Category Archives: Cell phones

AZ: A traffic offense could be used to stop defendant to question him about a fatal accident 11 days earlier

Defendant committed a traffic offense and was stopped. Officers had reasonable suspicion he left the scene of a fatal accident 11 days earlier, and officers wanted to talk to him about that. The stop was not pretextual because there was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force | Comments Off on AZ: A traffic offense could be used to stop defendant to question him about a fatal accident 11 days earlier

TX12: Texas livestock officer lacked general law enforcement powers

A special ranger employed by the Texas & Southwest Cattle Raisers Association (TSCRA) recognized as part of the Texas DPS held himself out to be a law enforcement officer. Special rangers are limited to livestock and limited offenses. Instead, he … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on TX12: Texas livestock officer lacked general law enforcement powers

OH4: Return of cell phone denied; it’s still potential evidence, and part of delay is refusing to give passcode

“Based on our review of the record, we find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Smith’s motion for return of his electronic devices. At the time of Smith’s request, it appears that the property was still … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Privileges, Standing | Comments Off on OH4: Return of cell phone denied; it’s still potential evidence, and part of delay is refusing to give passcode

D.Mass.: Four-month delay in searching lawfully seized cell phone here not unreasonable

Four month delay in searching cell phones after lawfully seizing them was not unreasonable. “Defendant relies primarily on United States v. Smith, a Second Circuit case. … There, in assessing whether a thirty-one day delay between police seizing a tablet … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Probable cause, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Four-month delay in searching lawfully seized cell phone here not unreasonable

W.D.Pa.: Police officer can answer a dropped cell phone without violating 4A; that’s not a search

“Similarly, where an officer is legitimately in possession of a cell phone dropped at the scene of a crime and observes, in plain view, an incoming call arriving on the cell phone, the officer may lawfully answer the incoming call … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Police officer can answer a dropped cell phone without violating 4A; that’s not a search

CA6: Cell phone SW affidavit relying on officer’s experience was sufficient on GFE, even if PC was lacking

Defendant was a suspect in robberies, and when he was arrested, there was a cell phone at his feet. There was no direct link to the cell phone and the robberies. The affidavit relied on the officer’s experience [of course] … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA6: Cell phone SW affidavit relying on officer’s experience was sufficient on GFE, even if PC was lacking

M.D.Ga.: Cell phone search started before SW’s completion date isn’t unreasonable

The fact execution of the warrant on defendant’s cell phone took longer than the time limitation in the warrant doesn’t justify suppression if the search process started before its expiration. United States v. Hewlett, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189371 (M.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: Cell phone search started before SW’s completion date isn’t unreasonable

M.D.Fla.: T.L.O. informs the use of handcuffs in school v. excessive force

T.L.O. informs the use of handcuffs in school v. excessive force. Here, the student was objectively enough of a safety risk to justify handcuffs. “Further, because the Fourth Amendment reasonableness inquiry is an objective standard, more discovery to determine Defendants’ … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: T.L.O. informs the use of handcuffs in school v. excessive force

E.D.N.Y.: RS required for non-routine customs cell phone search

An Italian businessman with business in Luxembourg and investment in the United States had his cell phone seized without reasonable suspicion at JFK and searched elsewhere. Reasonable suspicion is required for a non-routine cell phone search, and the data taken … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: RS required for non-routine customs cell phone search

OH2: Arrest clothes in jail storage can be searched without a warrant

Under established authority from 1993 in this court, defendant’s clothes from his arrest in storage at the jail can be tested for evidence without a warrant. State v. Wells, 2024-Ohio-4813 (2d Dist. Oct. 4, 2024). Defendant pled guilty and only … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Inventory, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OH2: Arrest clothes in jail storage can be searched without a warrant

CO: Unlawfully obtained cell phone PIN used to search phone required suppression

The police unlawfully obtained defendant’s cell phone’s 6-digit PIN number to access his phone after a failed “brute force attack” attempting to get into the phone. That required suppression of the cell phone. People v. d’Estree, 2024 COA 106, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CO: Unlawfully obtained cell phone PIN used to search phone required suppression

MO: Def fled state and abandoned murder weapon at his grandmother’s house

When defendant fled the state to avoid arrest, he left a bag with the murder weapon at his grandmother’s house. That was abandonment. The ping of his cell phone to locate him to arrest him was with exigent circumstances. State … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Seizure | Comments Off on MO: Def fled state and abandoned murder weapon at his grandmother’s house

D.Minn.: A cell phone tracking order was permitted where there was an arrest warrant for defendant

“Despite a dearth of binding precedent, this Court is satisfied that the existence of an active arrest warrant provides a sufficient basis for a magistrate judge to find probable cause to issue a tracking warrant allowing law enforcement to monitor … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Inventory, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Minn.: A cell phone tracking order was permitted where there was an arrest warrant for defendant

FL4: REP in Facebook private messages

(1) Florida’s 4th DCA finds a reasonable expectation of privacy in Facebook private messages as analogous to cell phone text messages. (2) When the records were seized under a warrant for a theft, they couldn’t be searched for evidence of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Scope of search, Social media warrants | Comments Off on FL4: REP in Facebook private messages

NE: Not IAC to not challenge state’s obtaining phone records

It was settled in this state long ago that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in third-party cell phone records. Therefore, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging it. State v. Rush, 317 Neb. 622 (Sep. 20, 2024).* On … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NE: Not IAC to not challenge state’s obtaining phone records

N.D.Ind.: Cell phones are “tools of the trade” of drug dealing, so nexus is minimal [actually, practically non-existent]

While cell phones are “tools of the trade” of drug dealing, they usually can be swept up in a search warrant for the premises. While that works in drug cases, there should be caution in other types of cases. United … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Cell phones are “tools of the trade” of drug dealing, so nexus is minimal [actually, practically non-existent]

CA6: Electronic devices were “property under his control” subject to search while on supervised release

Defendant’s electronic devices were “property under his control” subject to search while on supervised release. United States v. Ramadan, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23276 (6th Cir. Sep. 11, 2024). Plaintiff pleads an unreasonable strip search in prison, but the necessary … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Strip search | Comments Off on CA6: Electronic devices were “property under his control” subject to search while on supervised release

TN: Def opened door to admit suppressed cell phone evidence by asking the one question too many

Defendant successfully kept out cell phone tracking records for lack of probable cause. “However, during trial, based on defense counsel’s question of whether there was any ‘physical evidence’ connecting Defendant to the case, the trial court ruled that Defendant opened … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Custody, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: Def opened door to admit suppressed cell phone evidence by asking the one question too many

MN: Order for buccal swab during pendency of case requires SW

A search warrant is required for a buccal swab after a criminal case is proceeding. State v. Steeprock, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 345 (July 29, 2024); State v. Jones, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 412 (Aug. 29, 2024). The search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, DNA, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on MN: Order for buccal swab during pendency of case requires SW

M.D.Pa.: Def’s Franks challenge fails for being vague as to what was inadequate and even which warrants were being challenged

“First, on a fundamental level, Bressi’s Franks request is insufficiently specific for this Court to reconstruct the warrants. Bressi does not point to a specific search warrant he claims was obtained through Agent O’Malley’s intentional or reckless disregard for the … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Def’s Franks challenge fails for being vague as to what was inadequate and even which warrants were being challenged