Category Archives: Particularity

Cal.4: Drunk in public with a vehicle justifies a vehicle search under the automobile exception

Drunk in public with a vehicle justifies a vehicle search under the automobile exception. People v. Sims, 2021 Cal. App. LEXIS 33 (4th Dist. Jan. 12, 2021). A search warrant that resulted in a search where three buildings were on … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Particularity | Comments Off on Cal.4: Drunk in public with a vehicle justifies a vehicle search under the automobile exception

GA: Cell phone believed to be on def’s person at time of robbery and murder is subject for SW for evidence of the crimes

The affidavit for the warrant showed probable cause and particularity for search of defendant’s cell phone for evidence of an armed robbery and murder [essentially on the officer’s experience]. The trial court suppressed a pre-warrant search of defendant’s cell phone, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Particularity | Comments Off on GA: Cell phone believed to be on def’s person at time of robbery and murder is subject for SW for evidence of the crimes

E.D.Tenn.: Address wasn’t required where picture of property was in SW

Defendant’s address wasn’t included in the affidavit for the search warrant, but its picture was and there was no mistake on the place searched. That was sufficient. United States v. Lingo, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3861 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 8, … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Address wasn’t required where picture of property was in SW

CA11: Not IAC to not challenge recording jail calls

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging recording jail calls [actually stated as a 2254(d) failure]. Garcia v. Sec’y, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 314 (11th Cir. Jan. 6, 2021).* The CSLI warrant was particular and not a general warrant, and … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Informant hearsay, Particularity, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA11: Not IAC to not challenge recording jail calls

D.V.I.: Not showing target a “particularized list” of things to be seized doesn’t justify exclusion

Failure to tell the target of a search warrant or his lawyer who showed up what’s being seized by showing the warrant itself doesn’t justify applying the exclusionary rule. The attachments incorporated into the affidavit were present at the scene … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.V.I.: Not showing target a “particularized list” of things to be seized doesn’t justify exclusion

N.-M.: Broad cellphone search authorization was narrowed to emails and text messages and was particular

The command authorization for a search of defendant’s iPhone was reasonable and limited to files of emails, text messages, and search history as to his extramarital affairs before and after his wife’s death. A video found in an email was … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Military searches, Particularity | Comments Off on N.-M.: Broad cellphone search authorization was narrowed to emails and text messages and was particular

WY: Questions about travel plans are allowed to put trip in “context”

Basic questions about where defendant and his passenger were going were reasonable to put their trip into “context.” That led to reasonable suspicion. Pryce v. State, 2020 WY 151, 2020 Wyo. LEXIS 178 (Dec. 16, 2020). (And one could ask: … Continue reading

Posted in Digital Searches, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: Questions about travel plans are allowed to put trip in “context”

M.D.Pa.: Error in USPS tracking number of parcel in SW was a “mere technical error” when it was readily apparent they had right package

Error as to USPS tracking number in an anticipatory warrant wasn’t fatal and didn’t make the warrant not particular. All the other information was correct as to sender, recipient, description, and shipping location. This was a “mere technical error” that … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Particularity, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Error in USPS tracking number of parcel in SW was a “mere technical error” when it was readily apparent they had right package

TX14: SW for car with only color, 4 doors, and race and gender of driver in Houston was not particular

All the police had was the color of the sedan, its number of doors, and the race and gender of its driver to indicate that the sedan in the affidavit was the same sedan as the one seen in the … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on TX14: SW for car with only color, 4 doors, and race and gender of driver in Houston was not particular

CA6: SW with wrong address and color of building was still particular enough in location

The search warrant was wrong on the address and colors of the place to be searched. Following the description in the warrant, however, led to only one building: The place searched. The officer involved was there to ensure it was … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on CA6: SW with wrong address and color of building was still particular enough in location

TX: Totality of affidavit justified on totality SW for surveillance videos even though affidavit didn’t explicitly say so

While the affidavit for search warrant didn’t explicitly say that it wanted the DVR for surveillance cameras to prove a crime at the business, the totality of the affidavit leaves the impression from common knowledge that seizure and search was … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX: Totality of affidavit justified on totality SW for surveillance videos even though affidavit didn’t explicitly say so

W.D.Tex.: “Laundry list” argument of a lack of particularity rejected

The officer affiant corroborated the CI’s information and there was substantial evidence of probable cause. The affidavit was not bare bones. Even if the affidavit lacked probable cause, the good faith exception applies. Defendant’s “laundry list” argument of a lack … Continue reading

Posted in General warrant, Particularity | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: “Laundry list” argument of a lack of particularity rejected

TX: SW for forensic evidence in def’s truck was particular enough

Defendant was convicted of capital murder in the death of a police officer. He and his vehicle were linked by probable cause to the shooting. The search warrant was sufficiently particular for his truck for forensic evidence of the shooting. … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on TX: SW for forensic evidence in def’s truck was particular enough

E.D.Pa.: When dwelling was found to be multi-unit, the search was limited to the proper one; ER should not be applied because the officer acted in complete good faith

Defendant failed to make a substantial preliminary showing for Franks purposes that the officer recklessly disregarded the fact there could be two residential units in the building he was seeking the search warrant for. He reviewed property records and Google … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: When dwelling was found to be multi-unit, the search was limited to the proper one; ER should not be applied because the officer acted in complete good faith

N.D.Ill. issues a geofence warrant to Google

This geofence warrant is issued with probable cause and it is particular because it is so limited in time and scope. In re Search Warrant Application for Geofence Location Data Stored at Google Concerning an Arson Investigation, 2020 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ill. issues a geofence warrant to Google

TX5: HIPAA doesn’t create REP in blood toxicology for medical treatment later used in DUI

HIPAA doesn’t create a reasonable expectation of privacy in one’s blood sample obtained for medical treatment. HIPAA recognizes criminal process to obtain it. Consuelo v. State, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 8460 (Tex. App. – Dallas Oct. 27, 2020). Any lack … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Particularity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX5: HIPAA doesn’t create REP in blood toxicology for medical treatment later used in DUI

CO: cert. gr.: Whether cell phone details beyond number obtained by illegal arrest should be suppressed; or, is cell phone number particular enough?

“Whether the court of appeals erred in determining that the warrant to search Petitioner’s cell phone and supporting affidavit satisfied the Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement, where all descriptive information about the phone except the telephone number was obtained as a … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Cell phones, Particularity, Waiver | Comments Off on CO: cert. gr.: Whether cell phone details beyond number obtained by illegal arrest should be suppressed; or, is cell phone number particular enough?

CA6: Officer executing a state arrest warrant doesn’t have to independently verify its validity

Defendant contended that the officer executing an invalid state arrest warrant had a duty to verify the validity of the warrant before executing it. He didn’t, and the officer acted in otherwise good faith. Therefore, the exclusionary rule would not … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule, Particularity | Comments Off on CA6: Officer executing a state arrest warrant doesn’t have to independently verify its validity

M.D.Fla.: Scrivener’s error as to property to be seized was cured in context

A scrivener’s error as to alleged vagueness in the property to be searched and seized was cured in context of the documents. United States v. Carter, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168543 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 15, 2020). Defendant’s blocking the street … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Scrivener’s error as to property to be seized was cured in context

W.D.Mo.: Mask ordinance doesn’t violate 4A right of privacy

The City of Springfield mask ordinance does not violate, inter alia, the Fourth Amendment right to privacy. Shelton v. City of Springfield, 6:20-cv-03258 (W.D. Mo. Sept. 2, 2020). “In specifically detailing the criminal conduct under investigation, the search warrants provide … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Reasonableness, Scope of search | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Mask ordinance doesn’t violate 4A right of privacy