N.D.Ala.: A keycard found on def in a search incident for something else not suppressed

A keycard on defendant was properly seized incident to arrest. It wasn’t evidence of the crime of the arrest, but it was of another crime. United States v. Croom, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231419 (N.D. Ala. Dec. 2, 2024), adopted 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230733 (N.D. Ala. Dec. 20, 2024).

Plaintiff’s claim of future potential code violation searches is speculative. The fact the city didn’t accede to his proposed alternatives doesn’t show First Amendment retaliation. McKamey v. Skrmetti, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231785 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 23, 2024).*

The USMJ found no probable cause but did find good faith. The USDJ on review finds probable cause for the brief affidavit for warrant. United States v. Lineback, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230748 (W.D. Tenn. Dec. 20, 2024).*

Plaintiff has a § 1983 case pending over taking his children from the home. A separate habeas case doesn’t lie. Harrison v. Ala. Dep’t of Hum. Res., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231943 (M.D. Ala. Dec. 23, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Search incident. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.