Category Archives: Seizure

D.N.J.: Residual smell of MJ can still provide PC

“The Officers testified the smell of marijuana can remain in the area, or linger on clothing or other items, after marijuana is removed from the area, before or after it has been smoked. … It can also be difficult to … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Residual smell of MJ can still provide PC

OH5: “Red screen” on patrol car’s computer screen was RS for def’s LPN

A “red screen” on the police car’s computer screen meant a serious warning about defendant’s LPN, and that justified the stop. State v. Cooper, 2023-Ohio-2897, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2881 (5th Dist. Aug. 18, 2023).* Blocking both ends of an … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH5: “Red screen” on patrol car’s computer screen was RS for def’s LPN

D.Neb.: Admitted state law jurisdiction violation still not 4A unreasonable

Despite the criminal charges being dropped because city officers were outside their jurisdiction, the whole matter was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment because reasonableness doesn’t depend on state law violations. Kosiba v. Kleine, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139379 (D. Neb. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Admitted state law jurisdiction violation still not 4A unreasonable

M.D.Fla.: A records preservation request to cell phone providers was not a seizure

A records preservation letter sent to cell phone providers was not a seizure, let alone an unreasonable one. The records were later secured by search warrant. United States v. Zwiefelhofer, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134679 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 2, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Seizure, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: A records preservation request to cell phone providers was not a seizure

Army: Affidavit for SW didn’t show why text messages would still be on def’s cell phone; but harmless error

The government did not show in the affidavit for search authorization that text messages would logically be found on his cell phone corroborating a sex crime victim. Nevertheless, he wasn’t prejudiced by it. United States v. Geranen, 2023 CCA LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Inventory, Seizure, Staleness | Comments Off on Army: Affidavit for SW didn’t show why text messages would still be on def’s cell phone; but harmless error

CA5: No police wrongdoing here to support “police created exigency”

Defendant came in to the police for an interview about sex assault in the Army. As it developed, exigency for seizure of defendant’s cell phone arose. This was not a police created exigency which requires some wrongdoing on the part … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: No police wrongdoing here to support “police created exigency”

CA3 adopts two part functional rule of private search, and this one was

Defendant’s wife was not acting as an agent of the state when she procured defendant’s cell phone which produced evidence of sexual exploitation of a child. “Four of our sister Courts of Appeals assess whether a private party was an … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on CA3 adopts two part functional rule of private search, and this one was

D.C.Cir.: ‘“Let me see your waistband’–amounted to a show of authority.”

“Here, Officer Tejada initially approached Gamble and asked him a question: ‘Ain’t got no gun on you, man?’” ‘“Let me see your waistband’–amounted to a show of authority.” United States v. Gamble, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 19695 (D.C.Cir. Aug. 1, … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: ‘“Let me see your waistband’–amounted to a show of authority.”

RI: Officer doesn’t need to state a reason for occupants to get out of car under Mimms

Under Mimms, the occupants can be ordered out of the car during a stop. The fact the trial judge disagreed with the three rationales offered for it by the officer doesn’t matter. State v. Li, 2023 R.I. LEXIS 90 (July … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on RI: Officer doesn’t need to state a reason for occupants to get out of car under Mimms

D.Nev.: Request of internet provider to preserve evidence under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f) is not a seizure

“Here, the Court finds that Omegle and TextNow’s preservation of evidence in response to the Government’s request under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f)—a provision of the Stored Communications Act—did not violate the Fourth Amendment for two reasons. First, because the preservation … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Request of internet provider to preserve evidence under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f) is not a seizure

OH8: Dog alert on a car permits search of containers in it

A dog alert on a car was probable cause for a search of it and containers, here a backpack. State v. Kumuhone, 2023-Ohio-2586, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2554 (8th Dist. July 27, 2023). “The contemporaneous tip, the visual details that … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Foreign searches, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Seizure | Comments Off on OH8: Dog alert on a car permits search of containers in it

CA6: Unintended target of a police shooting, another officer, has a 4A seizure and excessive force claim

One officer fired a gun at a suspect inside a dwelling, apparently without aiming, and hit another officer. That was still a Fourth Amendment seizure of the person of the officer despite being an unintended target. Kilnapp v. City of … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Unintended target of a police shooting, another officer, has a 4A seizure and excessive force claim

W.D.Mich.: Differing possessory interest claims in state and then federal court is estoppel

At a state show cause hearing, plaintiff disavowed any possessory or property interest in two pit bulls, so he’s estopped from claiming it in a § 1983 case over the dogs. Crandall v. Newaygo Cty., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104374 … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: Differing possessory interest claims in state and then federal court is estoppel

CA10: Despite SW’s overbreadth, executing officers understood the crime under investigation; GFE applies

The warrant was previously held overbroad and the case was remanded to the district court for findings on the good faith exception. In this second appeal, the good faith exception applies. The officers understood the limits in the warrant to … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: Despite SW’s overbreadth, executing officers understood the crime under investigation; GFE applies

LA4: State carries burden on inevitable discovery and it failed here

Here there was a warrantless entry into the house for a gun. Defendant was in custody outside. The state had the burden on inevitable discovery and failed. “In the instant case, the state failed to point to any alternative lawful … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on LA4: State carries burden on inevitable discovery and it failed here

NY Co.: SW not timely executed is suppressed

Search warrants in NY have to be executed within ten days. This cell phone warrant wasn’t, so suppression is granted. The order is stayed so the state can decide whether to appeal. People v. Nurse, 2023 NY Slip Op 23167, … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY Co.: SW not timely executed is suppressed

VA: Later adopted statutory exclusionary rule not retroactive

A statutory exclusionary rule for a particular action that was adopted after the search and seizure was not retroactive. Moore v. Commonwealth, 2023 Va. App. LEXIS 343 (CMay 30, 2023) (unpublished).* The totality shows reasonable suspicion to extend the stop … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on VA: Later adopted statutory exclusionary rule not retroactive

NJ: Computer return of car owner’s suspended DL justified stop, but it had to end when it was obvious driver was not owner

A police car computer that tells the officer the owner of a vehicle has a suspended license is reasonable suspicion for a stop, unless there is objective evidence the driver cannot be the owner. Here, it was obvious the driver … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on NJ: Computer return of car owner’s suspended DL justified stop, but it had to end when it was obvious driver was not owner

CA6: Misstatements in arrest warrant affidavit didn’t prejudice ptr or prevent state trial

In this 2254, without citing Stone v. Powell, the court holds on the merits of the Fourth Amendment claim that misstatements in the arrest warrant affidavit did not prejudice the petitioner because it would not have prevented the trial. Harris … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Misstatements in arrest warrant affidavit didn’t prejudice ptr or prevent state trial

SD: Def not in custody during DNA SW when asked basic questions

Despite language difficulties, defendant did speak some English, enough to refer to erection difficulties, and he never indicated he didn’t understand. He was not in custody for Miranda purposes when he was asked some basic questions and volunteered information while … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Custody, Seizure | Comments Off on SD: Def not in custody during DNA SW when asked basic questions