CA3: Ptf was arrested on an apparent but recalled warrant, then officers confirmed it and let him go; the arrest was reasonable

Plaintiff was arrested because the officers reasonably believed there was a warrant for his arrest. “When Vince provided documentation that the warrant had been lifted, the officers confirmed the information and released him, which was reasonable under the circumstances. Therefore, the arrest was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment and no violation occurred. The District Court committed no error in dismissing Vince’s Section 1983 claim for unlawful arrest under the Fourth Amendment.” Vince v. Godlewski, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 16017 (3d Cir. June 3, 2026).

“On interlocutory appeal from denial of qualified immunity at summary judgment stage, where undisputed facts showed armed teenager fled from officer during 42-second chase, ignored commands, briefly crouched, then continued running while turning head toward officer but made no threatening movements with weapon, officer’s use of deadly force violated clearly established Fourth Amendment rights because mere possession of weapon and flight, without threatening weapon movement, cannot justify deadly force.” Ruffin v. Davis, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 12352 (4th Cir. Apr. 29, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.