Category Archives: Informant hearsay

D.S.D.: Two anonymous tips about a car built upon one another and provided RS

Two anonymous tips about a car built upon one another and finding the car on the interstate was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Gonzalez, No. 422-CR-40119-KES, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167068 (D.S.D. Sep. 15, 2023). Defendant was indicted for conspiring … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Foreign searches, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Two anonymous tips about a car built upon one another and provided RS

DE: When defense to rape is consent, 4A claim against DNA test doesn’t matter

Where the defense was consent, the alleged ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to move to suppress DNA results can’t be ineffectiveness. State v. Elder, 2023 Del. Super. LEXIS 770 (Sep. 13, 2023).* CBP officers used an “escort hold” on … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, DNA, Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on DE: When defense to rape is consent, 4A claim against DNA test doesn’t matter

IL: No RS for stop of van allegedly involved in a robbery; officer had no details

“The trial court decided the facts were sufficient to justify a Terry stop. After taking account of the totality of the circumstances, we reverse the denial of Maxfield’s motion to quash arrest and suppress the identification and other evidence obtained, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: No RS for stop of van allegedly involved in a robbery; officer had no details

MN: CI’s successful track record supports reliability

The court reiterates that a CI’s successful track record supports his reliability. State v. Mosley, 2023 Minn. LEXIS 451 (Sep. 6, 2023). The exclusionary rule does not apply to supervised release violations. Defendant’s panicking to a felony arrest was “not … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MN: CI’s successful track record supports reliability

D.Mass.: SW affidavit based on CI’s tale gets a Franks hearing

Defendant made his “substantial preliminary showing” for a possible Franks violation on the credibility of a CI to at least get a hearing. (And it sounds like he’d prevail at the hearing because the affidavit depended entirely on the CI’s … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Mass.: SW affidavit based on CI’s tale gets a Franks hearing

E.D.Pa.: Ongoing investigation bars access to warrant papers for time being

The target of a search warrant can’t yet get access to the affidavit in support because the case is still under investigation and there is a potential of exposing grand jury witnesses. In re Search Warrants Issued November 30, 2022, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Ongoing investigation bars access to warrant papers for time being

TX5 upholds geofence warrant on PC and nexus, and then with GFE

The geofence warrant here satisfied the requirements of both probable cause and the good faith exception. There aren’t a lot of cases on geofence warrants, but those reaching the merits (and not just GFE) fully support the process here of … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX5 upholds geofence warrant on PC and nexus, and then with GFE

ID: Pleading only state constitution waived 4A

Defendant’s pleading only the state constitution waived the Fourth Amendment claim. State v. Bell, 2023 Ida. LEXIS 95 (Aug. 15, 2023). Defendant complained trial counsel was ineffective for not challenging a search of house that was allegedly burglarized and defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Standing, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on ID: Pleading only state constitution waived 4A

M.D.Fla.: A records preservation request to cell phone providers was not a seizure

A records preservation letter sent to cell phone providers was not a seizure, let alone an unreasonable one. The records were later secured by search warrant. United States v. Zwiefelhofer, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134679 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 2, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Seizure, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: A records preservation request to cell phone providers was not a seizure

Army: Affidavit for SW didn’t show why text messages would still be on def’s cell phone; but harmless error

The government did not show in the affidavit for search authorization that text messages would logically be found on his cell phone corroborating a sex crime victim. Nevertheless, he wasn’t prejudiced by it. United States v. Geranen, 2023 CCA LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Inventory, Seizure, Staleness | Comments Off on Army: Affidavit for SW didn’t show why text messages would still be on def’s cell phone; but harmless error

W.D.Tenn.: Violation of police dept. vehicle chase policy doesn’t equate to a violation of the 4A

An alleged violation of department policy on police chases doesn’t equal a Fourth Amendment violation. United States v. Moore, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130238 (W.D. Tenn. July 27, 2023). Speeding and erratic driving justified the stop, and alcohol was seen … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Violation of police dept. vehicle chase policy doesn’t equate to a violation of the 4A

CA10: Civil remedy for violation of Posse Comitatus Act, not exclusion

The remedy for a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act is civil, not exclusion. United States v. King, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 19052 (10th Cir. July 25, 2023) (denying COA). “On the whole, the factors outlined in Chavez provide mixed … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA10: Civil remedy for violation of Posse Comitatus Act, not exclusion

KS: Typo in date of GPS warrant was “technical irregularity” that could be overlooked

A typo in the date on a GPS tracking warrant was a technical irregularity that did not substantively prejudice him. State v. Campbell, 2023 Kan. LEXIS 49 (July 14, 2023). The fact defendant’s statement to the police that formed the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: Typo in date of GPS warrant was “technical irregularity” that could be overlooked

M.D.Ala.: CI’s controlled buy doesn’t have to be on video to support PC

There’s no constitutional requirement that the informant’s controlled buy be on video to support probable cause. United States v. Salter, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119269 (M.D. Ala. June 7, 2023), adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115746 (M.D. Ala. July 6, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: CI’s controlled buy doesn’t have to be on video to support PC

E.D.Ark.: Ptf’s Facebook posts shooting guns supported use of flashbang during drug raid

Plaintiff’s Facebook posts of her shooting guns on her property supported the use of flashbang devices when her house was subjected to a drug raid by the SWAT team. Davenport v. City of Little Rock, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119102 … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Ptf’s Facebook posts shooting guns supported use of flashbang during drug raid

E.D.La.: Leaving the wrong SW at the scene of the search is not a ground to suppress

Leaving the wrong search warrant at the scene of the search is not a ground to suppress. United States v. Major, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116569 (E.D. La. July 7, 2023). The CI had no track record, but his story … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Leaving the wrong SW at the scene of the search is not a ground to suppress

E.D.Mich.: The tip was anonymous, but it was corroborated by investigation

The initial tip about defendant being a drug dealer was anonymous, but officers investigated to corroborate it. “Detectives went to the address associated with the phone number provided by the anonymous source, observed activity which they believed was consistent with … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: The tip was anonymous, but it was corroborated by investigation

S.D.Ohio: Federal suit to force state court to apply exclusionary rule barred by Younger and Rooker/Feldman

Plaintiff’s suit in federal court to cause state court to apply the exclusionary rule in state court is barred by Younger and Rooker/Feldman. Chappel v. Adams Cnty. Child.’s Servs., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112877 (S.D. Ohio May 19, 2023). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Federal suit to force state court to apply exclusionary rule barred by Younger and Rooker/Feldman

TX1: 911 call about a suspected kidnapping led to a stop found valid under Naverette

A 911 call about a suspected kidnapping led to a stop found valid under Naverette. Small v. State, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 4610 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) June 29, 2023)* (unpublished) “These events establish probable cause, especially when … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX1: 911 call about a suspected kidnapping led to a stop found valid under Naverette

M.D.Ala.: Failure to back up CI made SW lack PC

Relying on a CI without backing him up failed to show probable cause. “With these guiding principles in mind, the undersigned concludes the search warrant affidavit here did not provide a substantial basis for finding probable cause to believe narcotics … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Informant hearsay, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Failure to back up CI made SW lack PC