Monthly Archives: October 2023

CA3: SoL for illegal search claims not tolled by incarcerated

Plaintiff inmate’s statute of limitations for an illegal search claim starts when he should be aware of the claim and it is not tolled while he is incarcerated. Poteat v. Lydon, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 26961 (3d Cir. Oct. 11, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: SoL for illegal search claims not tolled by incarcerated

CA8: Continuation of arrest after the officer learned it was unjustified denied the officer QI

Continuation of plaintiff’s arrest after the officer learned it was unjustified denied the officer qualified immunity. “Even if we concluded Officer Holtan made a reasonable mistake about probable cause when he first tackled Nieters to the ground, Nieters immediately informed … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Continuation of arrest after the officer learned it was unjustified denied the officer QI

N.D.Ala.: Whether DTF officer could make speeding stops was a reasonable mistake of law under Heien

The task force officer involved allegedly wasn’t authorized to make speeding traffic stops, but this was a reasonable mistake of law under Heien. United States v. Shepherd, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181976 (N.D. Ala. Oct. 10, 2023). The bulge in … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Whether DTF officer could make speeding stops was a reasonable mistake of law under Heien

D.Haw.: 11-month delay in getting DNA warrant was reasonable

An eleven month delay in the government obtaining a DNA warrant was reasonable. “Under the totality of the circumstances, the Court concludes that, while the search warrant perhaps could have been sought earlier, the eleven-month period between arrest and the … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, geofence, Private search, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Haw.: 11-month delay in getting DNA warrant was reasonable

D.N.M.: RS not needed for questions at a fixed immigration checkpoint

Defendant’s questioning about his work at a fixed immigration checkpoint did not require reasonable suspicion. United States v. Briscoe, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181188 (D.N.M. Oct. 6, 2023). There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop at gunpoint for his being … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Immigration checkpoints, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: RS not needed for questions at a fixed immigration checkpoint

D.Mont.: Def’s interest in his package is a reasonable delivery time, but not an exact time

When a package in transit is detained for investigation, the person named on the package has an interest in a reasonable delivery time, but not an exact time. United States v. Hamlin, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180215 (D. Mont. Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Def’s interest in his package is a reasonable delivery time, but not an exact time

MA: Officer recording drug deal on cell phone governed by state wiretap law

An officer’s surreptitious recording of a drug deal with a cell phone is an interception of a communication under the state wiretapping law. Commonwealth v. Du, 2023 Mass. App. LEXIS 143 (Oct. 6, 2023). The publicly available address (SoS, website, … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Video surveillance | Comments Off on MA: Officer recording drug deal on cell phone governed by state wiretap law

DE: High crime area + messy car ≠ RS

Defendant lived in a “high crime area,” and that did not make his car subject to search just because of alleged tips. “When Officer Millner asked Defendant whether there were guns or drugs in the vehicle, Defendant replied ‘no’ and … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: High crime area + messy car ≠ RS

OH7: Def didn’t impliedly consent to officer’s entry into hotel room when def was getting his ID

The officer encountered defendant in the hotel lobby. He asked for defendant’s ID, and defendant said he had to go to his room to get it. The officer asked if he could accompany him to the room. The officer’s entry … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Inventory, Voluntariness | Comments Off on OH7: Def didn’t impliedly consent to officer’s entry into hotel room when def was getting his ID

N.D.Cal.: Motion to suppress based on state court issuing judge lacking jurisdiction saved by GFE even if true

Defendant’s motion to suppress based on the state court judge issuing the warrant lacking jurisdiction is denied on the merits and by the good faith exception. United States v. Bailey, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179249 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Motion to suppress based on state court issuing judge lacking jurisdiction saved by GFE even if true

CA10: Inevitable discovery applies despite lack of PC in first SW

Even though the initial search warrant was issued without probable cause, inevitable discovery can still apply. United States v. Streett, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 26423 (10th Cir. Oct. 5, 2023):

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA10: Inevitable discovery applies despite lack of PC in first SW

W.D.Wash.: Administrative SDT to Starbucks is reasonable in scope

An administrative subpoena duces tecum to Starbucks is enforced. It is reasonable in scope. Su v. Starbucks Corp., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179355 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 4, 2023):

Posted in Administrative search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Administrative SDT to Starbucks is reasonable in scope

W.D.N.Y.: Parolee had standing in place searched despite his reduced REP

The R&R determined that defendant parolee had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched because of his parole status alone. The District Judge disagrees, finds enough standing to contest the search, and remands to the USMJ to decide … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Parolee had standing in place searched despite his reduced REP

AR: Dog alerted outside before it went in open door to sniff again

A drug dog alerted on defendant’s car before the dog approached an open door and sniffed inside, too. The outside alert made the inside alert reasonable. Fleming v. State, 2023 Ark. App. 439 (Oct. 4, 2023). Officers received an anonymous … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on AR: Dog alerted outside before it went in open door to sniff again

S.D.Ind. Warrant for video surveillance required under Title III

A warrant for CCTV surveillance of the defendant came under the wiretap statute, Title III, and necessity and probable cause was shown. United States v. Jones, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178457 (S.D. Ind. Oct. 4, 2023). The totality of information … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion, Video surveillance | Comments Off on S.D.Ind. Warrant for video surveillance required under Title III

CA6: Smell of MJ on student’s person justified school search

The smell of marijuana on a student’s person justified a school search, and here it was their backpack then pockets. Stanford v. Northmont City Sch. Dist., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 26336 (6th Cir. Oct. 2, 2023). This § 1983 plaintiff … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, School searches, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Smell of MJ on student’s person justified school search

OH: Written inventory not always required to justify it

The failure of officers to make a written inventory doesn’t necessarily constitutionally nullify the inventory. Officer’s testimony about the standardized procedures was sufficient without actually putting the policy into evidence. State v. Toran, 2023-Ohio-3564, 2023 Ohio LEXIS 1957 (Oct. 4, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH: Written inventory not always required to justify it

CA11: Officer gets QI for ordering passenger to produce ID

The officer in a Florida traffic stop could get the driver out of the vehicle as a matter of course under Mimms. Under Maryland v. Wilson, he could order the passenger out, too. It was not clearly established law that … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officer gets QI for ordering passenger to produce ID

Guardian: TechScape: How police use location and search data to find suspects – and not always the right ones

Guardian: TechScape: How police use location and search data to find suspects – and not always the right ones (“It’s a practice public defenders, privacy advocates and many lawmakers have criticised, arguing it violates fourth amendment protections against unreasonable searches. … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Guardian: TechScape: How police use location and search data to find suspects – and not always the right ones

CA6: Incriminating nature of gun was reasonably immediately apparent to officers

The incriminating nature of an AR-15 was immediately apparent to the officers. They don’t have to know that it’s contraband, just that it’s reasonably likely. On this record, that was shown. United States v. Grier, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 26077 … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA6: Incriminating nature of gun was reasonably immediately apparent to officers