Monthly Archives: July 2022

N.D.Ind.: USMJ’s finding stop was racially motivated is irrelevant and rejected

The USMJ’s finding that the stop was racially motivated is rejected. Reviewing the dashcam video, the stop was clearly justified for a traffic offense, and that’s all that was legally required. United States v. Crawford, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120634 … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: USMJ’s finding stop was racially motivated is irrelevant and rejected

CA4: Asking motorist whether he is armed relates to officer safety

Asking motorist whether he is armed relates to officer safety, and it is reasonable during a stop. United States v. Racer, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 18664 (4th Cir. July 7, 2022). Dog sniff outside an apartment door didn’t violate any … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA4: Asking motorist whether he is armed relates to officer safety

S.D.N.Y.: Even illegally seized evidence could be used at sentencing

Defendant’s claim of illegal search is moot for the trial because the government says it’s not using it. It could, however, come up at sentencing. “In United States v. Tejada, the Second Circuit held that ‘[a]bsent a showing that officers … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Inventory, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Even illegally seized evidence could be used at sentencing

Cal.6: Calling drug dog before the stop helped show the stop was prolonged for dog’s arrival

The officer unreasonably prolonged the stop for the arrival of the drug dog. While subjective intentions aren’t determinative under Whren, here the officer called for the drug dog before the stop even happened. People v. Ayon, 2022 Cal. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Cal.6: Calling drug dog before the stop helped show the stop was prolonged for dog’s arrival

CA6 & FL1: Fact hemp is legal doesn’t make smell of MJ lack PC

The fact that hemp was legal doesn’t make the smell like marijuana a lack of probable cause. United States v. McCallister, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 18642 (6th Cir. July 7, 2022) (people in a park); Hatcher v. State, 2022 Fla. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA6 & FL1: Fact hemp is legal doesn’t make smell of MJ lack PC

N.D.Ohio: Received CP rarely gets stale

The offense of receiving child pornography rarely gets stale, and here it didn’t. Here it was images from a young girl the defendant sought. United States v. Brackman, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118020 (N.D. Ohio July 5, 2022)*:

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Received CP rarely gets stale

CA8: Omission of a fact not yet known is not a Franks violation

A detective’s omission of a critical fact that was not yet known is not a Franks violation. “What is undisputed, at least at this point, is that Detective Bowles did not actually know that the fire captain had described the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA8: Omission of a fact not yet known is not a Franks violation

CA1: Voluntary act after unreasonable stop made evidence admissible

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s seizure on the totality. But, “Sierra-Ayala’s intervening volitional act, in the absence of exploitative behavior by López-Maysonet, renders the discovery of the drugs sufficiently attenuated so as to dissipate the taint of the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CA1: Voluntary act after unreasonable stop made evidence admissible

NJ: Refusal of a frisk without RS does not add to RS

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop. People who live in a “high crime area” do not have lesser constitutional protection. The facts here just didn’t support a frisk, and he had a right to refuse one, and that … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NJ: Refusal of a frisk without RS does not add to RS

CA8: PC shown but for nexus, but GFE overcame that

The district court held the affidavit for the search warrant didn’t say enough to supply nexus to defendant’s home, but the good faith exception applied. Affirmed. The affidavit was sufficient for probable cause defendant was involved in dealing drugs, and … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus | Comments Off on CA8: PC shown but for nexus, but GFE overcame that

D.Md.: Def did not go to trial because counsel misstated the chances of success of a suppression motion

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel of counsel claim for allegedly misstating the chances of success of a suppression motion is rejected. It was complex but not frivolous, and it was rejected and affirmed on appeal. Defense counsel didn’t misstate anything. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Md.: Def did not go to trial because counsel misstated the chances of success of a suppression motion

N.D.Ind.: Typo in SW home address was cured by picture of house

A typo in defendant’s home address was not prejudicial where there was a picture of the house included in the warrant. Thus, no ineffective assistance of counsel for not challenging it. Kassay v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116669 … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Typo in SW home address was cured by picture of house

E.D.Ark.: Def’s statements disassociating himself from the premises searched showed no standing

Defendant had some connection to the premises, but his disassociation from the premises when asked about it by the police showed his lack of standing. “To resolve his motion to suppress, however, the Court need not determine whether these possessory … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Def’s statements disassociating himself from the premises searched showed no standing

CA11: Reasonable mistake of law on basis for stop was not 4A violation

“An officer’s reasonable mistake of law—that is, when ‘the law turns out to be not what was thought’—can justify probable cause. [Heien] at 61-64. The officer ‘deserve[s] a margin of error’ when ‘the application of a statute is unclear—however clear … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Reasonable mistake of law on basis for stop was not 4A violation

M.D.La.: Car could be searched when it was stopped near home being searched with SW

“[O]fficers were entitled to search the car pursuant to the warrant because Defendant was stopped within the immediate vicinity of his residence.” United States v. Clayton, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116345 (M.D. La. June 30, 2022).* During a traffic stop, … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonableness, Scope of search | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Car could be searched when it was stopped near home being searched with SW

S.D.Fla.: A § 1983 case over pre-Kraft video surveillance dismissed for QI

In another court ordered video surveillance massage parlor case, this time a § 1983 case, the surveillance order was pre-Kraft where the 4th DCA suppressed surveillance there, so the defendants get qualified immunity. Taig v. Currey, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: A § 1983 case over pre-Kraft video surveillance dismissed for QI

CA8: Independent source justified search despite illegal protective sweep

“Herbert Green previously appealed the denial of his motion to suppress drugs and firearms discovered in his apartment during a law enforcement search outside the scope of the police’s warrant. See United States v. Green, 9 F.4th 682, 691-93 (8th … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Independent source, Inventory, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA8: Independent source justified search despite illegal protective sweep

CA11: Anonymous tip of bad driving corroborated by seeing it themselves

Anonymous report of bad driving led officers to observe defendant who saw it themselves. The stop was justified. United States v. Menendez, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 18232 (11th Cir. July 1, 2022). Defendant was suspected of building, buying, and selling … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA11: Anonymous tip of bad driving corroborated by seeing it themselves

S.D.Ind.: Inordinate delay in producing cell phone search discovery doesn’t justify dismissal

The government’s untimely discovery response to defendant’s repeated requests for the product of his cell phone search doesn’t warrant dismissal of the indictment. Probable cause was shown for the cell phone search, and the motion to suppress is denied. United … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Inordinate delay in producing cell phone search discovery doesn’t justify dismissal

E.D.Va.: No RS for protective sweep of car for weapon

The officers lacked reasonable suspicion for a protective sweep of defendant’s car. His actions did not support any suggestion he might be armed. United States v. Trice, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115463 (E.D. Va. June 29, 2022).* Defendant’s refusal to … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: No RS for protective sweep of car for weapon