CA10: State SW for place in Indian country was done in good faith and is not suppressed

A state search warrant issued by a Tulsa state judge for a place in Indian country was done in good faith at the time under McGirt and would not be suppressed. United States v. Bailey, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 15210 (10th Cir. June 24, 2024).

“The district court did not erroneously deny Kowalczyk’s motion to suppress evidence found during the search of his storage unit. Kowalczyk argues that the two-month delay between seizure of the storage unit and issuance of a search warrant was unreasonable. However, any error in admitting the evidence discovered during the search of the storage unit was harmless given the amount of other evidence that supported Kowalczyk’s conviction.” United States v. Kowalczyk, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 15342 (9th Cir. June 25, 2024).*

The affidavit for warrant may have been somewhat general on scope of this cell phone search, but the oral testimony in support was limited to a particular video. State v. McElroy, 2024 Ga. App. LEXIS 264 (June 25, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.