Category Archives: Informant hearsay

IL: Circumstances made SW affidavit admissible at trial

The trial court abused its discretion in not permitting the defense to use the search warrant affidavit at trial that showed the warrant was targeting another person for other things other than what was found. The court cautions this may … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Circumstances made SW affidavit admissible at trial

E.D.Tenn.: 11 day delay in getting computer SW not unreasonable

Depending on how one counted the time between the seizure of the cell phone and the search warrant, it was either 3 or 11 days, and either is reasonable. United States v. Deakins, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6661 (E.D. Tenn. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: 11 day delay in getting computer SW not unreasonable

CA6: Anonymous tip shown reliable enough for probation search

This anonymous tip of criminality of a probationer was shown to be reliable enough for reasonable suspicion. United States v. Rogers, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 786 (6th Cir. Jan. 11, 2023). Defendant is accused of vandalizing the Anchorage Jewish Museum. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Anonymous tip shown reliable enough for probation search

IA: “Driving while black” rejected because stop was objectively reasonable

Defendant sought to cast his stop as pretextual and “driving while black,” but it’s rejected because the stop was objectively reasonable. “We conclude that while the officer’s actions placed Cyrus in a situation with an unarguable ‘moral and instinctive pressure[ … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Pretext | Comments Off on IA: “Driving while black” rejected because stop was objectively reasonable

OH8: Calling for drug dog after warning ticket issued unreasonably extended stop

“Regardless, Officer Ashenfelter acknowledged that the traffic violation investigation was completed at 11:10. He called for the canine unit at 11:12, and the canine unit arrived at 11:18 a.m. [¶] Thus, the evidence reflects that the officer, after completing his … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH8: Calling for drug dog after warning ticket issued unreasonably extended stop

OR: Even constitutional challenges need to be preserved below

Even constitutional challenges need to be preserved below. Jimenez v. Dep’t of Revenue, 370 Or. 543 (Dec. 15, 2022). The court does not find the officer’s testimony credible. He claimed he saw defendant with binoculars from 100′ away buying liquor … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OR: Even constitutional challenges need to be preserved below

CA6: 4A generally doesn’t apply to sentencing enhancements

“The Fourth Amendment does not apply to sentencing enhancements. … We have recognized a possible exception to this rule—when officers illegally seized the evidence for the very purpose of enhancing the defendant’s sentence—but Wyse makes no such allegation.” United States … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: 4A generally doesn’t apply to sentencing enhancements

D.S.C.: “The victim’s lack of cooperation alone does not vitiate probable cause.”

Once probable cause arose, “The victim’s lack of cooperation alone does not vitiate probable cause.” Ebersole v. Lex Co Pub. Defs. Office, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224874 (D.S.C. Nov. 22, 2022). The leaseholder was a co-resident and she had the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.S.C.: “The victim’s lack of cooperation alone does not vitiate probable cause.”

NY2: SW papers provided to GJ aren’t discoverable because of GJ secrecy

Defendant sought search warrant materials presented to the grand jury. Denied because of grand jury secrecy. Sculti v. Finley, 2022 NY Slip Op 06950, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6820 (2d Dept. Dec. 7, 2022). Defendant had no standing in … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NY2: SW papers provided to GJ aren’t discoverable because of GJ secrecy

NJ: CI’s identity not material to a civil case over arson

This is a subrogation claim over a fire caused by arson. Padilla was convicted. The civil case resulted in getting discovery of the DA’s file. After that, the name of a CI for a search warrant was sought, and it … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NJ: CI’s identity not material to a civil case over arson

MI: Automobile repair business is pervasively regulated

The trial court erred in suppressing the search of defendant’s automobile repair business which was a pervasively regulated business. The search was during the work week during regular hours and was for evidence of compliance with the Motor Vehicle Service … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Automobile repair business is pervasively regulated

SC: Exigency for CSLI was shooting victim left for dead and defendant was armed and dangerous

There was exigency for CSLI. “Thus, this was not a standard criminal investigation seeking cell phone data; rather, this request sought to address an ongoing emergency because Carter was potentially armed and dangerous, had been involved in a violent crime … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on SC: Exigency for CSLI was shooting victim left for dead and defendant was armed and dangerous

CA3: Fire scene search for potential spread was exigent

The fire department arrived at a kitchen stove fire in an apartment building that was out. Informed of a sparking stove, fireman suspected there could be a fire in the basement. In the basement they found faulty wiring but no … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Fire scene search for potential spread was exigent

N.D.Cal.: There’s almost always PC in the contents of a stolen car, such as something of owner’s

There is probable cause to believe that there’s evidence of the crime in a stolen car. “It follows on this record that at a minimum there was also probable cause to believe that evidence of those suspected crimes (either car … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: There’s almost always PC in the contents of a stolen car, such as something of owner’s

FL1: No REP in words blurted out in ER

Defendant’s blurting out that he’d murdered someone caught on bodycam in the ER wasn’t subject to suppression under the state communications privacy law because there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the utterance. Reed v. State, 2022 Fla. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL1: No REP in words blurted out in ER

MN: Reliable hearsay can be considered for PC

In determining probable cause, “reliable hearsay” may be considered. State v. Dixon, 2022 Minn. LEXIS 483 (Nov. 9, 2022). The question of lack of probable cause was not in the motion to suppress, but the trial court held there was, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Informant hearsay, Private search | Comments Off on MN: Reliable hearsay can be considered for PC

CA6: Officer’s mistake he’d worked with CI before not shown to be Franks violation

Officer’s mistake in saying he’d worked with CI before that proved false still wasn’t enough to show a Franks violation because it could just be an innocent mistake and not enough to undermine the probable cause. United States v. Duncan, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Officer’s mistake he’d worked with CI before not shown to be Franks violation

D.D.C.: When stop was extended without RS, def’s assault on officers was not attenuated under Brown

The court finds the stop without reasonable suspicion. It was allegedly justified by paper LPN that didn’t match the car as without reasonable suspicion because the tags weren’t run until after the stop. That and other factors don’t make reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.D.C.: When stop was extended without RS, def’s assault on officers was not attenuated under Brown

VI: Anonymous tip given observing altercation was sufficient for stop when substantially corroborated at scene

The detailed anonymous tip here was sufficient to support a stop when it was substantially corroborated at the scene. The caller observed an altercation in real time and described the two vehicles involved. It was at the top of a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VI: Anonymous tip given observing altercation was sufficient for stop when substantially corroborated at scene

N.D.Ind.: Question is not actual reliability of police database, it is reasonableness of reliance on it

“As soon as [the officer] accessed [the database from the police car], he saw an alert suggesting that Defendant was armed. Defendant argues that Davis could not be sure of the accuracy of this information, but that hardly matters. Reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Question is not actual reliability of police database, it is reasonableness of reliance on it