E.D.Mich.: The tip was anonymous, but it was corroborated by investigation

The initial tip about defendant being a drug dealer was anonymous, but officers investigated to corroborate it. “Detectives went to the address associated with the phone number provided by the anonymous source, observed activity which they believed was consistent with the sale of narcotics, and conducted four trash pulls—from which they seized a substantial amount of drug refuse, including approximately thirty baggies with suspected narcotics residue (several of which were tested and revealed positive results for the presence of cocaine), multiple cut-up lottery tickets (which they knew from training and experience to be consistent with packaging for heroin and fentanyl), and bulk-sized bottles of Promethazine (intended for use by pharmacies to fill prescriptions, not for personal use).” That gave probable cause. United States v. Nelson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114505 (E.D. Mich. June 29, 2023).*

Overtinted windows justify the stop, and the smell of marijuana came from the car. Defendant was asked about smoking in the car, and he said “not recently.” In the backseat was marijuana and money. A search warrant for heroin was based on probable cause and was particular. United States v. Cabrera, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113209 (S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2023).*

“Based on the totality of the circumstances as they existed at the time that Jones approached Patterson, Jones had a particularized and objective basis for suspecting that Patterson was violating Michigan law that prohibits carrying a concealed weapon without a license. Jones testified that he decided to approach Patterson after seeing him try to conceal what appeared to be a firearm in the left pocket of Patterson’s sweatshirt. He stated that he observed an L-shaped object in the left pocket that, in his experience, was consistent with the size and shape of a firearm. … Jones and Patterson made eye contact as Patterson exited the gas station, after which Patterson’s body movement changed.” And he “bladed” away. United States v. Patterson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113797 (E.D. Mich. June 30, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.