Author Archives: Hall

CA9: Excessive force claims don’t require damages

Plaintiff showed a prima facie case of excessive force in violation of clearly established law, even without damages, to go forward. Cortesluna v. Leon, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 33792 (9th Cir. Oct. 27, 2020):

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA9: Excessive force claims don’t require damages

Chicago Sun Times: Does Illinois’ pot law pass the smell test? Scent of weed can still prompt cops to search vehicles

Chicago Sun Times: Does Illinois’ pot law pass the smell test? Scent of weed can still prompt cops to search vehicles By Tom Schuba (“For many folks, the fragrance of weed is unmistakable. But the mere smell of pot can … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on Chicago Sun Times: Does Illinois’ pot law pass the smell test? Scent of weed can still prompt cops to search vehicles

E.D.Ky.: Vehicle stop based on the state’s Automated Vehicle Information System was reasonable

A vehicle stop based on the state’s Automated Vehicle Information System was justifiable and reasonable. United States v. Lawson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198220 (E.D. Ky. Oct. 1, 2020). Plaintiff has the ability to litigate the search issues in state … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstention, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Vehicle stop based on the state’s Automated Vehicle Information System was reasonable

CA5: GFE question is reasonableness of executing officer’s belief in PC

The district court erred in finding that the search warrant here was bare bones and that the good faith exception did not apply. There was a factual basis from which a reasonable officer would conclude there was probable cause. “But, … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Good faith exception, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA5: GFE question is reasonableness of executing officer’s belief in PC

CA6: PO’s seizure of cell phone for search lacked RS and is suppressed

The probation seizure and then warranted search of defendant’s cell phone was unreasonable and conducted without reasonable suspicion. Probation seized the phone and then got a search warrant for it, but it all lacked justification. There wasn’t reasonable suspicion because … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: PO’s seizure of cell phone for search lacked RS and is suppressed

ABA CJS: The Privacy Implications of DUI Refusals and Forced Blood Alcohol Tests: What Judges Can Do

ABA CJS: The Privacy Implications of DUI Refusals and Forced Blood Alcohol Tests: What Judges Can Do by Hon. Zuberi Bakari Williams (“Usually, a refusal to take an alcohol breath test ends the collection of evidence of alcohol for routine … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on ABA CJS: The Privacy Implications of DUI Refusals and Forced Blood Alcohol Tests: What Judges Can Do

CA5: Examination of addresses on package was reasonable and led to RS

There was reasonable suspicion for detaining this package based on the lack of veracity of the delivery and return addresses. Examination of the package in the mail sorting system was not a search or seizure. United States v. Jones, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA5: Examination of addresses on package was reasonable and led to RS

KS: Looking in purse of unconscious driver was reasonable

The emergency aid exception applied: “Officer Brown searched Smith’s purse seeking Smith’s identity and any information that would explain the nature of Smith’s condition and the best means of treating it. When the officer made this decision, the paramedics were … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Border search, Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on KS: Looking in purse of unconscious driver was reasonable

D.S.D.: Seizure of work product from def’s jail cell for witness tampering was reasonable and run through a taint team

The search of defendant’s jail cell for evidence of witness tampering in his “work product” was reasonable, and the government used a taint team to segregate it. “The government’s conduct in this case was neither ill-conceived nor outrageous. It must … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Seizure of work product from def’s jail cell for witness tampering was reasonable and run through a taint team

PA: CSLI warrant was particular with phone number and time, without name of owner

CSLI warrant was particular when it described the phone number and time period and didn’t have to name the phone owner. Commonwealth v. Davis, 2020 Pa. Super. LEXIS 885 (Oct. 23, 2020). The officer spent a week corroborating the CI, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on PA: CSLI warrant was particular with phone number and time, without name of owner

D.S.D.: Failure to bring affidavit for SW to scene of search doesn’t obviate GFE

The affidavit for this search warrant was based on probable cause. “Law enforcement’s failure to bring the affidavit in support of the search warrant to the scene of the search is not fatal to the good-faith exception’s application. … The … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Failure to bring affidavit for SW to scene of search doesn’t obviate GFE

WaPo: Senators seek IG probe of border agency’s warrantless use of phone location data

WaPo: Senators seek IG probe of border agency’s warrantless use of phone location data by Drew Harswell (“In August, Customs and Border Protection subscribed to a service that reports the location of cellphones to businesses.”)

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on WaPo: Senators seek IG probe of border agency’s warrantless use of phone location data

GA: Search incident to arrest without PC is suppressed

The trial court did not apply the beyond a reasonable doubt standard to the search, contrary to the state’s argument. It did apply the preponderance standard, and the record supports its finding that the state failed to show probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell site location information, Search incident | Comments Off on GA: Search incident to arrest without PC is suppressed

CA10: QI denied over mistakenly obtained arrest warrant

A bunch of arrest warrant affidavits were executed in a drug sweep. Plaintiff’s, however, was seriously mistaken, and he was arrested. The district court’s qualified immunity summary judgment for him is reversed. Bickford v. Hensley, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 33400 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: QI denied over mistakenly obtained arrest warrant

IN: Def didn’t show standing in an apartment where his pants were

Defendant failed to show standing in an apartment he had a pair of jeans in where the officer stepped on them during a walk through and felt drugs underfoot. The police responded to a domestic call, and found defendant outside … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on IN: Def didn’t show standing in an apartment where his pants were

VA: Automatic license plate reader information does not form an “information system”; injunction dissolved

Injunction against local police use of license plate readers vacated. “We agree with the Police Department that the ALPR system does not constitute an ‘information system’ within the intendment of the Data Act and we, therefore, reverse the decision below.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Informational privacy | Comments Off on VA: Automatic license plate reader information does not form an “information system”; injunction dissolved

OR: Def’s consent and statements are suppressed, but the search with a warrant is not

While defendant’s consent to search and statements made were invalid, the search was pursuant to a valid warrant, and the product of the search is not suppressed. State v. Joaquin, 307 Ore. App. 314, 2020 Ore. App. LEXIS 1243 (Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Def’s consent and statements are suppressed, but the search with a warrant is not

D.Mont.: Warrantless taking of penile swabs from def in custody lacked exigency

Warrantless collection of penile swabs from defendant in custody lacked exigent circumstances and was suppressed. United States v. Birdsbill, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196612 (D. Mont. Oct. 20, 2020):

Posted in Body searches, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Warrantless taking of penile swabs from def in custody lacked exigency

OH8: Denial of cross-examination over affidavit for SW was harmless here

Officer’s statement in affidavit was assumed to be subject to cross-examination for impeachment purposes, but it was harmless error here. State v. Butts, 2020-Ohio-5011, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 3843 (8th Dist. Oct. 22, 2020).* [Note: a new § 60.57 on … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH8: Denial of cross-examination over affidavit for SW was harmless here

CA6: Parole “stalking horse” rationale likely no longer good law; question is whether state parole law allowed the search

The probation and parole search “stalking horse” rationale probably is no longer good law. Defendant here was a person of interest in a homicide, and the police got his parole officer to conduct a search which was valid under state … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA6: Parole “stalking horse” rationale likely no longer good law; question is whether state parole law allowed the search