Author Archives: Hall

E.D.Pa.: Cover story at time of justified stop didn’t make it unreasonable

Months of electronic surveillance gave probable cause for defendant’s stop and search. Police use of a cover story for the stop was reasonable to prevent other co-conspirators from finding out. United States v. Arrington, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222969 (E.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Cover story at time of justified stop didn’t make it unreasonable

D.Mass.: Copying electronic device for delayed search is not per se unreasonable

In an electronic search, the government copied the device’s memory for later search, and the probable cause did not get stale during the delay. Because of the capacity of electronic devices, this is the most efficient manner of searching. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Copying electronic device for delayed search is not per se unreasonable

CA8: Takedown was lawful, assault thereafter wasn’t

Plaintiff’s takedown was lawful, but not the assault after he was down. “It is even more clearly established now. A suspect’s ‘right[] to be free from excessive force [is] violated if officers choke, kick, or punch [him] when [he is] … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Takedown was lawful, assault thereafter wasn’t

CA6: Arrest based on unreliable eyewitness violates clearly established law

“Our precedent holds that it was clearly established that an officer may not arrest an individual based solely on an eyewitness account that is untruthful or unreliable. That is exactly what happened here when Officer Wieber learned that the prior … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Arrest based on unreliable eyewitness violates clearly established law

404 Media: Location Data Firm Offers to Help Cops Track Targets via Doctor Visits

404 Media: Location Data Firm Offers to Help Cops Track Targets via Doctor Visits by Joseph Cox (“A location data company is asking police for the address of specific people’s doctors in case that can be useful in finding their … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on 404 Media: Location Data Firm Offers to Help Cops Track Targets via Doctor Visits

Drug dog nose into a car window

“The drug dog’s fleeting touch of the passenger door and de minimus intrusion into the vehicle cabin through a window left open by a passenger does not justify the exclusion of evidence under the Supreme Court’s Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.” It … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on Drug dog nose into a car window

PA: State failed in its burden of proof on inventory policy

The state failed to put on proof of the impoundment and inventory policy, so the trial court erred in finding it was reasonable. Commonwealth v. Brinson, 2024 PA Super 293, 2024 Pa. Super. LEXIS 536 (Dec. 9, 2024). Defendant’s car … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Burden of proof, Exclusionary rule, Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on PA: State failed in its burden of proof on inventory policy

CA8: Car on car hauler’s tractor trailer still mobile for automobile exception

Defendant shipped a car on a car hauler paying in advance. All things considered, the hauler suspected drugs were involved because it had happened to him before. He called HSI which came to investigate. On the totality, there was probable … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception | Comments Off on CA8: Car on car hauler’s tractor trailer still mobile for automobile exception

ND: Calling 911 about OD’g child in your house is exigency for entry

Calling 911 that the child you’re caring for OD’ed on your fentanyl is consent to their emergency entry. State v. Gothberg, 2024 ND 217, 2024 N.D. LEXIS 221 (Dec. 5, 2024). 2255 petitioner pled guilty knowing the facts of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on ND: Calling 911 about OD’g child in your house is exigency for entry

E.D.Mo.: Squatter owner had knowledge of still had no standing

Defendant was essentially a squatter who was wrongfully on the premises and had no standing. The owner lived on the second floor, and he squatted on the first floor for months. The building was condemned. His claim the owner’s tolerating … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Squatter owner had knowledge of still had no standing

TN: Def’s dashcam was searched with a warrant

Defendant had a dashcam, and the officer got a warrant for it. While the video was bad, the audio supported the basis for the stop. State v. Callahan, 2024 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 546 (Dec. 6, 2024).* There was reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on TN: Def’s dashcam was searched with a warrant

ABAJ: What laws could Trump invoke to fast track deportations?

ABAJ: What laws could Trump invoke to fast track deportations? by Debra Cassens Weiss (“‘The Insurrection Act does not (and could not) authorize the violation of constitutional rights,’ she writes. ‘For instance, if soldiers deployed under the Insurrection Act searched … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on ABAJ: What laws could Trump invoke to fast track deportations?

VI: GPS monitoring for pretrial release can be reasonable; here it was consented to as well

The VI code and rules of criminal procedure provide for electronic monitoring as a condition of pretrial release. GPS tracking is a search and involves a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy and would be reasonable if justified. Here it was … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VI: GPS monitoring for pretrial release can be reasonable; here it was consented to as well

IL: Smell of raw cannabis from car in a recreational state is still PC

“In sum, we hold that the odor of raw cannabis coming from a vehicle being operated on an Illinois highway, alone, is sufficient to provide police officers, who are trained and experienced in distinguishing between burnt and raw cannabis, with … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on IL: Smell of raw cannabis from car in a recreational state is still PC

NY3: No REP in SHU surveillance

Defendant was in a special housing unit in a NY state prison. He knew he was under constant surveillance. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in admissions he made caught on video. People v. Ashcroft, 2024 NY Slip Op … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Surveillance technology, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NY3: No REP in SHU surveillance

E.D.Mich.: PC and nexus to cell phone shown by drug deal arranged on an app

Probable cause and a nexus to defendant’s phone was shown because of arranging drug transactions through its apps. United States v. Hughes, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219482 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 4, 2024). Probable cause didn’t have to be decided because … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: PC and nexus to cell phone shown by drug deal arranged on an app

W.D.Tex.: Texas Request to Examine Statute fails under Patel, but rev’d by CA5

Texas’s Request to Examine Statute (“RTE Statute”; Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code §§ 12.151-12.156) violates Patel. “The issue before the court and, accordingly, this Report and Recommendation are not about whether the Attorney General has a right to request information from … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Texas Request to Examine Statute fails under Patel, but rev’d by CA5

Forbes: FinCEN Says Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) Reports Are Voluntary Following Court Decision

Forbes: FinCEN Says Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) Reports Are Voluntary Following Court Decision. My post on the case here

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Forbes: FinCEN Says Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) Reports Are Voluntary Following Court Decision

S.D.W.Va.: Issuance of a criminal citation is not a seizure

Issuance of a hunting violation citation is not a seizure. Even if it was, there was probable cause. Defendant wildlife officer’s seizure of antlers from a taxidermist can proceed. Craft v. Gills, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219453 (S.D. W.Va. Dec. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Issuance of a criminal citation is not a seizure

E.D.Mo.: Evidence of the search comes in because it “completes the story”

“‘Evidence of other wrongful conduct is considered intrinsic when it is offered for the purpose of providing the context in which the charged crime occurred.’ … ‘Intrinsic evidence may help to fill the gaps in the jury’s understanding of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Evidence of the search comes in because it “completes the story”