Monthly Archives: July 2026

CA7: Scrolling through def’s cell phone was a reasonable border search

Scrolling through defendant’s cell phone was a reasonable border search. United States v. Eta, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 19568 (7th Cir. July 6, 2026):

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on CA7: Scrolling through def’s cell phone was a reasonable border search

E.D.Ark.: Bivens not extended to knock-and-announce violation and shooting; FTCA applies instead

Bivens won’t be extended to an alleged knock-and-announce violation and a police shooting of the homeowner. SCOTUS should just go ahead and abandon Bivens. It proceeds as an FTCA case. Malinowski v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148126 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Nexus, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Bivens not extended to knock-and-announce violation and shooting; FTCA applies instead

D.Mont.: This ping warrant was based on PC and was not governed by Chatrie

This cell phone ping warrant was based on a showing of probable cause. It was a one-time deal and didn’t involve the factors of Chatrie and geofence warrants. United States v. Kunz, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148872 (D. Mont. July … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Mont.: This ping warrant was based on PC and was not governed by Chatrie

KY: Unrelated questions during ongoing traffic stop didn’t extend it under Rodriguez

While the officer asked unrelated questions during the traffic stop, the mission of the stop was ongoing throughout. Therefore, the questions didn’t really extend the stop. Miller v. Commonwealth, 2026 Ky. App. LEXIS 64 (July 2, 2026). The officer saw … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on KY: Unrelated questions during ongoing traffic stop didn’t extend it under Rodriguez

TX1: Defendant had no REP in a package of drugs he never possessed and on another person

Defendant lacked standing to suppress 4,100 grams of ketamine seized from Brown because he never possessed the package, had no reasonable expectation of privacy in package of drugs carried by Brown, and the ketamine was recovered away from him during … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on TX1: Defendant had no REP in a package of drugs he never possessed and on another person

Stone v. Powell decided 50 years ago today

Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465 (1976), barring habeas review of Fourth Amendment claims was decided 50 years ago today.

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on Stone v. Powell decided 50 years ago today

DC: Officers were a good ways away from def when he fled without any apparent reason

“We now hold that the officers had the requisite reasonable articulable suspicion to justify their seizure of D.W. when they grabbed his leg. We reach that conclusion largely because D.W. ran upon the mere sight of police officers approaching from … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DC: Officers were a good ways away from def when he fled without any apparent reason

Cell phone GPS: WaPo: This little blue dot on your phone is a revolutionary invention

WaPo: This little blue dot on your phone is a revolutionary invention by Katherine Dunn (“U.S. policy used to jam up GPS. Now, those signals beam into your pocket.”):

Posted in Cell phones, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on Cell phone GPS: WaPo: This little blue dot on your phone is a revolutionary invention

D.S.D.: No RS on totality when drug dog called for

The USMJ found that the officers abandoned the mission of the traffic stop (for Rodriguez purposes) when they called for the drug dog. So, the question is then whether there was reasonable suspicion at that point, and the answer is … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: No RS on totality when drug dog called for

Cal.4: State’s argument of exigency for DUI blood draw boiled down to “there’s always exigency”

“Ultimately, Mitchell’s references to ‘rival priorities,’ ‘more pressing needs,’ and ‘other pressing duties’ of police officers (588 U.S. at p. 856; see id. at pp. 840, 851), must be understood in the context of the opinion’s focus on an officer … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Cal.4: State’s argument of exigency for DUI blood draw boiled down to “there’s always exigency”

SC: Police didn’t need a SW to access def’s bondsman’s GPS monitoring of him because he agreed to GPS monitoring for release

Defendant submitted to GPS monitoring by his bondsman as a condition of bail, and the police could call the bondsman for the GPS information to connect defendant to a new crime without a warrant. State v. Eberhart, 2026 S.C. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on SC: Police didn’t need a SW to access def’s bondsman’s GPS monitoring of him because he agreed to GPS monitoring for release

N.D.Ga.: Standing has to be shown for the time of the search, not at some time in the past

“Earl was required to show, not that he had an expectation of privacy in the home at some time, but that he had that expectation at the time of the search. United States v. Brazel, 102 F.3d 1120, 1148 (11th … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Standing has to be shown for the time of the search, not at some time in the past

Fed.Cir.: VA’s determination here for mandatory in-home reassessment visits did not violate 4A under Wyman v. James

The VA’s determination here for mandatory in-home reassessment visits did not violate the Fourth Amendment under Wyman v. James. The statute gives the VA that discretion. Latham v. Sec’y of Veterans Affairs, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 17328 (Fed. Cir. June … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on Fed.Cir.: VA’s determination here for mandatory in-home reassessment visits did not violate 4A under Wyman v. James

E.D.Mich.: Full forensic search of a def’s university computer violated particularity and became a general warrant

The motion to suppress the search of devices for lack of particularity is granted, but the cloud search is not. Defendant is accused of hacking into student accounts on the University of Michigan’s computer system. The IT policy says that … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, General warrant | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Full forensic search of a def’s university computer violated particularity and became a general warrant

E.D.N.Y.: Cell phone tower dump was with GF; issue left open by Carpenter

A tower dump warrant is an issue left open in Carpenter, 585 U.S. at 316, and the police effort here was valid under the good faith exception. United States v. Campbell, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146360 (E.D.N.Y. June 30, 2026):

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Cell phone tower dump was with GF; issue left open by Carpenter

OH6: RS not needed for dog sniff of car on curtilage during SW execution on house

Officers had a warrant for defendant’s house, and they didn’t need reasonable suspicion for a drug dog sniff of his car parked in the driveway. State v. Desarro, 2026-Ohio-1672, 2026 Ohio App. LEXIS 1692 (6th Dist. May 7, 2026).* “We … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on OH6: RS not needed for dog sniff of car on curtilage during SW execution on house