Category Archives: Consent

KS: Geofence warrant valid under GFE

This geofence warrant was valid by the good faith exception. State v. Mitchell-Pennington, 2026 Kan. App. LEXIS 6 (Jan. 23, 2026). The omitted facts merely clarified, not defeated, probable cause. The motion to suppress was properly denied. Urrutia v. State, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Consent, Franks doctrine, geofence, Good faith exception | Comments Off on KS: Geofence warrant valid under GFE

CA7: Stop at night in a high crime area and furtive movements justified protective sweep of car

Defendant was stopped in a high crime area at night, and his furtive movements in the car justified a protective sweep of the car. United States v. Erving, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 1377 (7th Cir. Jan. 20, 2026).* Defendant’s car … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Stop at night in a high crime area and furtive movements justified protective sweep of car

FL: Request for consent after stop outside city jurisdiction was reasonable

A municipal police officer had authority to request consent after a stop outside his territorial jurisdiction. One justice concurring said that’s not a Fourth Amendment violation anyway, and suppression wouldn’t be an appropriate remedy. State v. Repple, 2025 Fla. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on FL: Request for consent after stop outside city jurisdiction was reasonable

WI: “the end of a romantic relationship does not automatically terminate shared authority when the partner continues to access or use the property”

“The fact that Klein expressed anger toward A.V. and moved some of her belongings outside does not establish that her residential status had ended. He did not finish removing her possessions, he permitted her inside, and her household items remained … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on WI: “the end of a romantic relationship does not automatically terminate shared authority when the partner continues to access or use the property”

D.D.C.: Arrest on a warrant where defendant fled justified search incident

Defendant had a warrant for his arrest. He was seen by police, and he fled. When he was tackled to the ground and handcuffed, the officers rolled him over finding a gun in his waistband. It was a valid search … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Arrest on a warrant where defendant fled justified search incident

CA8: Merely handling bag on a Greyhound Bus at a stop wasn’t a search or seizure

The officer’s handling defendant’s suitcase on a Greyhound Bus for five seconds to remove it from the bus, just as the driver or baggage handlers would, before asking him for consent was not unreasonable. Defendant validly consented to its search. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA8: Merely handling bag on a Greyhound Bus at a stop wasn’t a search or seizure

TX12: When passenger was ordered out of car and “couldn’t open” door, officer could

During a traffic stop, an object hanging inside the passenger door concerned the officer. The passenger claimed the door wouldn’t open from inside, so it was reasonable for the officer to open the door when ordering the passenger out. Penney … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Search | Comments Off on TX12: When passenger was ordered out of car and “couldn’t open” door, officer could

MI: PC for SW completely lacking, so no GFE

“As noted by dissenting Judge Garrett, the search-warrant affidavit failed to connect the firearms and firearm-related items listed in the search warrant with the suspected criminal activity. Therefore, there was not probable cause to believe ‘that contraband or evidence of … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on MI: PC for SW completely lacking, so no GFE

NC: Admin. tax warrant search of house violated 4A

Search under a general administrative tax warrant under state law violates the Fourth Amendment. This involved a search of a house where the taxes were not paid on illegal drugs. Also, it was issued by the Secretary of Revenue and … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Informant hearsay, Neutral and detached magistrate, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NC: Admin. tax warrant search of house violated 4A

N.D.Tex.: Merely being a federal contractor doesn’t make employer’s search state action

Being a federal contractor wasn’t enough to make defendant food service company a state actor. Ellis v. Ben E. Keith Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217957 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 1, 2025). Officers had a warrant for the place searched and … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Private search, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Merely being a federal contractor doesn’t make employer’s search state action

W.D.Ky.: No requirement cell phone search protocol be specified in the SW

There is no requirement in the Sixth Circuit for a cell phone search protocol to be specified in the search warrant. United States v. Lanham, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202782 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 14, 2025). There was probable cause defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: No requirement cell phone search protocol be specified in the SW

D.Minn.: Def’s lies supported finding of consent to search

Despite defendant having some cognitive difficulties, the court concludes his lies to the officer before consenting still supported consent. The ability to lie shows knowledge. United States v. Lumbert, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201199 (D. Minn. Aug. 13, 2025):

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def’s lies supported finding of consent to search

CT: No REP in DNA recovered from trash search that connected def to a 36-year-old cold case

Defendant became a suspect in 2020 for cold cases from 1984. A trash search produced a discarded belt that was DNA tested, seemingly matching him to the 1984 crimes. A confirmatory test was done by warrant. Defendant had no reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Protective sweep, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CT: No REP in DNA recovered from trash search that connected def to a 36-year-old cold case

S.D.N.Y.: Legal mail can be copied for inmate to guard against disguised legal mail

Prisons can copy legal mail in presence of the inmate to guard against contraband coming in disguised as legal mail. Prisoners’ Legal Servs. of N.Y. v. United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195443 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 5, … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Informant hearsay, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Legal mail can be copied for inmate to guard against disguised legal mail

HI: No REP in IP information

There is no Fourth Amendment protection in one’s subscriber information provided to a third-party internet service provider and its link to an IP address. State v. Brown, 2025 Haw. LEXIS 268 (Sep. 30, 2025).* The state contends defendant had no … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on HI: No REP in IP information

C.D.Cal.: Handcuffing an inmate is not a 4A violation

“Plaintiff’s only purported basis for a Fourth Amendment claim is a vague assertion that ‘handcuff/restraints = false report.’ (Compl. at 6). Liberally construed, this appears to suggest that Plaintiff allegedly was seized without sufficient cause. In the prison context, however, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Warrant papers | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Handcuffing an inmate is not a 4A violation

D.S.C.: Police and issuing magistrate having same address doesn’t make judge not neutral and detached

Just because the issuing magistrate and the police department share the same address does not prove that the magistrate was not neutral and detached. More is required. Lafoy v. O’Brien, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190411 (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2025). “Even … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Police and issuing magistrate having same address doesn’t make judge not neutral and detached

TX2: Asking for consent four times doesn’t make it coercive

The fact defendant was asked four times for consent doesn’t make it coercive. Arnold v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7228 (Tex. App. – Ft. Worth Sep. 11, 2025). Velez finally contends that no reasonable officer could have concluded that … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Scope of search, Voluntariness | Comments Off on TX2: Asking for consent four times doesn’t make it coercive

W.D.Wash.: Hiding a small pouch in another’s car was not abandonment; he retained a REP

Defendant’s hiding a small pouch in another person’s car was not abandonment. He otherwise manifested a reasonable expectation of privacy in it. United States v. Jensen, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170474 (W.D. Wash. Sep. 2, 2025). Defendant’s encounter with the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Hiding a small pouch in another’s car was not abandonment; he retained a REP

E.D.Cal.: Excessive prison strip search sufficiently alleged

Prison strip search: “Here, liberally construed, it appears plaintiff may be able to state a Fourth Amendment claim against the defendants who stripped plaintiff naked where it is alleged that plaintiff was brought to the ASU from the program office … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Excessive prison strip search sufficiently alleged