Author Archives: Hall

N.D.Ind.: PC doesn’t require actual showing of a crime

There was probable cause to stop defendant’s truck: “Probable cause is ‘not a high bar.’ Kaley v. United States, 571 U.S. 320, 338, 134 S. Ct. 1090, 188 L. Ed. 2d 46 (2014). It ‘does not require an actual showing … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: PC doesn’t require actual showing of a crime

N.D.Iowa: Ten day delay in getting SW for def’s car where he was in custody and investigation was ongoing was not unreasonable

There was probable cause for the search and seizure of defendant’s vehicle for evidence of a violent crime. The fact a plain view wasn’t possible at the moment of the stop doesn’t mean there wasn’t. The police department with the … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Ten day delay in getting SW for def’s car where he was in custody and investigation was ongoing was not unreasonable

D.Colo.: Federal law criminalizing marijuana makes dog sniff in recreational use state reasonable

Even though Colorado has decriminalized personal use of marijuana, a dog sniff is still reasonable under federal law because possession of marijuana is still a violation of federal law because it’s unlawful for “any purpose.” United States v. Spikes, 2021 … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Federal law criminalizing marijuana makes dog sniff in recreational use state reasonable

N.D.Ill.: Sender of package whose name wasn’t on it had standing

Defendant who orchestrated delivery of a package whose name wasn’t on it as sender or recipient had standing in the package. United States v. Williams, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88747 (N.D. Ill. May 10, 2021):

Posted in Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Sender of package whose name wasn’t on it had standing

CA8: A mere hunch possession of something might be criminal was not “immediately apparent” for plain view

Alleged plain view of glass vials on defendant’s couch wasn’t a legitimate plain view because the alleged incriminating nature of the objects wasn’t immediately apparent. It was maybe a hunch and not obvious at all. Grant of suppression motion affirmed. … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA8: A mere hunch possession of something might be criminal was not “immediately apparent” for plain view

IL: ER blood draw was private search, and results were obtainable by process

Defendant’s ER blood draw after he was admitted for an accident was by a private actor, and the results are obtainable by the state and admissible. People v. Mueller, 2021 IL App (2d) 190868, 2021 Ill. App. LEXIS 227 (May … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Private search, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IL: ER blood draw was private search, and results were obtainable by process

ABA, CJS: The Myth of Objectivity in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

Juval O. Scott, The Myth of Objectivity in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence, 36 Criminal Justice 13 (No. 1 Spring 2021):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on ABA, CJS: The Myth of Objectivity in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

N.D.Tex.: Motion to suppress 2½ months of pole camera recording untimely

The reasonableness of 2½ months of pole camera observation of defendant’s house was waived by not filing a motion to suppress until after the First Circuit granted en banc review on that issue and then a month later. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Pole cameras, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Motion to suppress 2½ months of pole camera recording untimely

PA: Stop for no LPN permitted running names of occupants

Not having a license plate justified defendant’s stop and then running names. Commonwealth v. Malloy, 2021 PA Super 90, 2021 Pa. Super. LEXIS 278 (May 7, 2021). The backup light being on while driving justifies a stop. People v. Ambrose, … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: Stop for no LPN permitted running names of occupants

FL2: Open container city code violation justifies SI

An open container in violation of municipal ordinance justifies a search incident in Florida. State v. Coleman, 2021 Fla. App. LEXIS 6497 (Fla. 2d DCA May 7, 2021):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Search incident | Comments Off on FL2: Open container city code violation justifies SI

CA7: Possibility an interloper put drug residue in trash out for collection doesn’t negate PC or what it might prove

The fact it’s possible that someone else could have dropped drug residue in defendant’s trash container at the street doesn’t negate probable cause. [It also shows the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy in trash containers at the street.] … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Possibility an interloper put drug residue in trash out for collection doesn’t negate PC or what it might prove

Cal.6: Fire capt’s search of cabinet of backyard shed unrelated to house fire wasn’t part of the exigency of the fire

A fire department captain in Santa Clara County searched a cabinet in a shed behind defendant’s house. The fire department was called to a house fire. He was looking for the source of smoke, and it wasn’t readily apparent the … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.6: Fire capt’s search of cabinet of backyard shed unrelated to house fire wasn’t part of the exigency of the fire

VI: Def walking into apt being searched with SW could be searched

Defendant who walked into an apartment being searched under a warrant could be searched himself, including the grocery bag he was carrying. People v. Matthias, 2021 V.I. LEXIS 23 (Apr. 30, 2021). Defendant’s backpack in the car couldn’t be searched … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Search incident, Warrant execution | Comments Off on VI: Def walking into apt being searched with SW could be searched

CA8: Def’s contradicting suppression hearing testimony at trial opened him to cross-examination on it

Where defendant’s testimony of his connection to the car materially changed between the suppression hearing and trial, the government could cross examine him on the contradictions under Simmons. United States v. Navarette, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 13458 (8th Cir. May … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA8: Def’s contradicting suppression hearing testimony at trial opened him to cross-examination on it

WY: Where the stop exceeds its purpose and becomes unreasonable, the fact it’s de minimus doesn’t make it reasonable

Where the stop exceeded reasonableness, the district court’s finding it was de minimus was error. It was less than the time for the dog sniff, but the dog had time to arrive. Mahaffy v. State, 2021 Wyo. LEXIS 71 (May … Continue reading →

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on WY: Where the stop exceeds its purpose and becomes unreasonable, the fact it’s de minimus doesn’t make it reasonable

E.D.N.C.: Nexus can be established by inference

Nexus may be established by inference and not direct evidence. United States v. White, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85454 (E.D. N.C. Mar. 17, 2021). Plaintiff was arrested and charged with two misdemeanors. Probable cause for one mooted consideration of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Nexus can be established by inference

CA2: Failure to promptly return property lawfully seized isn’t separate 4A claim

Where firearms were lawfully seized, there isn’t a separate Fourth Amendment claim for failure to promptly return them. Bello v. Rockland Cty., 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 13281 (2d Cir. May 5, 2021). Probable cause is required for administrative subpoenas under … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Seizure, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on CA2: Failure to promptly return property lawfully seized isn’t separate 4A claim

CA11: 24 officers raiding wrong house subject to QI

24 officers raiding the wrong house [somehow] are entitled to qualified immunity. Norris v. Hicks, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 13272 (11th Cir. May 5, 2021):

Posted in Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA11: 24 officers raiding wrong house subject to QI

N.D.Ind.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to provide the particularity, but it can if incorporated

The search warrant here is directed at a place and it’s not required to tie a person to it, unless it aids particularity. The affidavit for the warrant does not need to be particular but the warrant itself does. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Particularity, Staleness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to provide the particularity, but it can if incorporated

LATimes: The FBI raided her home to find Nancy Pelosi’s laptop. But was she the wrong woman?

LATimes: The FBI raided her home to find Nancy Pelosi’s laptop. But was she the wrong woman? (Homer, AK, because she looked like the alleged thief)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on LATimes: The FBI raided her home to find Nancy Pelosi’s laptop. But was she the wrong woman?