The court finds the stop without reasonable suspicion. It was allegedly justified by paper LPN that didn’t match the car as without reasonable suspicion because the tags weren’t run until after the stop. That and other factors don’t make reasonable suspicion. The body cam video supports this. Defendant’s alleged assault on the officers was not attenuated from the illegal stop under the Brown factors, all of which favor defendant. United States v. Price, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200692 (D.D.C. Nov. 3, 2022).
The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to supervised release revocations. United States v. Greenbaum, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200686 (D. Colo. Nov. 3, 2022).*
“[D]espite Dorsey’s contentions to the contrary, this case does not ‘rise and fall’ on the information provided by the confidential informants.” There was plenty of other information. United States v. Dorsey, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200840 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 3, 2022).*
Plaintiff shows questions for trial. He was held 30 minutes for a drug dog without reasonable suspicion. The officers claimed he looked impaired, but he had a disability that made him look that way, and they never did a FST. Klaver v. Hamilton Cty., 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 30642 (6th Cir. Nov. 3, 2022).*