Author Archives: Hall

D.Minn.: Disavowing ownership of the thing seized means no standing

“Here, Jackson appears to have denied any possessory interest in the SUV and the backpack. (Dkt. 22 ¶ 7 (‘Jackson was not the registered owner of the vehicle. He further claims all of the items in the vehicle and the … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Disavowing ownership of the thing seized means no standing

M.D.Ga.: Riverside/Gerstein violation doesn’t justify suppression of evidence seized on arrest

A Riverside/Gerstein violation of not timely presenting probable cause to a magistrate doesn’t justify suppressing the evidence from the arrest. United States v. Jackson, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234511 (M.D. Ga. Dec. 31, 2024):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Search incident | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: Riverside/Gerstein violation doesn’t justify suppression of evidence seized on arrest

Motor Biscuit: Police hope you don’t know the “K9 unit” loophole used to search your car illegally

Motor Biscuit: Police hope you don’t know the “K9 unit” loophole used to search your car illegally by Henry Cesar (“Imagine getting pulled over for a broken taillight. The cop checks your license, hands you a ticket, and starts to … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on Motor Biscuit: Police hope you don’t know the “K9 unit” loophole used to search your car illegally

N.D.Okla.: Flashing a fake badge in public doesn’t support SW for house

Defendant was indicted for impersonating an officer and flashing a fake badge at a school pickup line. The search warrant for his house for more evidence of that is suppressed. No nexus is ever shown between that offense and his … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Flashing a fake badge in public doesn’t support SW for house

W.D.N.Y.: Incorrect AUSA assertion about which phone was searched had to be promptly clarified, not when he or she felt like it

Here, the AUSA was apparently confused in pleadings as to which cell phone was searched, a white or black one. When the AUSA learned that the wrong one was spoken of, he or she had a duty to promptly clarify–not … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Incorrect AUSA assertion about which phone was searched had to be promptly clarified, not when he or she felt like it

E.D.Mo.: Even though threatened with obstruction if he didn’t, defendant consented to seizure of cell phone

The officer had probable cause to believe defendant took a video of a young girl in his house in the bathtub. Defendant was persuaded to turn over the phone and it was consensual. He was told that he might be … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Voluntariness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Even though threatened with obstruction if he didn’t, defendant consented to seizure of cell phone

E.D.Ky.: § 1983 complaint against his state case is barred by Younger

Plaintiff’s § 1983 complaint against his state case is barred by Younger. Cuffee v. Cabuay, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 233153 (E.D. Ky. Dec. 27, 2024).* Defendant has no standing to challenge the search of another person’s cell phone. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: § 1983 complaint against his state case is barred by Younger

DE: After the first SW was overbroad, officers got a second narrower warrant which had an independent source from the first

When the search warrant was found overbroad, a second warrant was issued based on the same information that was far narrower. It was valid because of its independent source. The alleged false statement in the DNA warrant wasn’t. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Private search, Probable cause | Comments Off on DE: After the first SW was overbroad, officers got a second narrower warrant which had an independent source from the first

OR: 3 am look at def’s car in driveway was unreasonable under state constitution

Officers approached defendant’s house by the driveway and came to the “back door” which was also a way into the house for ordinary visitors. The look at his car at 3 am exceeded implied consent to enter. “[A]t three o’clock … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Qualified immunity, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: 3 am look at def’s car in driveway was unreasonable under state constitution

NY Monroe Co.: The constitution doesn’t apply to citizen’s arrest

In a citizen’s arrest, if the citizen, not a law enforcement officer, violates the constitution or statute, the arrest will not be suppressed for that reason alone. His statement to an officer captured on video will not be suppressed because … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Private search, Scope of search | Comments Off on NY Monroe Co.: The constitution doesn’t apply to citizen’s arrest

N.D.Ala.: A keycard found on def in a search incident for something else not suppressed

A keycard on defendant was properly seized incident to arrest. It wasn’t evidence of the crime of the arrest, but it was of another crime. United States v. Croom, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231419 (N.D. Ala. Dec. 2, 2024), adopted … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: A keycard found on def in a search incident for something else not suppressed

The Guardian: Kentucky police fatally shoot man while serving warrant at wrong home

The Guardian: Kentucky police fatally shoot man while serving warrant at wrong home by Emily Swanson (“Police in Kentucky recently shot a man to death in his home while they executed a search warrant that appears to have been intended … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on The Guardian: Kentucky police fatally shoot man while serving warrant at wrong home

CA5: Where 4A claim undecided below, it doesn’t form basis for stay

In the appeal of Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland, posted here, the Fifth Circuit doesn’t rely on the undecided Fourth Amendment claim in deciding on a stay. 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 32565 (5th Cir. Dec. 23, 2024).* The … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Where 4A claim undecided below, it doesn’t form basis for stay

TN: SW didn’t say blood to be taken and seized could be tested, but it could be under common sense reading

“Although the warrant did not specifically state that the blood was to be ‘tested,’ ‘analyzed,’ or ‘examined’ for such intoxicants, a logical, commonsense reading of the warrant shows that the warrant was meant to authorize such analysis because an intoxicating … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TN: SW didn’t say blood to be taken and seized could be tested, but it could be under common sense reading

CA5: Ptf’s excessive force claim arising from a traffic stop expands Bivens

Plaintiff’s shooting during a traffic stop gone bad is an expansion of Bivens and is rejected. Hernandez v. Causey, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 32527 (5th Cir. Dec. 23, 2024). Defendant had standing to contest the search of his room at … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Excessive force, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf’s excessive force claim arising from a traffic stop expands Bivens

IA: Rental inspection ordinance not facially unconstitutional; administrative warrants required

The city’s rental property inspection ordinance does not fail under the state constitution’s search and seizure clause because it is not facially void in all circumstances. Administrative warrants can be obtained when there’s a proper showing. Singer v. City of … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Admissibility of evidence, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on IA: Rental inspection ordinance not facially unconstitutional; administrative warrants required

MN: Dog sniff inside car a search

A dog sniff inside a car is a search. But here it was with probable cause. State v. Johnson, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 537 (Dec. 23, 2024):

Posted in Dog sniff, Search | Comments Off on MN: Dog sniff inside car a search

LATimes: ‘Ghost stops’: Lieutenant claims LAPD officials were warned about troubled gang unit

LATimes: ‘Ghost stops’: Lieutenant claims LAPD officials were warned about troubled gang unit by Libor Jany (claim of retaliation for reporting on police stops where body cams were turned off or no reports ever made).

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on LATimes: ‘Ghost stops’: Lieutenant claims LAPD officials were warned about troubled gang unit

IN: Facebook SW production authenticated records for trial

The search warrant production helped authenticate defendant’s Facebook records for trial. Anderson v. State, 2024 Ind. App. LEXIS 351 (Dec. 20, 2024). The fog line statute requires a driver to stay “as nearly as practicable entirely within a single lane” … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Facebook SW production authenticated records for trial

IA: Federal supervised release search standards apply when leading to state prosecution

Conflict of laws: Where defendant’s supervised release search was by federal officers, federal law controls in state court, not state law. State v. Young, 2024 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 106 (Dec. 20, 2024). A motion to reconsider denial of a Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Conflict of laws, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on IA: Federal supervised release search standards apply when leading to state prosecution