Category Archives: Arrest or entry on arrest

CA2: PC and innocence of the crime charged are different things; a search incident to arrest can still be valid

Officers had probable cause to arrest for possession of marijuana despite the fact it later turned out he was innocent of possession. The inventory of his backpack was still valid. United States v. Bignon, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 15972 (2d … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA2: PC and innocence of the crime charged are different things; a search incident to arrest can still be valid

CA6: Ptf stated claim for unreasonable continued detention after state’s case collapsed when forensic search of computer came up negative

Plaintiff was arrested for child pornography when officers executed a search warrant at his house based on a video uploaded via the IP address and router in the house. There was probable cause for the arrest, but not for the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Computer and cloud searches, Overseizure | Comments Off on CA6: Ptf stated claim for unreasonable continued detention after state’s case collapsed when forensic search of computer came up negative

CA11: Shooting passenger in a car used as a weapon unreasonable

Shooting a passenger in a car that was allegedly used as a weapon was unreasonable because the passenger had no control over the car and his shooting wouldn’t stop the car. Robinson v. Rankin, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 15297 (11th … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA11: Shooting passenger in a car used as a weapon unreasonable

CA7: Even though the 4A was complied with, if the question is relevance or prejudice, a motion in limine is proper, not a motion to suppress

Just because the Fourth Amendment was complied with doesn’t mean that the evidence seized is relevant (Rule 401) or the evidence could be more prejudicial than relevant (Rule 403). Then, suppression isn’t the remedy – a motion in limine is. … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Arrest or entry on arrest, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA7: Even though the 4A was complied with, if the question is relevance or prejudice, a motion in limine is proper, not a motion to suppress

MA: DNA swab taken by consent during arrest without PC is suppressed, but state can do it over on remand

Defendant was arrested for murder, handcuffed and taken in for interrogation, all without probable cause. His statement was suppressed, and the state fails to show that obtaining his buccal swab during this time would clear even the low bar for … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA | Comments Off on MA: DNA swab taken by consent during arrest without PC is suppressed, but state can do it over on remand

HI: Repeated announcement outside tent before entry with SW satisfied knock-and-announce requirement; def was hearing impaired and slept through it

Defendant lived in a park in a “tent,” under a tarp with gaps that officers could somewhat see inside. Officers had a search warrant and they announced loudly several times their office and purpose. There was no door to knock … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Knock and announce | Comments Off on HI: Repeated announcement outside tent before entry with SW satisfied knock-and-announce requirement; def was hearing impaired and slept through it

E.D.Mich.: Innocent explanations for pole camera evidence to get SW didn’t make a Franks challenge because there still was PC

Defendant’s innocent explanations for what pole camera videos showed that were not in the affidavit for search warrant do not amount to a Franks challenge. There still was probable cause. United States v. Joye, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66463 (E.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Pole cameras, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Innocent explanations for pole camera evidence to get SW didn’t make a Franks challenge because there still was PC

KY: Detaining bystanders to facilitate the arrest of one was reasonable

State case law already permits officers to detain bystanders for a reasonable period for officer safety in execution of search warrants. The court adopts the Sixth Circuit rule and extends it to arrest warrants, too. “We hold that detaining Constant … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Particularity | Comments Off on KY: Detaining bystanders to facilitate the arrest of one was reasonable

TX2: SW for seizure of blood includes the ability to analyze it

It is well settled in Texas that a search warrant for blood in a DUI case includes the ability to analyze it. Jacobson v. State, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 3447 (Tex. App. – Ft. Worth Apr. 23, 2020). Defendant’s CSLI … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Scope of search, Standards of review | Comments Off on TX2: SW for seizure of blood includes the ability to analyze it

CA6: One day detention without finding of PC valid under Gerstein and Riverside

Plaintiffs’ one day detention without a finding of probable cause failed to state a claim under Gerstein and County of Riverside. That is still presumptively reasonable. Cox v. City of Jackson, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 13124 (6th Cir. Apr. 22, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA6: One day detention without finding of PC valid under Gerstein and Riverside

HI: No prior showing of PC is required for a penal summons

No prior showing of probable cause is required for a penal summons because there is no arrest or custody under Gerstein v. Pugh. State v. Thompson, 2020 Haw. App. LEXIS 151 (Apr. 24, 2020). The district court properly denied qualified … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force | Comments Off on HI: No prior showing of PC is required for a penal summons

NC: Flipping off officer not disorderly conduct; stop suppressed

Flipping off the officer wasn’t disorderly conduct justifying the stop. The community caretaking function also does not apply. State v. Ellis, 2020 N.C. LEXIS 363 (May 1, 2020). The state could not show that defendant’s statements were inevitably discovered from … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Community caretaking function, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on NC: Flipping off officer not disorderly conduct; stop suppressed

CA9: County of Riverside v. McLaughlin’s 48 hour rule does not apply to parole holds

County of Riverside v. McLaughlin’s 48 hour rule does not apply to parole holds. Benson v. Chappell, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 14035 (9th Cir. May 1, 2020). There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop, but the officer’s opening the car … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Search | Comments Off on CA9: County of Riverside v. McLaughlin’s 48 hour rule does not apply to parole holds

FL2: Search incident of backpack for being in park after hours invalid

Defendant was stopped for sitting in a park with his bicycle after hours, a violation of a county ordinance. The search incident of his backpack for this offense violated the Florida Constitution. Booker v. State, 2020 Fla. App. LEXIS 5718 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Search incident | Comments Off on FL2: Search incident of backpack for being in park after hours invalid

AR: Drug dog at scene while warning ticket being written didn’t extend stop

This dog sniff did not extend the stop where the dog arrived while the warning ticket was being written. Mickens v. State, 2020 Ark. App. 280, 2020 Ark. App. LEXIS 307 (Apr. 29, 2020). The blood draw of the unconscious … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AR: Drug dog at scene while warning ticket being written didn’t extend stop

OH5: Trial judge signing SW wasn’t ground to recuse

The trial judge having signed a search warrant wasn’t grounds to recuse at trial. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising it. The validity of the search wasn’t even an issue. State v. Ray, 2020-Ohio-1265, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 1197 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on OH5: Trial judge signing SW wasn’t ground to recuse

IL: Pill bottle wasn’t a weapon, and removing it from pocket in a weapons frisk was unreasonable

The officer stopped after he believed defendant shouted an obscenity at him. When the officer looked at defendant, he spit in the officer’s direction. The patdown thereafter was without reasonable suspicion. The removal of a round cylindrical object from his … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Pill bottle wasn’t a weapon, and removing it from pocket in a weapons frisk was unreasonable

E.D.Wis.: IAC shown for failure to move to suppress arrest in own home

Defendant satisfied his burden of showing ineffective assistance of counsel for defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress that the entry into the house violated the Fourth Amendment and this tainted defendant’s consent. There is no strategic reason … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: IAC shown for failure to move to suppress arrest in own home

D.Mass.: Renter of car who loaned it out still had standing in the car

Defendant rented a car in his name two weeks before the search. He had standing in the car when somebody borrowed it and was stopped. The court declines to find that the dog handler cued the dog. Audio of a … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Renter of car who loaned it out still had standing in the car

FL3: No PC for arrest of person closest to the drugs without knowing his relation to the property

There was no probable cause to arrest defendant just because he was the one nearest to the drugs when the police came in. There was no consideration of his relationship to the premises in the face of the law of … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on FL3: No PC for arrest of person closest to the drugs without knowing his relation to the property