Category Archives: Qualified immunity

OR: 3 am look at def’s car in driveway was unreasonable under state constitution

Officers approached defendant’s house by the driveway and came to the “back door” which was also a way into the house for ordinary visitors. The look at his car at 3 am exceeded implied consent to enter. “[A]t three o’clock … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Qualified immunity, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: 3 am look at def’s car in driveway was unreasonable under state constitution

CA5: Where 4A claim undecided below, it doesn’t form basis for stay

In the appeal of Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland, posted here, the Fifth Circuit doesn’t rely on the undecided Fourth Amendment claim in deciding on a stay. 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 32565 (5th Cir. Dec. 23, 2024).* The … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Where 4A claim undecided below, it doesn’t form basis for stay

NC: Drug dog alert on def’s car isn’t RS to frisk his person

A drug dog alert on defendant’s car isn’t reasonable suspicion to frisk his person. State v. Stollings, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS 1006 (Dec. 17, 2024). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not further challenging the search warrant issued after an entry … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Drug dog alert on def’s car isn’t RS to frisk his person

CA6: 4A IAC claim requires a showing petitioner would win on the merits of search claim

“And if Derringer intended to argue that counsel should have moved to suppress the cell phone videos, he did not identify any basis for challenging the validity of the search warrant that resulted in the seizure of the cell phone … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: 4A IAC claim requires a showing petitioner would win on the merits of search claim

OH8: Failure to attempt to distinguish contrary settled cases is waiver of argument

“In similar situations to the second transaction, federal courts have upheld the validity of the warrant to search a drug dealer’s premises based on the ‘common sense’ inference that drugs would be found in the home, essentially finding that evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Qualified immunity, Waiver | Comments Off on OH8: Failure to attempt to distinguish contrary settled cases is waiver of argument

NY3: “Common sense” that a drug dealer might have evidence on his cell phone isn’t PC

Just because defendant was a suspected drug dealer, there wasn’t probable cause for searching his cell phone. “While [officer] Bruno recounted that there was a quantity of drugs found in the motel room, along with the two phones, he did … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NY3: “Common sense” that a drug dealer might have evidence on his cell phone isn’t PC

CA6: Arrest based on unreliable eyewitness violates clearly established law

“Our precedent holds that it was clearly established that an officer may not arrest an individual based solely on an eyewitness account that is untruthful or unreliable. That is exactly what happened here when Officer Wieber learned that the prior … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Arrest based on unreliable eyewitness violates clearly established law

CA8: Pro se def’s standby counsel not ineffective at suppression hearing; not counsel’s role

Defendant chose to go pro se at the suppression hearing, grudgingly accepting standby counsel. After the motion to suppress was denied, he claimed ineffective assistance by standby counsel for not doing more. But that’s not standby counsel’s role. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA8: Pro se def’s standby counsel not ineffective at suppression hearing; not counsel’s role

W.D.Mo.: Judge actually participating in seizure denied absolute immunity

A state judge is denied absolute immunity for allegedly participating in a seizure in the courthouse rather than just ordering it. Rockett ex rel. His Minor Children v. Eighmy, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205918 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 13, 2024). A … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Judge actually participating in seizure denied absolute immunity

D.Alaska: Arriving passenger stopped in airport consented to search

“Here, in contrast, Ms. Spadaro was an arriving passenger; her airplane ticket was a nonissue. There is no indication that law enforcement took her identification from her. And, despite her several requests to use the restroom, the audio recording supports … Continue reading

Posted in Airport searches, Consent, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Arriving passenger stopped in airport consented to search

S.D.Ohio: SW for def’s address produced documents related to another address of his which were lawfully seized

“[T]he Court agrees with Moore that papers listing the 3151 Gobel address that were taken from the 3100 Vienna Woods address fall outside the scope of the search warrant’s plain language. … But that does not end the inquiry as … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: SW for def’s address produced documents related to another address of his which were lawfully seized

AR & PA: Def’s statements at time of search used at trial

Defendant’s DNA was taken by warrant at the jail, and his admissions about the offense during that captured on bodycam were admitted at trial. There was no questioning; it was voluntary. Torres v. State, 2024 Ark. App. 457 (Sep. 25, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Custody, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on AR & PA: Def’s statements at time of search used at trial

W.D.Mo.: Use of stop sticks was a reasonable seizure and with RS

“The Court finds that when Officers Zinn and Jasso placed the stop sticks and attempted to remove the subject from his vehicle, they had a reasonable, articulable suspicion that the individual behind the wheel of the Dodge Charger was involved … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Use of stop sticks was a reasonable seizure and with RS

CA9: Kneeling on arrestee’s back so he can’t breathe violates clearly established law

The officers’ kneeling on plaintiff’s back to secure him to the point plaintiff complained he couldn’t breathe violated clearly established law. Spencer v. Pew, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23463 (9th Cir. Sep. 16, 2024). The dash cam shows that defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Kneeling on arrestee’s back so he can’t breathe violates clearly established law

E.D.Cal.: Failure to provide medical care to an arrestee can be a 4A issue

Arrestee plaintiff pled due process, but it’s a Fourth Amendment claim for not “provid[ing] objectively reasonable post-arrest [medical] care to Plaintiff, a non-pretrial detainee, by ‘imped[ing] the medical staff from completing their task and pressuring them to discharge [Plaintiff],’ which … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Failure to provide medical care to an arrestee can be a 4A issue

W.D.Pa.: Losing suppression motion then pleading nolo was collateral estoppel in later civil case

Plaintiff raised a search issue in her underlying criminal case and lost. Later, she pled nolo and thus could not appeal. That’s final enough for collateral estoppel to apply in her § 1983 case. Harr v. Washington Area Humane Soc’y, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Losing suppression motion then pleading nolo was collateral estoppel in later civil case

NC: Warrant not needed to access data from GPS for post-conviction supervision

The data generated from the GPS attached to defendant as part of his post-conviction supervision can be accessed by law enforcement without a warrant. State v. Thomas, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS 687 (Sep. 3, 2024). The Tenth Circuit has made … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on NC: Warrant not needed to access data from GPS for post-conviction supervision

D.Minn.: Warrantless ion scan of car door handle was reasonable

A DNA ion scan of a car door handle was reasonable, relying on United States v. Jones, 2024 WL 1810220 (D. Minn. Apr. 25, 2024), finding no reasonable expectation of privacy in an ion scan on an apartment door from … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, DNA, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Warrantless ion scan of car door handle was reasonable

W.D.Wash.: Warrantless arrest in def’s doorway violated 4A

Defendant’s warrantless arrest in his doorway violated the Fourth Amendment. After objecting, defendant acceded to their demands when they pulled a Taser on him. The remedy of what to do with his statement will be addressed later. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Warrantless arrest in def’s doorway violated 4A

N.D.Cal.: SW affidavit need only “tend to show” a violation of law for a SW to issue

Defendant posted anonymously about killing libtards and their children (“parasites”) and “black robed despots” (judges), and he was a San Jose police officer. Officers knew he had nine guns. Officers got a search warrant for his computer to link him … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: SW affidavit need only “tend to show” a violation of law for a SW to issue