Author Archives: Hall

S.D.Ill.: Extrinsic evidence is admissible in a Franks challenge

Extrinsic evidence of alleged falsity in a Franks challenge is admissible. United States v. Smith, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234002 (S.D. Ill. Dec. 20, 2022). Questioning defendant about the presence of a firearm in his vehicle fell within the Quarles … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Extrinsic evidence is admissible in a Franks challenge

Nevada recognizes a private right of action for violation of the state constitution’s search and seizure guarantee

Nevada recognizes a private right of action for violation of the state constitution’s search and seizure guarantee. Plaintiff sued in federal court for a strip search going into a prison that produced nothing and also resulted in her being barred … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Nexus, State constitution | Comments Off on Nevada recognizes a private right of action for violation of the state constitution’s search and seizure guarantee

D.Minn.: All theories to suppress must be raised to USMJ on referral or it’s waived

Defendant’s storage unit had the doors and handles tested with Ion Scanning. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in that. Before the USDJ, however, he raised it was a trespass to do it as the officers did. That’s waived … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Minn.: All theories to suppress must be raised to USMJ on referral or it’s waived

E.D.Mich.: No sanction for automatic purge of bodycam video of this raid

The raid in this case was recorded on bodycams but the official retention policy at the time was to hold video for only 60 days unless it was flagged to be kept despite the fact that cases take longer than … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Community caretaking function, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No sanction for automatic purge of bodycam video of this raid

M.D.Fla.: The fact a USMJ issued SW doesn’t preclude that judge from hearing a motion to suppress

The fact a USMJ issued a search warrant doesn’t preclude that judge from hearing a motion to suppress. United States v. Silva, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 233243 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 29, 2022). State court’s finding of procedural default on Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: The fact a USMJ issued SW doesn’t preclude that judge from hearing a motion to suppress

Cal.: Officer spotlighting a parked car and then approaching isn’t necessarily a seizure

“A sheriff’s deputy patrolling after dark saw three people sitting in a legally parked car in a residential neighborhood, smoking something. He pulled up behind the car, illuminated it with a spotlight, and approached on foot. We granted review to … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on Cal.: Officer spotlighting a parked car and then approaching isn’t necessarily a seizure

NYT: Their Flights Canceled, Southwest Travelers Were Threatened With Arrest by

NYT: Their Flights Canceled, Southwest Travelers Were Threatened With Arrest by Michael Levinson (“A police officer at Nashville International Airport told travelers whose Southwest flights had been canceled that they would be arrested for trespassing if they did not leave … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYT: Their Flights Canceled, Southwest Travelers Were Threatened With Arrest by

WI: REP in Cloud storage of data from warrantless search

A public employee’s Dropbox account was searched without a warrant by seeking to enter by his user name and changing the password. There is a reasonable expectation of privacy in Cloud storage of digital data when one does not share … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on WI: REP in Cloud storage of data from warrantless search

OR: Computer hard drive with contraband could be destroyed with guilty plea

By defendant’s plea to a sex and child porn offense, the state could destroy the computer hard drives where the contraband was found. The seizure was in 2003, and the trial was 2017. State v. Forker, 323 Or. App. 323 … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OR: Computer hard drive with contraband could be destroyed with guilty plea

CA9: 4A requires no less intrusive measures for inventory

The officers impounding defendant’s vehicle weren’t constitutionally required to allow him to contact others to take possession of the vehicle for him. United States v. Anderson, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 35865 (9th Cir. Dec. 29, 2022). See Metropolitan News-Enterprise Three … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA9: 4A requires no less intrusive measures for inventory

WaPo: Lawsuit alleges D.C. Housing’s cameras could ‘capture intimate details’

[I don’t normally bother to mention lawsuits until resolved, but SCOTUS is considering a pole camera case for conference in the next month or so.] WaPo: Lawsuit alleges D.C. Housing’s cameras could ‘capture intimate details’ by Justin Wm. Moyer:

Posted in Pole cameras, Video surveillance | Comments Off on WaPo: Lawsuit alleges D.C. Housing’s cameras could ‘capture intimate details’

N.D.Okla.: NCIS SW in Japan as violation of Posse Comitatus Act was waived by guilty plea

Defendant was the subject of an NCIS search warrant while stationed in Japan. That led to his prosecution in the Northern District of Oklahoma. His guilty plea waived his claim the Posse Comitatus Act was somehow violated. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Overseizure, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: NCIS SW in Japan as violation of Posse Comitatus Act was waived by guilty plea

NY Monroe Co.: Parts of NY red flag law may violate 2A and 4A

Parts of the NY red flag law concern the court. A taking of firearms should be based on a mental health professional’s assessment of danger to protect both Second and Fourth Amendment rights and procedural rights. G.W. v. C.N., 2022 … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on NY Monroe Co.: Parts of NY red flag law may violate 2A and 4A

E.D.N.Y.: “MS-13 paraphernalia, photographs, and/or graffiti” satisfied particularity

In a RICO prosecution of MS-13, the search warrant included “MS-13 paraphernalia, photographs, and/or graffiti” and this satisfied particularity. United States v. Saenz, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231895 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 27, 2022):

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: “MS-13 paraphernalia, photographs, and/or graffiti” satisfied particularity

TN: SW for cell phone images of drugs supported accidental finding of CP

Officers had a search warrant for defendant’s phone to look for images and messages about drug transactions. That led them to stumble upon child pornography as well. The warrant and search were valid. State v. Greenman, 2022 Tenn. Crim. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on TN: SW for cell phone images of drugs supported accidental finding of CP

CA3: SOL for arrest and search under § 1983 runs from then

The SOL begins with plaintiff’s arrest and search, not the prosecution. Here it was time-barred. (Plaintiff also doesn’t establish any grounds for equitable tolling other than the library was inaccessible during Covid, and he did nothing for over two years.) … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA3: SOL for arrest and search under § 1983 runs from then

CA8: “[E]ven if a technical violation of Nebraska law occurred when signing the warrant that is not a basis for suppressing the evidence” under 4A

“[E]ven if a technical violation of Nebraska law occurred when signing the warrant that is not a basis for suppressing the evidence” under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Becker, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 35626 (8th Cir. Dec. 27, 2022). … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: “[E]ven if a technical violation of Nebraska law occurred when signing the warrant that is not a basis for suppressing the evidence” under 4A

NY3: On parole out of your county and lying about travels RS for parole search

Defendant was on parole and stopped outside his residence county. That was reasonable suspicion for a parole search. Plus, defendant’s multiple and inconsistent explanations about his travels, which the police officers knew were false, coupled with his parole situation and … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY3: On parole out of your county and lying about travels RS for parole search

CA6: Affidavit circumstantially supported nexus

There was nexus to defendant’s home as a base of operations for drug sales based on circumstantial evidence in the affidavit for warrant. United States v. Pointer, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 35506 (6th Cir. Dec. 20, 2022).* The search warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: Affidavit circumstantially supported nexus

PA: Attachment to a warrant can provide particularity

The attachment to a warrant can provide particularity. While one ground to suppress was mostly litigated, it was apparent the other ground wasn’t waived or abandoned. Commonwealth v. Young, 2022 PA Super 220 (Dec. 23, 2022).* “Here, the record demonstrates … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Attachment to a warrant can provide particularity