Author Archives: Hall

W.D.N.Y.: Moving car without PC for later dog sniff hours later tainted SW based on dog alert

Defendant’s vehicle was stopped and ultimately removed to another location for a dog sniff to get probable cause for a search warrant for the car. The removal was unreasonable and justified under the Fourth Amendment. The dog sniff was several … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Moving car without PC for later dog sniff hours later tainted SW based on dog alert

CA6: Erroneous LEO database info still justified stop

Officers had information from the state DL and LPN database that defendant’s car had no insurance. That justified the stop even if it turned out to be erroneous. United States v. Conley, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 856 (6th Cir. Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Erroneous LEO database info still justified stop

E.D.Tenn.: 11 day delay in getting computer SW not unreasonable

Depending on how one counted the time between the seizure of the cell phone and the search warrant, it was either 3 or 11 days, and either is reasonable. United States v. Deakins, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6661 (E.D. Tenn. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: 11 day delay in getting computer SW not unreasonable

E.D.N.Y.: Without knowing what to suppress, motion to suppress is premature

Defendant’s motion to suppress the search of Device A is premature since the product of the search isn’t yet known. Also, his motion to suppress the search of Device B is denied for lack of standing. It isn’t his. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Without knowing what to suppress, motion to suppress is premature

CA6: Potential defenses don’t undermine PC for arrest

Potential defenses to a case plaintiff was arrested for do not nullify the probable cause. Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 865 (6th Cir. Jan. 11, 2023):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Potential defenses don’t undermine PC for arrest

CA6: Anonymous tip shown reliable enough for probation search

This anonymous tip of criminality of a probationer was shown to be reliable enough for reasonable suspicion. United States v. Rogers, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 786 (6th Cir. Jan. 11, 2023). Defendant is accused of vandalizing the Anchorage Jewish Museum. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Anonymous tip shown reliable enough for probation search

CA6: Water heard running in hotel room bathroom supported exigency for avoiding destruction of evidence

Water heard running in the bathroom of a hotel room justified entry to avoid potential destruction of evidence. United States v. Hill, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 785 (6th Cir. Jan. 11, 2023). Defendant’s Franks challenge doesn’t undermine the two critical … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: Water heard running in hotel room bathroom supported exigency for avoiding destruction of evidence

Bloomberg: Google Keyword Search Warrants Questioned by Colorado Lawyers

Bloomberg Law: Google Keyword-Search Warrants Questioned by Colorado Lawyers (“Lawyers for the arson case defendant maintain that Google must search billions of users to respond to keyword search warrants, raising privacy implications far beyond Colorado. ‘This is a really significant new … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Bloomberg: Google Keyword Search Warrants Questioned by Colorado Lawyers

M.D.Pa.: Refusal to show hands when ordered shows no seizure

Defendant’s refusal to show his hands when ordered to by the officer was not a seizure. United States v. Garner, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5400 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2023).* Defendant’s stop was justified and it escalated to reasonable suspicion … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Refusal to show hands when ordered shows no seizure

CA6: New information about a search doesn’t qualify for successor habeas

Alleged new information about the search of defendant’s property doesn’t allege actual innocence and thus is not grounds for a successor habeas. In re Fisher, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 677 (6th Cir. Jan. 11, 2023). 2255 petitioner’s ineffectiveness claim on … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Strip search | Comments Off on CA6: New information about a search doesn’t qualify for successor habeas

IA: “Driving while black” rejected because stop was objectively reasonable

Defendant sought to cast his stop as pretextual and “driving while black,” but it’s rejected because the stop was objectively reasonable. “We conclude that while the officer’s actions placed Cyrus in a situation with an unarguable ‘moral and instinctive pressure[ … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Pretext | Comments Off on IA: “Driving while black” rejected because stop was objectively reasonable

IA: State failure to object to lack of Franks preliminary showing results in hearing, but def fails anyway

Defendant got a Franks hearing without an adequate showing, and the state didn’t object. So the court of appeals considers the showing at the hearing over the state’s objection, and defendant fails to show recklessness or intentional false statement or … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: State failure to object to lack of Franks preliminary showing results in hearing, but def fails anyway

CA4: Terry stop is not necessarily custody for Miranda purposes

A Terry stop is not necessarily custody for Miranda purposes. They can be, but they focus on different questions. United States v. Leggette, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 521 n.5 (4th Cir. Jan. 10, 2023). Collective knowledge of the officers involved … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Custody | Comments Off on CA4: Terry stop is not necessarily custody for Miranda purposes

D.N.J.: No 6A right to have counsel present at execution of a DNA warrant in the jail

There is no Sixth Amendment right for counsel to be present when a DNA sample is taken from defendant at the jail by warrant. United States v. Hubbard, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3661 (D.N.J. Jan. 9, 2023). CBP had reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Computer and cloud searches, DNA, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.N.J.: No 6A right to have counsel present at execution of a DNA warrant in the jail

CA8: An attempted arrest isn’t a seizure, even without PC

“However, an attempted arrest alone, even if unsupported by probable cause, is insufficient to invoke Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable seizures. See Hodari D., 499 U.S. at 626 (‘The word “seizure” … does not remotely apply … to the prospect … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: An attempted arrest isn’t a seizure, even without PC

CA7: Ptf’s civil Franks claim survives SJ because it stated a claim

“Here, a reasonable jury could find that Buonadonna intentionally or recklessly included material false statements and withheld material exculpatory information. Buonadonna admits that he read the protective order and knew that it did not bar communication between Klein and Salatas. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf’s civil Franks claim survives SJ because it stated a claim

IL: Officers executing SW lawfully seized gun in plain view

The trial court erred in suppressing evidence. The officers were lawfully on the premises with a warrant when a gun was seen in plain view. People v. Serrato, 2023 IL App (2d) 220100, 2023 Ill. App. LEXIS 3 (Jan. 6, … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Officers executing SW lawfully seized gun in plain view

CA5: No suppression for no-knock violation

There is no suppression remedy for an unjustified no-knock warrant. United States v. Bryant, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 355 (5th Cir. Jan. 6, 2023). Defendant didn’t enter a conditional plea, so his guilty plea waived his Fourth Amendment claim. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Knock and announce, Nexus, Waiver | Comments Off on CA5: No suppression for no-knock violation

CA6: Govt completely failed to show nexus or PC thus no GFE

The affidavits supporting the records warrant for defendant’s home did not establish nexus between his alleged drug activity, drug records, and his address. Also, the affidavit did not allege that defendant dealt drugs from the house or that he even … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Protective sweep, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA6: Govt completely failed to show nexus or PC thus no GFE

Army: Remotely wiping seized cell phone and watch tampered with search

The prosecution established defendant interfered with a search by remotely wiping her cell phone and watch when she knew they were in the possession of CID and to be searched in a manslaughter investigation. United States v. Strong, 2023 CCA … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Digital Searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on Army: Remotely wiping seized cell phone and watch tampered with search