CO: cert. gr.: Whether cell phone details beyond number obtained by illegal arrest should be suppressed; or, is cell phone number particular enough?

“Whether the court of appeals erred in determining that the warrant to search Petitioner’s cell phone and supporting affidavit satisfied the Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement, where all descriptive information about the phone except the telephone number was obtained as a result of Petitioner’s unlawful arrest.” Pettigrew v. People, 2020 Colo. LEXIS 888 (Sept. 28, 2020).* [Probably no. The phone number alone is probably going to be enough to get the warrant.]

Defendant’s guilty plea waived his Fourth Amendment claim. Lynn v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177689 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 7, 2020).*

The body camera showed defendant was probably driving under the influence. United States v. Williams, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 30810 (5th Cir. Sept. 28, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Body cameras, Cell phones, Particularity, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.