W.D.Wash.: Hiding a small pouch in another’s car was not abandonment; he retained a REP

Defendant’s hiding a small pouch in another person’s car was not abandonment. He otherwise manifested a reasonable expectation of privacy in it. United States v. Jensen, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170474 (W.D. Wash. Sep. 2, 2025).

Defendant’s encounter with the officer here after one with mall security was consensual. United States v. Dessasure, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168056 (S.D. Ga. July 7, 2025),* adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167009 (S.D. Ga. Aug. 26, 2025).*

There was probable cause for defendant’s stop, contrary to his claim. State v. Cabiness, 2025-Ohio-3087 (5th Dist. Aug. 28, 2025).*

Petitioner’s claim he was entitled to a Franks hearing with newly discovered evidence fails because the part he’s contesting doesn’t matter to the probable cause determination. Rodgers v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168000 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.