S.D.W.Va.: Issuance of a criminal citation is not a seizure

Issuance of a hunting violation citation is not a seizure. Even if it was, there was probable cause. Defendant wildlife officer’s seizure of antlers from a taxidermist can proceed. Craft v. Gills, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219453 (S.D. W.Va. Dec. 4, 2024).

As to 2254, Stone v. Powell is a merits claim, not an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. But on the latter, petitioner would have to show he would prevail on the merits of the claim, and he doesn’t. It was all reasonable. Service v. Noeth, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219196 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 4, 2024).*

Even if the reason for the stop was wrong, it was a reasonable mistake of fact and there were other reasons for a stop. United States v. Dixon, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219318 (D.S.C. Dec. 4, 2024).*

Correction omissions, “This revised affidavit might reduce below the level of metaphysical certainty that Mr. Banks is culpable for a crime, but it does not reduce below the probable cause threshold the inference that a crime occurred or that evidence of the crime would be found in the apartment in question to support the warrant.” United States v. Banks, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218966 (D. Me. Dec. 4, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.