NC: Warrant not needed to access data from GPS for post-conviction supervision

The data generated from the GPS attached to defendant as part of his post-conviction supervision can be accessed by law enforcement without a warrant. State v. Thomas, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS 687 (Sep. 3, 2024).

The Tenth Circuit has made it clear that hearsay is admissible in suppression hearings, even after Crawford, quoting United States v. Lopez-Carillo, 536 F. App’x 762, 768-69 (10th Cir. 2013) (citing United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 172-77 (1974)). United States v. Quintana-Pena, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156938 (D.N.M. Aug. 30, 2024).*

A panel of the Ninth Circuit held in Sanderlin v. Dwyer, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 22411 (9th Cir. Sep. 4, 2024),* that fact questions remained whether the police actions against plaintiff were retaliatory under the First Amendment at a George Floyd protest. Fact issues also remained on whether shooting plaintiff in the groin with a less than lethal round “was excessive in violation of the Fourth Amendment because (1) Panighetti’s act of firing a projectile at Sanderlin constituted a seizure under the Fourth Amendment, (2) a triable issue of fact existed as to the reasonableness of the force used by Panighetti, and (3) although subsequent legal developments narrowed the scope of seizures under the Fourth Amendment, the right violated was clearly established at the time of the incident.”

This entry was posted in Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.