Category Archives: Informant hearsay

VI: Multiple falsities about CI made successful Franks challenge

Defendant succeeded in his Franks challenge on misleading statements about the CI as an observer rather than participant in the crime and the affidavit lacked corroborating investigative facts and omitted information about W1’s lies. All this was material to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on VI: Multiple falsities about CI made successful Franks challenge

E.D.N.Y.: Anonymous report of man threatening others with a gun didn’t provide RS

The anonymous report about a man threatening others in Queens adequately described defendant but it provided nothing to show that there was a crime in the offing. The stop and search was without reasonable suspicion. “On this record, it is … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Anonymous report of man threatening others with a gun didn’t provide RS

C.D.Cal.: Running criminal history of passenger unreasonably prolonged the stop

The stop was valid, but the stop was unreasonably prolonged without reasonable suspicion when running the criminal history of the passenger. That was not part of the incidents of the traffic stop. The frisk was also unreasonable. Also, “The Court … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Running criminal history of passenger unreasonably prolonged the stop

ID: DV NCO denies def standing in premises

Issuance of an NCO on defendant denies him standing when he was found in the premises he was ordered from. He has no reasonable expectation of privacy once ordered away. Prior cases in accord are not overruled. State v. Ortiz, … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on ID: DV NCO denies def standing in premises

C.D.Cal.: Warehouse used as a residence required admin. warrant for fire inspection

A fire inspection of a warehouse that was being used as a residence was subject to the administrative warrant requirement. No exception applies. Hannan v. L.A. Cty. Fire Dep’t, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 235999 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2024). 2254 … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Warehouse used as a residence required admin. warrant for fire inspection

CA4: Ditching backpack when hiding from police was abandonment

Defendant abandoned his backpack when he ditched it in a motel stairwell when he was fleeing the police. United States v. Mayberry, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 300 (4th Cir. Jan. 7, 2025). Leaving one’s backpack and a trashbag in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA4: Ditching backpack when hiding from police was abandonment

W.D.Wash.: Hypothetical 4A violation from civil investigative demand doesn’t confer Art. III standing

Hypothetical future Fourth Amendment injury from a state AG’s civil investigative demand doesn’t confer Art. III standing. Obria Grp., Inc. v. Ferguson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1166 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 3, 2025). “Here, a common-sense review of the warrant affidavit … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Standing, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Hypothetical 4A violation from civil investigative demand doesn’t confer Art. III standing

D.Minn.: Disavowing ownership of the thing seized means no standing

“Here, Jackson appears to have denied any possessory interest in the SUV and the backpack. (Dkt. 22 ¶ 7 (‘Jackson was not the registered owner of the vehicle. He further claims all of the items in the vehicle and the … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Disavowing ownership of the thing seized means no standing

CA5: Where 4A claim undecided below, it doesn’t form basis for stay

In the appeal of Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland, posted here, the Fifth Circuit doesn’t rely on the undecided Fourth Amendment claim in deciding on a stay. 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 32565 (5th Cir. Dec. 23, 2024).* The … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Where 4A claim undecided below, it doesn’t form basis for stay

IA: Rental inspection ordinance not facially unconstitutional; administrative warrants required

The city’s rental property inspection ordinance does not fail under the state constitution’s search and seizure clause because it is not facially void in all circumstances. Administrative warrants can be obtained when there’s a proper showing. Singer v. City of … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Admissibility of evidence, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on IA: Rental inspection ordinance not facially unconstitutional; administrative warrants required

OH3: Going right into pockets was an invalid frisk

The state failed to prove the necessity for a stop and frisk because the video shows the officer going right into defendant’s pockets and not frisking. State v. Barnes, 2024-Ohio-5865, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 4519 (3d Dist. Dec. 16, 2024). … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Scope of search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH3: Going right into pockets was an invalid frisk

CA6: Pending state court action was place to bring 4A claim under Younger

A state court action was going on involving plaintiff and his wetlands in Michigan, and he was enjoined from certain things. After state inspectors took soil and water samples, he sued in federal court. Younger abstention applies, and the state … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Privileges, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA6: Pending state court action was place to bring 4A claim under Younger

E.D.Mo.: It was settled over 50 years ago that an officer could surreptitiously record a face-to-face conversation

“Bolden’s entire focus is on recordings between himself and an undercover federal agent who was outfitted with a covert recording device. The government is correct-Bolden’s argument is foreclosed by long-standing caselaw.” As in 1971. United States v. Bolden, 2024 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: It was settled over 50 years ago that an officer could surreptitiously record a face-to-face conversation

NY3: “Common sense” that a drug dealer might have evidence on his cell phone isn’t PC

Just because defendant was a suspected drug dealer, there wasn’t probable cause for searching his cell phone. “While [officer] Bruno recounted that there was a quantity of drugs found in the motel room, along with the two phones, he did … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NY3: “Common sense” that a drug dealer might have evidence on his cell phone isn’t PC

W.D.Mich.: Search and seizure Brady, even if there was one, wouldn’t change the outcome

Defendant makes a 2255 Brady claim about the information for his search and seizure. But, it doesn’t change the outcome. “Defendant fails to explain, and the Court fails to discern, how inclusion of the information Defendant sets forth in support … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: Search and seizure Brady, even if there was one, wouldn’t change the outcome

Leftovers

2255 petitioner fails to show grounds for a CoA from his search claims, without telling us the rationale. United States v. Renteria, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30239 (5th Cir. Nov. 26, 2024).* Defendant’s stop and frisk was without reasonable suspicion. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk, Strip search | Comments Off on Leftovers

CA2: No less intrusive measures requirement before seeking CSLI

“The CSLI and cell-site simulator warrants provided evidence of the general and specific location of one of Brown’s cell phones and, therefore, of Brown’s likely movements between his indictment and arrest. Brown contends that investigators procured these warrants by falsely … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA2: No less intrusive measures requirement before seeking CSLI

N.Y.Co.: Shareholders cannot bring a 4A claim on behalf of a corporation that isn’t a party

Shareholders cannot bring a Fourth Amendment claim on behalf of a corporation that isn’t a party. Elfand v. Adams, 2024 NY Slip Op 24289, 2024 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 19021 (N.Y. Co. Nov. 18, 2024). The CI’s information led to a … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on N.Y.Co.: Shareholders cannot bring a 4A claim on behalf of a corporation that isn’t a party

NM: Trial courts can raise search issues on their own

A trial judge in New Mexico noticed that there were an unusual number of suspect warrantless searches going unchallenged by the defense. She set suppression hearings and several cases were nolle prossed. A few survived to be heard. On certification … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Motion to suppress, Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings, Waiver | Comments Off on NM: Trial courts can raise search issues on their own

N.D.Iowa: DUI stop justifies search for open containers

Defendant’s DUI stop justified a search for open containers, and a firearm was validly found. United States v. Stuckey, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207801 (N.D. Iowa Nov. 15, 2024). Defendant moved to suppress a cell phone warrant at the border … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Informant hearsay, Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: DUI stop justifies search for open containers