Category Archives: Staleness

CA8: Taking box off FedEx conveyor belt for dog sniff didn’t deprive FedEx of custody

Moving a suspicious looking box from the FedEx conveyor belt to a back room for a dog sniff did not require reasonable suspicion nor did it deprive FedEx of custody of the box. The dog alert provided justification for a … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Mail and packages, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Taking box off FedEx conveyor belt for dog sniff didn’t deprive FedEx of custody

CA7: Without a triggering condition, this was not an anticipatory warrant

Despite defendant’s argument, this was not an anticipatory search warrant. There was no triggering condition, and it was issued with probable cause. United States v. Calligan, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 23402 (7th Cir. Aug. 6, 2021). There clearly was reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Nexus, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA7: Without a triggering condition, this was not an anticipatory warrant

OH1: Years old info of drug dealing coupled with current trash pull showing drug use was clearly stale; no GFE

Years old information of drug dealing in another county coupled with a trash pull of recent drug use (not trafficking) was stale, and the search warrant was clearly lacking probable cause. Therefore, the good faith exception does not apply. State … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Dog sniff, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on OH1: Years old info of drug dealing coupled with current trash pull showing drug use was clearly stale; no GFE

M.D.La.: Court finds RS for a traffic stop, so CI tip doesn’t have to be considered

“Turning to the facts of the instant case, the Court must resolve the central question: did Nations see Defendant commit a traffic violation? Having listened to Nations’ testimony, observed him in open court, and reviewed the video and written transcript … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Court finds RS for a traffic stop, so CI tip doesn’t have to be considered

S.D.N.Y.: Def’s response to a SDT showed records existed for later SW; not stale

Defendant’s receipt of and response to a subpoena for fraud records in an older fraud case established timeliness and lack of staleness when the government decided to proceed by search warrant instead. Staleness is a question of probable cause. United … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Def’s response to a SDT showed records existed for later SW; not stale

S.D.Ga.: SW for this motel room wasn’t stale after two days

While a search warrant for a motel room, a more transient place than a home, might get stale faster, this one didn’t considering the nature of the allegations. “[B]ased on the totality of the circumstances, the evidence was not stale … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: SW for this motel room wasn’t stale after two days

ND: Reasonableness under Heien supported even though erroneous conclusion traffic offense occurred

Whether failure to signal while exiting a roundabout is a traffic offense is a valid reason for a stop or not, it was reasonable for the officer to conclude it was, and that justifies the stop under Heien. City of … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on ND: Reasonableness under Heien supported even though erroneous conclusion traffic offense occurred

GA: Mistake as to smell of MJ v. hemp was reasonable, if there was one

“At most, Gowen’s assertion about the similarity of the smells of hemp and marijuana calls into question the reasonableness of the officer’s belief that he smelled burnt marijuana. Assuming for purposes of this appeal that Gowen’s assertion is correct (even … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on GA: Mistake as to smell of MJ v. hemp was reasonable, if there was one

D.Conn.: Unreasonable delay in getting SW for cell phone defeats GFE

Where the officers impermissibly delayed obtaining a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone, the good faith exception does not apply. The initial seizure of the phone was valid because it was left at a crime scene. United States v. Tisdol, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Staleness, Waiver, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Unreasonable delay in getting SW for cell phone defeats GFE

Army: Consent to search was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority

Defendant’s consent to search his apartment was obtained after telling him that it was based on the death of his roommate in the parking lot. He was in “custody,” and this was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority. “In … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Seizure, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on Army: Consent to search was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority

N.D.Ohio: DMV’s computer mistake def’s DL was suspended doesn’t invoke the exclusionary rule under Evans

DMV’s computer mistake defendant’s DL was suspended doesn’t invoke the exclusionary rule under Evans. United States v. Salazar, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103027 (N.D. Ohio June 2, 2021). Defendant’s “regenerating” activity in selling heroin made the warrant application not stale. … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Exclusionary rule, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: DMV’s computer mistake def’s DL was suspended doesn’t invoke the exclusionary rule under Evans

WA: Unverified belief in existence of arrest warrant required suppression

Unverified belief there was an arrest warrant for defendant required that the arrest and search be suppressed. State v. Pines, 2021 Wash. App. LEXIS 1223 (May 17, 2021). “Here, while the record is unclear as to when the outstanding warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on WA: Unverified belief in existence of arrest warrant required suppression

WA: Prior knowledge of arrest warrant became stale

Stale information that a warrant existed for defendant was not probable cause when the warrant had been recalled, and no one checked the day of the arrest. State v. Pines, 2021 Wash. App. LEXIS 1160 (May 10, 2021). Subpoenas to … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine, Staleness | Comments Off on WA: Prior knowledge of arrest warrant became stale

N.D.Ind.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to provide the particularity, but it can if incorporated

The search warrant here is directed at a place and it’s not required to tie a person to it, unless it aids particularity. The affidavit for the warrant does not need to be particular but the warrant itself does. The … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Particularity, Staleness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to provide the particularity, but it can if incorporated

W.D.Tenn.: CI’s tip def had a gun was corroborated by def discarding it in view of officers

Police received a CI’s tip defendant had a gun. The tip alone lacked reliability until the officer saw defendant discard it. “Notably, the reasonable suspicion standard does not present the most demanding hurdle to overcome. See Kansas v. Glover, 140 … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: CI’s tip def had a gun was corroborated by def discarding it in view of officers

N.D.Ohio: Franks challenge succeeds: no PC of trafficking, stale, and no GFE

Defendant prevails in his Franks challenge. The police withheld that defendant was at worst a suspect in personal use of marijuana, but made it look like he was a trafficker when they had no evidence of it. That means that … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Franks challenge succeeds: no PC of trafficking, stale, and no GFE

D.Conn.: When govt raises an exception to warrant requirement, def must rebut in briefing, but cell phone seizure shown unjustified

In response to defendant’s motion to suppress, the government argued search incident, which the defense didn’t rebut in the papers. Motion denied in part. Defendant’s cell phone seizure is suppressed, however, because the government didn’t show justification for its seizure. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Overseizure, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Conn.: When govt raises an exception to warrant requirement, def must rebut in briefing, but cell phone seizure shown unjustified

N.D.Cal.: Potential for risk of violence justified nighttime search

Defendant’s motion to suppress on several grounds is denied. The affidavit showed probable cause, and the good faith exception would apply anyway. The affidavit for a firearm wasn’t stale; the information about weapons was still “fresh” even though a shooting … Continue reading

Posted in Nighttime search, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Potential for risk of violence justified nighttime search

NE: Three day old information vehicle was involved in a shooting was RS

There was reasonable suspicion for the stop of defendant’s vehicle on a three day old report of it being involved in a shooting. On appeal from a denial of a motion to suppress, the evidence from both the suppression hearing … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness, Standards of review | Comments Off on NE: Three day old information vehicle was involved in a shooting was RS

S.D.Ga.: Fact an officer knew of suspect from prior contact doesn’t preclude running name and dob for warrants

The fact an officer knew a suspect from prior interactions doesn’t mean that the officer can’t run the name and dob for warrants. New Covenant Church v. Futch, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22523 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 5, 2021). Defense counsel … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Fact an officer knew of suspect from prior contact doesn’t preclude running name and dob for warrants