed it but didn’t acknowledge swearing to it. “the Court of Criminal Appeals has specifically explained that ‘to convey the solemnity and critical nature of being truthful,’ Texas law requires that ‘the oath must be made ‘before’ or in the presence of another.’” Moreover, the good faith exception does not apply. State v. Hardridge, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 4126 (Tex. App. – Dallas June 16, 2025).

Defendant consented to a patdown before getting in the police car for a courtesy ride. Hall v. State, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 4677 (Fla. 5th DCA June 18, 2025).*

“Turning to Defendant’s [Franks] challenge, he does not identify any statement by any affiant that is purportedly false, misleading, or made with reckless disregard for the truth. … This alone constitutes reason enough to deny his request for a Franks hearing.” United States v. Dewberry, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116473 (S.D. Ohio June 18, 2025).*

Defendant doesn’t show how the challenged statement is false in context. Franks hearing denied. United States v. Chattams, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116479 (S.D. Ohio June 18, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.