Author Archives: Hall

D.P.R.: Officers’ reliance on differing versions of weapons law was objectively reasonable

The Spanish and English versions of a section of the Puerto Rico Weapons Law differ with “and” and “or” and reliance on whichever is objectively reasonable under Heien. United States v. Rosa-Ufred, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49334 (D.P.R. Mar. 14, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Officers’ reliance on differing versions of weapons law was objectively reasonable

CA10: Siccing police dog on sleeping man wasn’t subject to QI

Siccing a police dog on a sleeping man not subject to qualified immunity. Luethje v. Kyle, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6385 (10th Cir. Mar. 19, 2025). The CI’s information on a video showed his basis of knowledge and provided probable … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: Siccing police dog on sleeping man wasn’t subject to QI

N.D.Ind.: There was PC for stop, and pretext claim was speculative and didn’t merit hearing

Defendant’s claim that the officer was acting pretextually in stopping him is speculative at best. “Mr. Ellis also argues that the traffic stop was pretextual. However, an officer’s ‘actual motivations’ and ‘[s]ubjective intentions play no role in ordinary, probable-cause Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: There was PC for stop, and pretext claim was speculative and didn’t merit hearing

N.D.Miss.: Summers didn’t support transporting person to jail whose house was being searched

Plaintiff’s house was searched on a warrant. There was no probable cause as to him at the time. It was unreasonable under Summers to transport him in handcuffs to the jail to be questioned for five hours and then released. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: Summers didn’t support transporting person to jail whose house was being searched

E.D.Mich.: Ptf’s jail strip search on camera after contact visit was reasonable

Plaintiff’s jail strip search after a contact visit was reasonable, and the fact it was on camera doesn’t make it unreasonable. Parker v. Robert J. White Mich. Dep’t of Corr., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48519 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 27, 2025):

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Ptf’s jail strip search on camera after contact visit was reasonable

CA9: No QI for nearly destroying a house in a search for a person to arrest

Summary judgment and qualified immunity were properly denied where officers searching for someone other than the plaintiff in plaintiff’s house [apparently] gratuitously nearly destroyed it, breaking all windows, toilets, leaving water running in the house, appliances, furniture, and a car … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: No QI for nearly destroying a house in a search for a person to arrest

ARS Technica: Everything you say to your Echo will be sent to Amazon starting on March 28

ARS Technica: Everything you say to your Echo will be sent to Amazon starting on March 28 by Scharon Harding:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on ARS Technica: Everything you say to your Echo will be sent to Amazon starting on March 28

D.Minn.: SW’s failure to include motel name, address, and room number failed particularity

The search warrant was ostensibly for a particular Motel 6 and room number, but the warrant completely omitted reference to the place to be searched. United States v. Brown, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47675 (D. Minn. Mar. 13, 2025). When … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: SW’s failure to include motel name, address, and room number failed particularity

PA: For crime of obstructing a search, def didn’t have to see SW to know there was one when he was told

Defendant’s conviction for obstructing a search is affirmed. He was not entitled to a jury instruction that he had to have seen or read the warrant first where it was not disputed that he knew there was a warrant. Commonwealth … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on PA: For crime of obstructing a search, def didn’t have to see SW to know there was one when he was told

CA7: No QI for 2015 detention of 16 year old without justification

Officers are denied qualified immunity winning at trial for his false detention four days before Christmas nearly a decade ago. The law was clearly established plaintiff couldn’t be detained like this for no apparent reason. Taylor v. Schwarzhuber, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: No QI for 2015 detention of 16 year old without justification

CA9: Failure to tell def of precise reason for arrest when no warrant in hand did not warrant suppression

Suppression of defendant’s statements is not warranted for FBI agents’ violation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 4(c)(3)(A), which provides that an arresting officer who does not possess a copy of the arrest warrant “must inform the defendant of the warrant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Exclusionary rule, Foreign searches, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Failure to tell def of precise reason for arrest when no warrant in hand did not warrant suppression

The Intercept: DEA Insiders Warned About Legality of Phone Tracking Program. Their Concerns Were Kept Secret.

The Intercept: DEA Insiders Warned About Legality of Phone Tracking Program. Their Concerns Were Kept Secret. (“The DEA ignored the internal alarm about its Hemisphere mass phone data collection program, according to newly revealed details in a government report.”) It … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Intercept: DEA Insiders Warned About Legality of Phone Tracking Program. Their Concerns Were Kept Secret.

Reason: Taking $200 Out of an ATM Should Not Trigger Federal Financial Surveillance: No, not even if you do it in a county that borders Mexico.

Reason: Taking $200 Out of an ATM Should Not Trigger Federal Financial Surveillance: No, not even if you do it in a county that borders Mexico. by Joe Lancaster (“One of President Donald Trump’s Day 1 executive orders designated ‘certain … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Reason: Taking $200 Out of an ATM Should Not Trigger Federal Financial Surveillance: No, not even if you do it in a county that borders Mexico.

D.D.C.: BLM 1A speech restriction claim can proceed as a class action

A class claim for the June 2020 Lafayette Square BLM protest is certified for the First Amendment speech restriction claims but not the retaliation claims because they do not satisfy commonality under Rule 23(a). Damages claims can be pursued separately. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Nexus | Comments Off on D.D.C.: BLM 1A speech restriction claim can proceed as a class action

Sophie Z. Lee, The Reconciliation Roots of Fourth Amendment Privacy

Sophie Z. Lee, The Reconciliation Roots of Fourth Amendment Privacy, 91 U. Chi. L. Rev. 2139 (2024):

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Sophie Z. Lee, The Reconciliation Roots of Fourth Amendment Privacy

CA6: Mandamus doesn’t lie to force grant of a motion to suppress

Mandamus doesn’t lie to compel a district court to grant a motion to suppress and dismiss an indictment because of an alleged change in the dates of the charge to cover up an illegal search. There’s a possible remedy in … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA6: Mandamus doesn’t lie to force grant of a motion to suppress

CA3: Apartment visitor to conduct drug deal has no standing

An apartment visitor to conduct a drug deal has no standing to contest a search that happened while he was there. United States v. Loyal, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 5853 (3d Cir. Mar. 13, 2025). By collective knowledge, there was … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Pretext, Standards of review, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: Apartment visitor to conduct drug deal has no standing

VI: Wife had apparent authority to consent to search for firearm in bedroom, even if they didn’t share it

Defendant’s wife had apparent common authority to consent to a police entry while defendant slept. She led police into the home and directed them to the handgun in defendant’s bedroom closet. This satisfied co-occupant consent. They lived together, she knew … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Privileges | Comments Off on VI: Wife had apparent authority to consent to search for firearm in bedroom, even if they didn’t share it

GA: SW for air bag module and vehicle black box issued with PC and was particular

This search warrant for the Airbag Control Modules and the vehicle’s black box was issued on probable cause and was particular in a vehicular homicide case. Hutchins v. State, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 134 (Mar. 13, 2025):

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on GA: SW for air bag module and vehicle black box issued with PC and was particular

W.D.N.Y.: Just saying the Stone bar is “misplaced” isn’t an answer

“In his reply …, Petitioner asserts in conclusory fashion that Respondent’s application of Stone is ‘misplaced.’ … However, he fails to explain why this is so. Nor does he attempt to show that he did not have a ‘full and … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Just saying the Stone bar is “misplaced” isn’t an answer