Author Archives: Hall

Wired: Here’s What a Google Subpoena Response Looks Like, Courtesy of the Epstein Files

Wired: Here’s What a Google Subpoena Response Looks Like, Courtesy of the Epstein Files by Maddie Varner (“The US Justice Department disclosures give fresh clues about how tech companies handle government inquiries about your data.”)

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on Wired: Here’s What a Google Subpoena Response Looks Like, Courtesy of the Epstein Files

M.D.Fla.: Frisk on entering VA hospital was justified on RS

Defendant’s frisk on entering a VA hospital could be justified as an area entry search, but the facts known to the officers, that defendant was already considered a safety risk, justified it by reasonable suspicion under Terry. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Frisk on entering VA hospital was justified on RS

CA4: Leasing property from a parolee doesn’t make that property subject to his parole search condition

When a person on parole owns property and lets others use or rent it, the others aren’t subject to the parolee’s search waiver. United States v. Perez, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5305 (4th Cir. Feb. 23, 2026):

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA4: Leasing property from a parolee doesn’t make that property subject to his parole search condition

D.N.J.: One without a DL can still have standing in the car he’s driving

Defendant was driving a borrowed car without a valid DL. He still has standing, and that’s not conditioned on a driver’s license. United States v. Huggins, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34758 (D.N.J. Feb. 20, 2026). Defendant’s vehicle was parked unlocked … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.J.: One without a DL can still have standing in the car he’s driving

D.Utah: Asking about drug history during traffic stop lacked RS and unreasonably extended stop

“Considering the totality of the circumstances, there are insufficient facts before the court to establish reasonable suspicion that would allow Officer Embley to prolong the stop and inquire about Kummer’s drug history. Reasonable suspicion is a low standard, but it … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on D.Utah: Asking about drug history during traffic stop lacked RS and unreasonably extended stop

S.D.N.Y.: No REP in what is shared with a cloud AI program

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in what is shared with a cloud AI program, even if it’s in anticipation of litigation. Therefore, no attorney-client privilege in what the client shares with AI trying to help his attorney. United … Continue reading →

Posted in AI, Apparent authority, Computer and cloud searches, Emergency / exigency, Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No REP in what is shared with a cloud AI program

CA7: Ptf has burden to adequately respond to 4A qualified immunity claim when made by defense

Plaintiff didn’t sufficiently plead a Fourth Amendment violation and overcoming qualified immunity from the officer’s seizing his notebook and perusing it and handing it to another officer. It’s his burden to deal with qualified immunity, and he didn’t adequately respond. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf has burden to adequately respond to 4A qualified immunity claim when made by defense

KY: Arrest warrant isn’t constitutionally required for a felony arrest

An arrest warrant isn’t constitutionally required for a felony arrest. Hernandez v. Commonwealth, 2026 Ky. LEXIS 7 (Feb. 19, 2026). There was no rationale entitlement to discovery of the name of the informant in this case, so defense counsel wasn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on KY: Arrest warrant isn’t constitutionally required for a felony arrest

D.Kan.: Ptf’s § 1983 case stayed where filed while underlying criminal case was ongoing

Plaintiff sued while his criminal trespass case was pending in state municipal court. The action is stayed because plaintiff can raise his constitutional claims there. Younger also counsels that. Spiehs v. Allen, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35038 (D. Kan. Feb. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Ptf’s § 1983 case stayed where filed while underlying criminal case was ongoing

CA9: Asking whether occupant of car was armed took three seconds and didn’t unreasonably extend stop

“The district court correctly held that the officers did not violate Torres’s Fourth Amendment rights by asking him whether he was armed. The officer’s question to Torres, which took no more than three seconds to ask and answer, did not … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Asking whether occupant of car was armed took three seconds and didn’t unreasonably extend stop

E.D.N.Y.: Where property was lawfully seized under 4A, delayed return isn’t a 4A violation

Plaintiff finances cars. When Suffolk County seized the cars from the buyers, they were allegedly really slow in returning them to Santander. Plaintiff admits the initial seizure was lawful, so the retention doesn’t ipso facto violate the Fourth Amendment. Santander … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Where property was lawfully seized under 4A, delayed return isn’t a 4A violation

This blog is 23 today

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on This blog is 23 today

MS.now: ICE whistleblower testifies to Congress about minimal training [including violating 4A]

MS.now: ICE whistleblower testifies to Congress about minimal training by Emily Berk & Julianne McShane (On MS.now, he testified that officers were trained to violate the Fourth Amendment.)

Posted in immigration searches | Comments Off on MS.now: ICE whistleblower testifies to Congress about minimal training [including violating 4A]

CA11: Off-site copying of def’s cell phone after the SW’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B).

Off-site copying of defendant’s cell phone after the warrant’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B). United States v. Hernandez, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 4990 (11th Cir. Feb. 19, 2026). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Ineffective assistance, Particularity | Comments Off on CA11: Off-site copying of def’s cell phone after the SW’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B).

OR: Exigency here was speculative and rejected

The state’s claim of exigency from potential destruction of evidence was speculative, and the motion to suppress should have been granted. As to his burglary conviction, it’s harmless, but not as to two other counts. State v. Gilliland, 347 Or. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OR: Exigency here was speculative and rejected

E.D.Pa.: Warrant not required to be shown at time of arrest

The Fourth Amendment does not require a warrant be provided at the time of arrest, and an arrest can occur with probable cause and without a warrant in felony cases. Mister v. Marino, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33508 (E.D. Pa. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Warrant not required to be shown at time of arrest

OR: Stop became a seizure when questions turned to travel plans

“Applying those principles here, we conclude that, under the totality of the circumstances, defendant was seized, at the latest, at 8:53 a.m., when Smith’s questions changed from general questions about defendant’s or P’s identity, to more probing questions about what … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on OR: Stop became a seizure when questions turned to travel plans

NY: Coercing a suspect out of his home for a warrantless arrest violates Payton

Coercing a suspect out of his home for a warrantless arrest violates Payton. [But here, the error is harmless on the murder and assault charges.] People v. Shaw, 2026 NY Slip Op 00961, 2026 N.Y. LEXIS 130 (Feb. 19, 2026):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on NY: Coercing a suspect out of his home for a warrantless arrest violates Payton

M.D.Fla.: Reporting requirements for real estate transactions under Bank Secrecy Act do not violate 4A

The financial reporting requirements for real estate transactions under the Bank Secrecy Act satisfy the statutory requirements which are more onerous than the Fourth Amendment requires under Shultz. Therefore, there’s no Fourth Amendment violation. An inquiry can be made, as … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Reporting requirements for real estate transactions under Bank Secrecy Act do not violate 4A

techdirt: It Looks Like The FBI Straight Up Lied To A Judge To Get Permission To Seize Georgia Voting Records

Begging the question: What consequences are there for a Franks violation, besides a Franks hearing and maybe just suppression of evidence? Or here, return of the evidence? Rebuke? Prosecution for false statement or worse? See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 (false … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on techdirt: It Looks Like The FBI Straight Up Lied To A Judge To Get Permission To Seize Georgia Voting Records