Daily Archives: July 26, 2023

CA10: Civil remedy for violation of Posse Comitatus Act, not exclusion

The remedy for a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act is civil, not exclusion. United States v. King, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 19052 (10th Cir. July 25, 2023) (denying COA). “On the whole, the factors outlined in Chavez provide mixed … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA10: Civil remedy for violation of Posse Comitatus Act, not exclusion

Cal.3: PC to search passenger compartment for gun didn’t extend to the trunk

Officers had probable cause to search defendant’s passenger compartment for a firearm. When the gun wasn’t found there, the officer searched the trunk, finding it. The probable cause, however, did not extend to the trunk. People v. Leal, 2023 Cal. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on Cal.3: PC to search passenger compartment for gun didn’t extend to the trunk

CA4: Not clearly established that VA DOC can’t drug test a Telecommunications Network Coordinator

Qualified immunity applies to the Virginia DOC directing a drug test of a Telecommunications Network Coordinator. “After VDOC fired Garrett for declining a random drug test, Garrett sued, alleging that VDOC employees violated his Fourth Amendment rights by applying VDOC’s … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Not clearly established that VA DOC can’t drug test a Telecommunications Network Coordinator

D.D.C.: SEC admin subpoena for law firm cyberattack was narrowed to only affected clients

Covington & Burling was the target of a cyberattack, and the SEC investigated. It wanted the names of all affected clients, but C&B resisted, seeking narrower disclosure. The law firm agreed that only certain affected clients should be disclosed, and … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.D.C.: SEC admin subpoena for law firm cyberattack was narrowed to only affected clients

E.D.Wis.: Late disclosed information justified the late filing of the motion to suppress

Late disclosed information justified the late filing of the motion to suppress. But, it still loses on the merits. United States v. Love, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126671 (E.D. Wis. July 24, 2023).* This stop was based on reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Late disclosed information justified the late filing of the motion to suppress

E.D.N.Y.: In a murder for hire case, a two year delay between the killing and the search didn’t make it presumably stale

In a murder for hire case, a two year delay between the homicide and the search warrant for defendant’s premises did not make the warrant presumably stale. The warrant sought digital evidence, and there were four conspirators and it spanned … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness, Uncategorized | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: In a murder for hire case, a two year delay between the killing and the search didn’t make it presumably stale

DE: SW issuing magistrate not barred from hearing suppression motion

The suppression hearing judge is not disqualified just because he or she considered the affidavit and issued the search warrant. Willis v. State, 2023 Del. LEXIS 238 (July 24, 2023). Setting inaccuracies in the search warrant affidavit aside, there was … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonableness | Comments Off on DE: SW issuing magistrate not barred from hearing suppression motion

D.Kan.: The “Kansas Two-Step” order

Shaw v. Jones, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126478 (D. Kan. July 21, 2023):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Kan.: The “Kansas Two-Step” order