Daily Archives: October 8, 2023

OH7: Def didn’t impliedly consent to officer’s entry into hotel room when def was getting his ID

The officer encountered defendant in the hotel lobby. He asked for defendant’s ID, and defendant said he had to go to his room to get it. The officer asked if he could accompany him to the room. The officer’s entry … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Inventory, Voluntariness | Comments Off on OH7: Def didn’t impliedly consent to officer’s entry into hotel room when def was getting his ID

N.D.Cal.: Motion to suppress based on state court issuing judge lacking jurisdiction saved by GFE even if true

Defendant’s motion to suppress based on the state court judge issuing the warrant lacking jurisdiction is denied on the merits and by the good faith exception. United States v. Bailey, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179249 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Motion to suppress based on state court issuing judge lacking jurisdiction saved by GFE even if true

CA10: Inevitable discovery applies despite lack of PC in first SW

Even though the initial search warrant was issued without probable cause, inevitable discovery can still apply. United States v. Streett, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 26423 (10th Cir. Oct. 5, 2023):

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA10: Inevitable discovery applies despite lack of PC in first SW

W.D.Wash.: Administrative SDT to Starbucks is reasonable in scope

An administrative subpoena duces tecum to Starbucks is enforced. It is reasonable in scope. Su v. Starbucks Corp., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179355 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 4, 2023):

Posted in Administrative search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Administrative SDT to Starbucks is reasonable in scope