D.N.J.: No 6A right to have counsel present at execution of a DNA warrant in the jail

There is no Sixth Amendment right for counsel to be present when a DNA sample is taken from defendant at the jail by warrant. United States v. Hubbard, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3661 (D.N.J. Jan. 9, 2023).

CBP had reasonable suspicion for a border search of defendant’s electronics because they developed information that he was exporting sensitive marine electronic equipment to China, which they then found in an extended warranted search of his equipment. United States v. Qin, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 430 (1st Cir. Jan. 9, 2023).

Even if the officer had been reckless in omission of the CI’s criminal history, defendant fails the materiality prong in his Franks challenge. United States v. Moreno, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3435 (D. Idaho Jan. 6, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Border search, Computer and cloud searches, DNA, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.