Author Archives: Hall

VA: Fear of suicide attempt objectively justified warrantless entry as facts developed

Officers had an objectively reasonable basis for an entry and sweep under the emergency aid exception. Defendant was reportedly suicidal, wasn’t communicating at first, and then strange sounds were coming from where he was. “Based on these troubling circumstances, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Seizure | Comments Off on VA: Fear of suicide attempt objectively justified warrantless entry as facts developed

LawOfficer.com: What if police were ordered to search homes in violation of the Fourth Amendment?

LawOfficer.com: What if police were ordered to search homes in violation of the Fourth Amendment? by Jim McNeff:

Posted in Police misconduct | Comments Off on LawOfficer.com: What if police were ordered to search homes in violation of the Fourth Amendment?

CA7: Even though the 4A was complied with, if the question is relevance or prejudice, a motion in limine is proper, not a motion to suppress

Just because the Fourth Amendment was complied with doesn’t mean that the evidence seized is relevant (Rule 401) or the evidence could be more prejudicial than relevant (Rule 403). Then, suppression isn’t the remedy – a motion in limine is. … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Arrest or entry on arrest, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA7: Even though the 4A was complied with, if the question is relevance or prejudice, a motion in limine is proper, not a motion to suppress

E.D.Ky.: No discovery on ID of CI; not material to any 4A issue

Defendant was subjected to controlled buys with a CI that led to his search warrant. The officers involved can testify to what happened, and defendant hasn’t shown necessity for disclosure of the informant. “Additionally, to the extent that some information … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: No discovery on ID of CI; not material to any 4A issue

MA: DNA swab taken by consent during arrest without PC is suppressed, but state can do it over on remand

Defendant was arrested for murder, handcuffed and taken in for interrogation, all without probable cause. His statement was suppressed, and the state fails to show that obtaining his buccal swab during this time would clear even the low bar for … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA | Comments Off on MA: DNA swab taken by consent during arrest without PC is suppressed, but state can do it over on remand

MI Const. search and seizure provision is not coextensive with 4A

The Michigan Supreme Court sets aside part of a Court of Appeals decision that says that the Michigan Constitution’s search and seizure provision is coextensive with the Fourth Amendment because it’s not. Otherwise, it declines review of the decision. People … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, State constitution | Comments Off on MI Const. search and seizure provision is not coextensive with 4A

D.P.R.: Def driver had to somehow independently show ownership or control of vehicle for standing under CA1 precedent

When the vehicle stopped isn’t owned by the driver, he has to come forward with something showing standing. “However, Mr. Hernández-Marín failed to bring testimony other than himself to prove possession, control or ownership of the Dodge RAM pick-up truck … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Def driver had to somehow independently show ownership or control of vehicle for standing under CA1 precedent

NE: Def’s purse could be searched under automobile exception even though it had already been removed from car

Defendant’s purse was validly searched under the automobile exception after the backup officer smelled marijuana coming from the car. It didn’t matter that it wasn’t in the car at the time of the search. State v. Lang, 305 Neb. 726 … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on NE: Def’s purse could be searched under automobile exception even though it had already been removed from car

NYT: How Reuters Analyzed Court Data on Qualified Immunity

NYT: How Reuters Analyzed Court Data on Qualified Immunity (“Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has repeatedly criticized her fellow justices for creating, as she put it in a 2018 dissent, an ‘absolute shield’ for police officers accused of excessive force. … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NYT: How Reuters Analyzed Court Data on Qualified Immunity

FL5: Trial court’s order suppressing warrantless black box search affirmed for lack of a record

The trial court granted a motion to suppress the search of defendant’s car’s black box (“event data recorder”). The state on appeal seeks to depart from State v. Worsham, 227 So. 3d 602, 603 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017), that there … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Standards of review, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on FL5: Trial court’s order suppressing warrantless black box search affirmed for lack of a record

LA: No PC for warrantless entry and security cameras are not exigency

“Here, the trial court made credibility determinations based on the testimony of multiple officers involved in defendant’s arrest and found that officers lacked probable cause to search defendant’s residence. Furthermore, observation that defendant’s home had security cameras failed to amount … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on LA: No PC for warrantless entry and security cameras are not exigency

CA11: Possible ruse mentioned by officer came after consent already granted

Any ruse to get consent to search defendant’s bags after TSA was done with them came after consent was given and wasn’t considered. United States v. Benjamin, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 14755 (11th Cir. May 8, 2020). Defendant was lawfully … Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on CA11: Possible ruse mentioned by officer came after consent already granted

OH6: Deliberate stall of traffic stop for drug dog was unreasonable

There was no reasonable suspicion to continue the stop in this case. The officer called for backup and a dog, and the first officer there told him to stall for the dog. Nothing was done for eight minutes to pursue … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH6: Deliberate stall of traffic stop for drug dog was unreasonable

CA3: Byrd who won in SCOTUS on standing loses on remand because there was PC for the search

On remand from Byrd v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 1518 (2018), holding that defendant had standing in his rental car, defendant loses on the merits because there was probable cause for the search of his car because of the admission … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, SCOTUS, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: Byrd who won in SCOTUS on standing loses on remand because there was PC for the search

OH5: Driver’s pulling MJ from her bra wasn’t RS as to the passenger

The driver producing marijuana from her bra did not create reasonable suspicion as to passenger. State v. Howard, 2020-Ohio-1400, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 1364 (5th Dist. Apr. 7, 2020). Since the three search warrants were all issued with probable cause, … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: Driver’s pulling MJ from her bra wasn’t RS as to the passenger

Chattanooga Times Free Press: State health department gives names, addresses of Tennesseans with COVID-19 to law enforcement

Chattanooga Times Free Press: State health department gives names, addresses of Tennesseans with COVID-19 to law enforcement by Anita Wadhwani (“The Tennessee Department of Health is providing the names and addresses of residents who test positive for COVID-19 to sheriffs … Continue reading →

Posted in Informational privacy, Privileges | Comments Off on Chattanooga Times Free Press: State health department gives names, addresses of Tennesseans with COVID-19 to law enforcement

E.D.Pa.: Holding def’s computer for 6 hrs to get SW after he revoked consent was reasonable

Defendant at first consented to the government holding and then searching his cell phone and laptop. The next day he revoked his consent on the computer. The government continued to hold the laptop to preserve evidence and got a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Inventory, Reasonableness, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Holding def’s computer for 6 hrs to get SW after he revoked consent was reasonable

D.N.M.: Violated no REP to open driver door to read VIN where dashboard number obscured

It was reasonable to open a car door to read the VIN on the doorjamb under New York v. Class because the officer couldn’t see the one on the dashboard because of the glare of the sun. Otherwise, there was … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Violated no REP to open driver door to read VIN where dashboard number obscured

S.D.Miss.: Motion to suppress having been granted, def is a candidate for pretrial release

With the evidence against defendant suppressed, the government’s case is weakened, and defendant is a candidate for pretrial release. United States v. Norbert, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61799 (S.D. Miss. Apr. 8, 2020). The trial court’s order allowing defendant’s motion … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Motion to suppress having been granted, def is a candidate for pretrial release

NY3: Even if CSLI was wrongly obtained, it was harmless error

Assuming, without deciding, that obtaining defendant’s CSLI in a knife attack case was unreasonable, it was harmless error on this record. Plenty of other evidence connected him. People v. Perez, 2020 NY Slip Op 02684, 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on NY3: Even if CSLI was wrongly obtained, it was harmless error