Author Archives: Hall

MS.now: ICE whistleblower testifies to Congress about minimal training [including violating 4A]

MS.now: ICE whistleblower testifies to Congress about minimal training by Emily Berk & Julianne McShane (On MS.now, he testified that officers were trained to violate the Fourth Amendment.)

Posted in immigration searches | Comments Off on MS.now: ICE whistleblower testifies to Congress about minimal training [including violating 4A]

CA11: Off-site copying of def’s cell phone after the SW’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B).

Off-site copying of defendant’s cell phone after the warrant’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B). United States v. Hernandez, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 4990 (11th Cir. Feb. 19, 2026). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Ineffective assistance, Particularity | Comments Off on CA11: Off-site copying of def’s cell phone after the SW’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B).

OR: Exigency here was speculative and rejected

The state’s claim of exigency from potential destruction of evidence was speculative, and the motion to suppress should have been granted. As to his burglary conviction, it’s harmless, but not as to two other counts. State v. Gilliland, 347 Or. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OR: Exigency here was speculative and rejected

E.D.Pa.: Warrant not required to be shown at time of arrest

The Fourth Amendment does not require a warrant be provided at the time of arrest, and an arrest can occur with probable cause and without a warrant in felony cases. Mister v. Marino, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33508 (E.D. Pa. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Warrant not required to be shown at time of arrest

OR: Stop became a seizure when questions turned to travel plans

“Applying those principles here, we conclude that, under the totality of the circumstances, defendant was seized, at the latest, at 8:53 a.m., when Smith’s questions changed from general questions about defendant’s or P’s identity, to more probing questions about what … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on OR: Stop became a seizure when questions turned to travel plans

NY: Coercing a suspect out of his home for a warrantless arrest violates Payton

Coercing a suspect out of his home for a warrantless arrest violates Payton. [But here, the error is harmless on the murder and assault charges.] People v. Shaw, 2026 NY Slip Op 00961, 2026 N.Y. LEXIS 130 (Feb. 19, 2026):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on NY: Coercing a suspect out of his home for a warrantless arrest violates Payton

M.D.Fla.: Reporting requirements for real estate transactions under Bank Secrecy Act do not violate 4A

The financial reporting requirements for real estate transactions under the Bank Secrecy Act satisfy the statutory requirements which are more onerous than the Fourth Amendment requires under Shultz. Therefore, there’s no Fourth Amendment violation. An inquiry can be made, as … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Reporting requirements for real estate transactions under Bank Secrecy Act do not violate 4A

techdirt: It Looks Like The FBI Straight Up Lied To A Judge To Get Permission To Seize Georgia Voting Records

Begging the question: What consequences are there for a Franks violation, besides a Franks hearing and maybe just suppression of evidence? Or here, return of the evidence? Rebuke? Prosecution for false statement or worse? See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 (false … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on techdirt: It Looks Like The FBI Straight Up Lied To A Judge To Get Permission To Seize Georgia Voting Records

OH8: Affidavit for SW was improperly admitted into evidence of guilt at trial

Affidavit for search warrant was improperly admitted into evidence of guilt at trial. It was full of hearsay and the burden for probable cause is too low for reasonable doubt. Also, admitting a video violated the confrontation clause. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on OH8: Affidavit for SW was improperly admitted into evidence of guilt at trial

OR: Pole camera doesn’t violate state constitution

Pole camera observation didn’t violate the Oregon Constitution. State v. Lane, 347 Or. App. 229 (Feb. 19, 2026). Probable cause developed after the stop but before the search under the automobile exception. There was also consent. United States v. Camorlinga, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Plain view, feel, smell, Pole cameras, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Pole camera doesn’t violate state constitution

M.D.Fla.: SW return filed outside state law time limit isn’t a Franks issue

A search warrant return outside the state law time limit by law is not a Franks issue. United States v. Davis, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33100 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 18, 2026). Plaintiff “fails to specifically address, and thus waives any … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Warrant papers | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: SW return filed outside state law time limit isn’t a Franks issue

C.D.Cal.: Suit over seizure of guns on mental health order dismissed

Officers had a court order under Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 8100 for taking plaintiff’s guns because of a mental health hold. They came to his house but he was gone. They talked to him through his Ring doorbell. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Suit over seizure of guns on mental health order dismissed

Reason: Was It a Coincidental Traffic Stop or AI-Powered Surveillance?

Reason: Was It a Coincidental Traffic Stop or AI-Powered Surveillance? by Mattha Busby (“Seth Ferranti was driving his Ford pickup on a southeastern Nebraska stretch of the interstate in November 2024 when law enforcement pulled him over, claiming that he … Continue reading

Posted in AI | Comments Off on Reason: Was It a Coincidental Traffic Stop or AI-Powered Surveillance?

NPR: Some cities are ditching license plate readers over immigration surveillance concerns

NPR: Some cities are ditching license plate readers over immigration surveillance concerns by Jude Joffe-Block (“The use of automatic license plate readers has exploded across the country in recent years. The cameras on roads and freeways that take images of … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on NPR: Some cities are ditching license plate readers over immigration surveillance concerns

E.D.N.Y.: It’s not actually required a cell phone be involved in a crime; it’s whether it is likely it was

It’s not constitutionally required to show that a cell phone was actually used in a crime for probable cause to search it. It’s enough that it likely could have. “A law enforcement-affiant’s personal expertise combined with attestation to a defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Nexus, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: It’s not actually required a cell phone be involved in a crime; it’s whether it is likely it was

TN: No standing in someone else’s curtilage

Defendant pulled his car into a convenient driveway for his stop, but he had no standing in the curtilage because it wasn’t his place. The car he had standing in, but this was a plain view. State v. Gunn, 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on TN: No standing in someone else’s curtilage

PA: RS not needed to seize firearm on car seat in plain view during traffic stop

The inherent dangers in a traffic stop justified the officer doing a protective sweep to seize a firearm on the seat in plain view, despite lack of any sense that defendant was going to use it. Commonwealth v. Hawkins-Davenport, 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: RS not needed to seize firearm on car seat in plain view during traffic stop

AR: Trial counsel’s comment motion to suppress ruling was correct didn’t bind appellate counsel

A motion to suppress once made and denied doesn’t have to be renewed during the proof. Trial counsel’s statement that the ruling was correct didn’t bind appellate counsel to raise it, but it loses on the merits anyway. Cobb v. … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Trial counsel’s comment motion to suppress ruling was correct didn’t bind appellate counsel

Lincoln Square: Hate ICE? Social Media Companies Will Snitch on You.

Lincoln Square: Hate ICE? Social Media Companies Will Snitch on You. by Frank Figliuzzi (FBI retired):

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on Lincoln Square: Hate ICE? Social Media Companies Will Snitch on You.

E.D.Mo.: Such is the risk of a no-knock warrant

“This case arises from an officer shooting the target of a search warrant. Detective Thomas Strode obtained a warrant to search Don Clark’s residence for illegal guns and drugs. As officers entered without knocking, Clark shot at the officers but … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Knock and announce, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Such is the risk of a no-knock warrant