Category Archives: Cell phones

NY3: SW for evidence of robbery (stolen property and mask) found def’s cell phone with image of him wearing the mask on its wallpaper

A search warrant in a robbery case looked for stolen property and the mask involved. When police executed the warrant, they found his cell phone with him wearing the mask as the wallpaper image on the phone. “We find without … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on NY3: SW for evidence of robbery (stolen property and mask) found def’s cell phone with image of him wearing the mask on its wallpaper

NY4: Cell phone SW suppressed for no showing of PC or particularity

“Here, the search warrant authorized and directed the police to search for, inter alia, ‘cellular phones (including contents)’ located in defendant’s vehicle. Significantly, the search was not restricted by reference to any particular crime. Thus, the search warrant failed to … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY4: Cell phone SW suppressed for no showing of PC or particularity

DE: Def counsel’s failure to challenge PC and particularity in cell phone search warrants post-conviction relief

Defendant sufficiently stated grounds for ineffective assistance of counsel from defense counsel’s failure to challenge the search warrant for lack of probable cause and particularity. “Postconviction relief due to ineffectiveness of counsel must be granted in circumstances where the Court … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Custody, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on DE: Def counsel’s failure to challenge PC and particularity in cell phone search warrants post-conviction relief

NC: Wife had sufficient common authority over cell phone to consent to seizure and search

Defendant allowed his cell phone to be used by everyone in the family, including his child to watch YouTube videos. His wife had sufficient common authority to consent to a seizure and search. State v. Duran-Rivas, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Wife had sufficient common authority over cell phone to consent to seizure and search

CA10: State SW for place in Indian country was done in good faith and is not suppressed

A state search warrant issued by a Tulsa state judge for a place in Indian country was done in good faith at the time under McGirt and would not be suppressed. United States v. Bailey, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 15210 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA10: State SW for place in Indian country was done in good faith and is not suppressed

Reason: Baltimore Brings Back Controversial Cellphone Hacking System

Reason: Baltimore Brings Back Controversial Cellphone Hacking System by Matthew Petti (“Cellebrite is a dream come true for police surveillance. Plug in any cellphone, even a locked one, and get a full report of every file on its hard drive. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Reason: Baltimore Brings Back Controversial Cellphone Hacking System

W.D.Ky.: State law alleged defects in warrant process not applicable in federal court without showing why suppression is an appropriate remedy

A state search warrant was used to prosecute in federal court. Defendant raised numerous state law defects to the warrant that did not constitute Fourth Amendment violations. “Even if these warrants were procedurally deficient under state law, Gray has supplied … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: State law alleged defects in warrant process not applicable in federal court without showing why suppression is an appropriate remedy

E.D.N.Y.: There was RS for def’s border cell phone search for drug importation

While the law isn’t completely clear on the justification for a cell phone search at the border, the justification for either standard is satisfied. There was clearly reasonable suspicion of drug importing at JFK for search of his cell phone. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Border search, Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: There was RS for def’s border cell phone search for drug importation

D.Minn.: Parole cell phone search under MN law was reasonable under 4A

Defendant’s parole cell phone search under Minnesota law was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Guevara, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100403 (D. Minn. June 6, 2024). Driving one’s car to controlled buys gives probable cause for the vehicle. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Parole cell phone search under MN law was reasonable under 4A

S.D.Ind.: GFE of law at the time of the search meant no IAC

“Counsel did not perform deficiently when they raised the Fourth Amendment argument [under applicable law at the time], even though this Court and the Seventh Circuit found that the good faith applied.” Castro-Aguirre v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: GFE of law at the time of the search meant no IAC

Cal.1: GFE applied to probation search term

The good faith exception applied to defendant’s probation search. The officer checked and reasonably concluded that defendant was still on searchable probation at the time. People v. Pritchett, 2024 Cal. App. LEXIS 348 (1st Dist. May 8, 2024), certified for … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search, Search incident, Strip search | Comments Off on Cal.1: GFE applied to probation search term

D.Nev.: A website’s cookies linked def’s personal email address for nexus

In a criminal copyright case, cookies on website led to defendant’s business and personal email accounts, and that gave nexus to them for the warrant. “Under the totality of the circumstances, the Court finds that the search warrant reveals a … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Nexus, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Nev.: A website’s cookies linked def’s personal email address for nexus

C.D.Cal.: PC not shown for Jan. 6th target’s cell phone in California three years later

The government sought search warrants for cell phones in California in 2024 for six alleged misdemeanors at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. The court finds no probable cause to believe that there is evidence on the phones three … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Staleness | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: PC not shown for Jan. 6th target’s cell phone in California three years later

OH5: Cell phone SW was not particular, GFE doesn’t apply, but harmless after all

The cell phone search warrant here failed particularity: “permitted a sweeping, comprehensive search of Hikec’s cell phone with no meaningful limits”, and the good faith exception doesn’t apply. On this record, however, it was harmless error in light of other … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on OH5: Cell phone SW was not particular, GFE doesn’t apply, but harmless after all

MA: Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant

Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant to get them. “Despite the narrowing of the third-party doctrine in other contexts, it remains applicable to call detail records. Notwithstanding recent technological changes, the phone numbers an individual dials are … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Seizure, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on MA: Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant

AR: RS def rented a hotel room was sufficient for search waiver; PC not required

For determining whether the place searched, here a hotel room, is a probationer’s for a search waiver, reasonable suspicion and not probable cause is the standard to be applied. State v. Bailey, 2024 Ark. 87, 2024 Ark. LEXIS 74 (May … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AR: RS def rented a hotel room was sufficient for search waiver; PC not required

LA5: No standing to challenge search of shooting victim’s cell phone in def’s possession

Defendant lacked standing to challenge the search of his shooting victim’s cell phone. Also, by statute the search of the phone more than 10 days after seizure was reasonable. State v. Lowry, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 804 (La. App. 5 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on LA5: No standing to challenge search of shooting victim’s cell phone in def’s possession

D.Md.: Def voluntarily entered passcode into phone where there was a SW for his face and fingerprint to open it

Police had a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone and face and fingerprint to open it. He remained silent. They got past the first step and the phone asked for the passcode. He entered the first four digits without prompting … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Community caretaking function, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.Md.: Def voluntarily entered passcode into phone where there was a SW for his face and fingerprint to open it

D.Utah: Police slow walked traffic stop without RS

“The court concludes the officers delayed the stop beyond what the traffic-based mission reasonably demanded, both 1) as a result of a mistakes and a lack of reasonable diligence, and 2) to investigate their suspicions about Said and Saul. These … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Utah: Police slow walked traffic stop without RS

DC: Lights, coming out of car with hand on gun, and “Let me see your hands” was a seizure

This was a show of authority: “With the emergency lights activated, each officer exited the vehicle and yelled, ‘Let me see your hands’ and quickly approached Mr. Mitchell. Officer Phillip had a hand on her firearm while doing so. Officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Custody, Seizure | Comments Off on DC: Lights, coming out of car with hand on gun, and “Let me see your hands” was a seizure