E.D.Cal.: Supervised release search condition permitted cell phone search

The warrantless search of defendant’s cell phone was reasonable because he was a supervised release. The timing of the search after the seizure of the phone was also reasonable. United States v. Yama, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160332 (E.D. Cal. July 20, 2026).

The seizure and search of two laptops were reasonable as border searches and by consent. United States v. Huawei Techs. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161714 (E.D.N.Y. June 18, 2026).

This CSAM warrant was issued and executed in this district, so the court has venue over offenses found, despite some other counts potentially being in other districts. United States v. Lee, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161582 (E.D. Va. July 20, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Border search, Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.