CA8: Car on car hauler’s tractor trailer still mobile for automobile exception

Defendant shipped a car on a car hauler paying in advance. All things considered, the hauler suspected drugs were involved because it had happened to him before. He called HSI which came to investigate. On the totality, there was probable cause that the car had drugs in it when it was searched. Even on the car hauler trailer, it was “inherently mobile” for the automobile exception to apply. United States v. Mims, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 31017 (8th Cir. Dec. 9, 2024).

There was reasonable suspicion for continuing the stop in this case because of defendant’s movements and words. The officer finally called in a drug dog because defendant didn’t know whether there would be drugs in his car. Suppression order reversed. State v. Tannehill, 2024 OK CR 32, 2024 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 30 (Dec. 5, 2024).*

Plaintiff’s Bivens false arrest claim fails on merits because of probable cause. Lynch v. United States, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30973 (7th Cir. Dec. 5, 2024).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.