OR: Def’s consent and statements are suppressed, but the search with a warrant is not

While defendant’s consent to search and statements made were invalid, the search was pursuant to a valid warrant, and the product of the search is not suppressed. State v. Joaquin, 307 Ore. App. 314, 2020 Ore. App. LEXIS 1243 (Oct. 21, 2020).*

Officers diligently pursued their investigation of the stop based on reasonable suspicion. United States v. Coleman, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196534 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 22, 2020).*

Regardless of whether the Fourth Amendment was violated by the Texas Medical Board’s investigator, qualified immunity applies. Cotropia v. Chapman, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 33391 (5th Cir. Oct. 22, 2020).

This entry was posted in Exclusionary rule, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.