MT: Exigency is found in the totality of circumstances

In a domestic dispute, officers had exigent circumstances to enter on the totality of circumstances. Defendant challenged them one-by-one, but the totality applies. State v. Friscia, 2026 MT 158 (July 21, 2026).

It was not reasonably subject to dispute that plaintiffs continued to resist after being handcuffed and on the ground such that other force was necessary. Post-arrest, “And even if we might agree with them that some of the deputies’ conduct and statements escalated the situation by being unnecessarily condescending or disrespectful, an officer’s subjective state of mind does not make an otherwise reasonable use of force unconstitutional.” Hayes v. Owen, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 21601 (10th Cir. July 21, 2026).*

The warrantless search of defendant’s house was valid because he was on supervised release with a search condition. United States v. Woolf, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161574 (D. Idaho July 20, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.