KY: Unrelated questions during ongoing traffic stop didn’t extend it under Rodriguez

While the officer asked unrelated questions during the traffic stop, the mission of the stop was ongoing throughout. Therefore, the questions didn’t really extend the stop. Miller v. Commonwealth, 2026 Ky. App. LEXIS 64 (July 2, 2026).

The officer saw defendant following too close behind a truck, and that gave an objectively reasonable basis for this stop. [Four minutes into the stop, a drug dog was called, and not a word about reasonable suspicion for that.] United States v. Gilley, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111425 (W.D. Ark. May 20, 2026).*

Defendant any lacked standing in the property searched. Also, the locks had been changed by the time of the search, and he had no access then. United States v. Reger, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148699 (E.D. Cal. July 2, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.