Author Archives: Hall

WI: Impoundment of car because def was merely ticketed for not having a valid license was unreasonable

Defendant was stopped for speeding, and he was found without a license. The police didn’t arrest him, just ticketed him. Impounding his car and inventorying it was unreasonable under the circumstances, and this was not a reasonable exercise of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Inventory | Comments Off on WI: Impoundment of car because def was merely ticketed for not having a valid license was unreasonable

CA2: Second Tasing of nonresisting detainee was unreasonable

On this record, the second Tasing of plaintiff could be found unreasonable for lack of resistance, which the jury did. Jones v. Treubig, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 19883 (2d Cir. June 26, 2020). The search under defendant’s consent for “firearms/evidence” … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Overseizure, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA2: Second Tasing of nonresisting detainee was unreasonable

CA9: Not precisely following CHP inventory policy doesn’t make it unreasonable

Not precisely following CHP policy in filing out the inventory papers didn’t per se make the inventory search unreasonable. United States v. Magdirila, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 19477 (9th Cir. June 23, 2020). The community caretaking function of police permitted … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Inventory | Comments Off on CA9: Not precisely following CHP inventory policy doesn’t make it unreasonable

S.D.Ohio: Collective knowledge applies to traffic stops

The collective knowledge doctrine applies to traffic stops. United States v. Murray, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111040 (S.D. Ohio June 24, 2020). “Applying this [deferential] standard of review to the warrant application, the Court has reviewed the application and finds … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Collective knowledge applies to traffic stops

MA: No right to counsel at execution of SW

“The defendant has presented no case law supporting his proposition that the target of a search warrant has a right to have counsel present during the execution of a warrant. The officers executed a warrant to search the defendant’s cell … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on MA: No right to counsel at execution of SW

E.D.Ky.: Objection to USMJ’s findings must specifically challenge 4A rationale

“Defendant’s objections do not address the Magistrate’s analysis or conclusions regarding Grounds 11 and 15. Instead, Defendant vaguely asserts that his counsel should have challenged the ‘validity of [the] evidence[.]’ (DE 406 at 7.) Defendant provides no basis to challenge … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Objection to USMJ’s findings must specifically challenge 4A rationale

NY1: Seizure for forfeiture fails for lack of notice to owner

The city failed in its burden of proof for seizure for forfeiture that the owner was aware. Matter of Smith v. City of New York, 2020 NY Slip Op 03600, 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3687 (1st Dept. June 25, … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on NY1: Seizure for forfeiture fails for lack of notice to owner

AZ: Challenging neutral and detached magistrate requires showing “systemic or patent partiality”

“In the appeal, Macias argued against the application of the good-faith exception, claiming that the magistrate’s conduct showed he had abandoned impartiality or was unable to act in a neutral and detached manner. … However, to warrant exclusion of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on AZ: Challenging neutral and detached magistrate requires showing “systemic or patent partiality”

WI: Incapacitated driver provision unconstitutional re implied consent; but GFE applies here

“We conclude that the incapacitated driver provision is unconstitutional because the implied consent that incapacitated drivers are deemed to have given and presumed not to have withdrawn does not satisfy any exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. However, we … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on WI: Incapacitated driver provision unconstitutional re implied consent; but GFE applies here

Cal.1: Despite the pandemic, arrestees are entitled to a prompt judicial determination of PC

Despite the pandemic and court closures, arrestees are entitled to a prompt judicial determination of probable cause under Gerstein. Bullock v. Superior Court, 2020 Cal. App. LEXIS 575 (1st Dist. June 24, 2020). During a search of defendant’s house under … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.1: Despite the pandemic, arrestees are entitled to a prompt judicial determination of PC

D.Minn.: Collective knowledge doctrine doesn’t require affiant officer to independently corroborate

The affidavit for the search warrant here was adequate to show nexus and probable cause for a search. The reliance on other officers’ information didn’t require this officer to independently corroborate it. United States v. Velazquez, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Collective knowledge doctrine doesn’t require affiant officer to independently corroborate

IL: Arguing only lack of arrest warrant waives lack of PC

Pleading and litigating a motion to suppress in the trial court that the officers lacked an arrest warrant or an exception waived his appellate claim of a lack of probable cause. People v. Montes, 2020 IL App (2d) 180565, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on IL: Arguing only lack of arrest warrant waives lack of PC

AP: Michigan voters to decide on data protections in November election

AP: Michigan voters to decide on data protections in November election (“A state constitutional amendment to designate electronic communication and data as personal property has made it onto the November ballot. If passed, the amendment would put the same protections … Continue reading →

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on AP: Michigan voters to decide on data protections in November election

CA5: Expert opinion on reasonableness in 1983 case improper

“We first find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding portions of testimony from two of Albert’s expert witnesses—Richard Lichten, a police-procedure expert, and Dr. Kris Sperry, the former Chief Medical Examiner for the State of … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on CA5: Expert opinion on reasonableness in 1983 case improper

HI: Knock-and-announce for 25 seconds at 6:15 am before forced entry unreasonable

Under the state constitution, police knocks on the door for 25 seconds in the early morning before forcibly entering after even hearing the homeowner call out was not a reasonable amount of time to respond, and this warranted suppression of … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on HI: Knock-and-announce for 25 seconds at 6:15 am before forced entry unreasonable

D.Minn.: Is changing cell phone settings before SW issued a search? SW moots that issue

The court does not have to decide whether changing the settings on defendant’s cell phone prior to obtaining a search warrant for it was a search. The later issuance of a search warrant for the phone moots that point because … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Is changing cell phone settings before SW issued a search? SW moots that issue

NPR: WBUR: Boston Bans Use Of Facial Recognition Technology.

NPR: WBUR: Boston Bans Use Of Facial Recognition Technology. It’s The 2nd-Largest City To Do So (“Boston has banned the use of facial surveillance technology in the city, becoming the second-largest community in the world to do so.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NPR: WBUR: Boston Bans Use Of Facial Recognition Technology.

OH10: When def subjected to two SWs, only arguing first waives second

Where defendant was subjected to two search warrants and he only argued the first to the trial court, the second was waived for appeal. State v. Wilkins, 2020-Ohio-3428, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 2359 (10th Dist. June 23, 2020). “A finding … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on OH10: When def subjected to two SWs, only arguing first waives second

CA8: Def didn’t show standing in rental car with blank rental agreement

Defendant’s possession of a blank rental agreement fell short of showing his standing to challenge the search of the car he was driving. Defendant has to go forward on standing somehow, and Byrd doesn’t say how. United States v. White, … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Def didn’t show standing in rental car with blank rental agreement

NY2: Arrest for burglary justifies SI of backpack

Defendant’s arrest for burglary, a violent crime, and his uncooperativeness justified a search incident of his backpack for possible weapons. People v. Mabry, 2020 NY Slip Op 03540, 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3583 (2d Dept. June 24, 2020). There … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Search incident | Comments Off on NY2: Arrest for burglary justifies SI of backpack